Kerala Court February 1981 Judgments
Ramesan Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-06-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ451
P. Janaki Amma, J. 1. The appellant is the accused in S. C. No. 2 of 1980, disposed of by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parur. The accused was charge sheeted for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of Narayanan Kartha, his maternal grand-father.2. The case of the prosecution is as follows :- The appellant was an accused in S.T. No. 931 of 1979 of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Perumbavoor, wherein he was charged for an offence under Section 51(a) of the Kerala Police Act. He was convicted in that case. He entertained enmity towards the deceased for not getting him released on bail during the pendency of that case. The deceased also stood in the Way of the sale by the appellant of his share of family properties, on which count also the appellant bore some grudge against the deceased. On 11-10-1979 at about 10.00 a.m. the appellant went to the house where the deceased was staying and demanded some money. The deceased did not accede to...
Tag this Judgment!P.S. Barkathali Vs. the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-04-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ker81; [1983]54CompCas46(Ker)
Bhat, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 23 EE of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (for short the Act) directed against the order passed in an appeal under Section 23-E of the Act.2. The appellant is a resident of Cho-wghat in Trichur District having properties, a house and a shop in the area. His father, Saidali, is a resident of Malaysia. When he comes down to India he resides with his son. On the basis of information that the appellant was receiving compensatory payment in violation of Section 5 (1) (aa) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, the house and shop were searched on 16-8-1972 by the Officers of the Calicut Unit of the Directorate of Enforcement, in the presence of the appellant's father but in the absence of the appellant. Foreign currency notes as well as certain documents were seized. On the same day, Saidali gave a statement admitting that he had been sending money through unauthorised agents to his son the present appellant between 1966 to 1972. Sub...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›