Kerala Court September 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.V. Joseph Vs. State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-14-1977
Reported in: 1978CriLJ1206
ORDERNarayana Pillai, J.1. Petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. (II of 1974), to quash an order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, and to give the petitioner, Joseph, custody of two film boxes, seized in the case.2. Joseph had approached the Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Ernakulam, with a complaint that one Raj an had cheated him of the film boxes. After they were seized in that case he moved for their custody. After hearing him and Rajan, the Magistrate allowed him to have their custody. Thereafter Rajan filed a petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, complaining that Joseph had cheated him and committed breach of trust in respect of the identical film boxes. The Chief Judicial Magistrate ordered investigation of that complaint. During investigation police seized the film boxes from Joseph. Then, both Joseph and Raj an, by two separate petitions, applied before the Chief Judicial Magistrate for their custody. Relying on Balaji v. State of ...
Keerampalli Sivasankaran Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty and a ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-06-1977
Reported in: [1978]114ITR899(Ker)
Balakrishna Eradi, J.1. The writ petitioner in O. P. No. 650 of 197'3, which was dismissed by a learned single judge of this court is the appellant before us. The challenge in that writ petition was directed against the proceedings taken against the petitioner by the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty for recovery of the amount of estate duty due jointly and severally by the petitioner and other members of his branch as accountable persons in respect of the estate left by one deceased, C. Gopalan, by the process of attachment of an amount lying in court deposit to the credit of a decree obtained by the petitioner against one Siclharthan and some others. The main contention taken in the writ petition is that for the purpose of realisation of the estate duty it is not open to the estate duty officer or to the revenue recovery officer acting on the strength of a certificate issued to him by the former to proceed against estate belonging to the accountable persons other than the propertie...
Muhammad and ors. Vs. Sinnamalu Amma
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-02-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Ker21
ORDERG. Balagangadharan Nair, J.1. The first respondent in the revision who is the landlord sought eviction of the petitioners who were in occupation of the first floor of a two storeyed building under the tenant who was the first respondent in the petition for eviction. Apart from the allegation that rent was in arrears--that question is no longer relevant--the main ground on which the landlord claimed eviction was under Section 11 (3) of the Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act which provides that:'A landlord may apply to the Rent Control Court for an order directing the tenant to put the landlord in possession of the building if he bona fide needs the building for his own occupation or for the occupation by any member of his family dependent on him.'2. In support of this ground the landlord had alleged that her husband P.W. 1 was running a stationery business and a medical shop in the ground floor, that her son Balagopalan was conducting a typewriting institute in a rented buildin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›