Kerala Court May 1977 Judgments
K. Ramachandran Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-27-1977
Reported in: (1978)IILLJ127Ker
V.P. Gopalan Nambiar, Ag. C.J.1. We are satisfied that the learned Judge's judgment was right. The question agitated is one regarding the right to promotion to the post of Assistant Professor and thereafter to the category of Professor ; and also one of inter se seniority as between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 7, The petitioner was appointed provisionally as Lecturer in the Kerala University on 20th July, 1960. The 3rd respondent was so appointed on 9-1-1959 ; the 5th respondent was similarly appointed on 20th July, 1960, The petitioner and respondents 3 to 7 were advised by the Public Service Commission for appointment as Assistant Professor by letter dated 8-10-1960. In the advice list of the Public Service Commission, the petitioner and respondents 3 to 7 were ranked as Nos. 2 to 7 respectively. No. 1 in the said list, some reason or other did not accept the appointment. (Counsel for the respondent stated that he resigned). The dates of promotion of the petitioner and respon...
Tag this Judgment!M.O. John Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-23-1977
Reported in: [1977]40STC134(Ker)
T. Kochu Thommen, J.1. The question arising for our consideration in this tax revision case is:Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the addition of Rs. 93,333 to the turnover in foodgrains is legally correct ?2. The assessee is a dealer in focdgrains and other articles. He returned a taxable turnover of Rs. 98,638.77 for the assessment year 1967-68. The Sales Tax Officer rejected his accounts in view of an unexplained investment of Rs. 10,000 and a credit of Rs. 4,000 which stood in the name of his deceased mother. These sums had been treated by the Income-tax Officer as income falling under the head ' other sources' in the assessment proceedings under the Central Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment year. The total sum of Rs. 14,000 was treated by the Sales Tax Officer as profit from undisclosed transactions and the turnover of such transactions was estimated at Rs. 93,333. Adding this amount to the declared turnover, the officer determined the taxable tur...
Tag this Judgment!Shareef Rawther and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-23-1977
Reported in: (1978)ILLJ114Ker
P. Subramonian Poti, J.1. Our learned brother Gopalan Nambiyar, J. (as he then was) referred this case to a Division Bench since an interesting question was raised before the learned Judge. Whether the period of leave taken by a Government servant for the pursuit of his studies should count as period during which such Government servant could be treated as on probation is the question that has arisen in this petition. Aspiring to get further promotions to posts which called for higher qualifications the petitioners in this case applied for leave even before they completed their periods of probation, obtained such leave and were pursuing their studies in the M. Sc. course in Analytical Chemistry. They were Technical Assistants Grade II at the time they went on leave. When vacancies arose in the posts of Technical Assistants Grade I they could not be regularly promoted as' they were not approved probationers. Rule 28 of the Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules requires that no memb...
Tag this Judgment!M. O. John Vs. State of KeralA.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-23-1977
Reported in: (1977)6CTR(Ker)197
Kochu Thommen, J. - The question arising for our consideration in this Tax Revision Case is :'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the addition of Rs. 93,333/- to the turnover in food-grains is legally correct ?'2. The assessee is a dealer in foodgrains and other articles. He returned a taxable turnover of Rs. 98,638.77 for the assessment year 1967-68. The Sales-tax Officer rejected his accounts in view of an unexplained investment of Rs. 10,000/-, and a credit of Rs. 4,000/- which stood in the name of his deceased mother. These sums had been treated by the Income-tax Officer as income falling under the head 'other sources' in the assessment proceedings under the Central Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment year. The total sum of Rs. 14,000/- was treated by the Sales-tax Officer as profit from undisclosed transactions and as profit from undisclosed transactions and the turnover of such transactions was estimated at Rs. 93,333/-. Adding this amount to the decl...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›