Kerala Court August 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax (Law) Vs. ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-06-1975
Reported in: [1975]36STC492(Ker)
P. Govindan Nair, C.J.1. These tax revision cases can be grouped under two heads, those taken by the revenue and those filed by the two assessees, Tirumbadi Rubber Company, Coimbatore, and M/s. Cochin Malabar Estates Ltd., Coimbatore. The tax revision cases taken by the revenue are 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 and 16 of 1974 and those by the two assessees are 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of 1974. These cases relate to the assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66.2. The question raised by the revenue is that the Tribunal erred in exonerating from tax the turnover pertaining to fallen rubber trees, twigs, empty barrels, scrap and so forth. We shall first deal with the batch of cases wherein this question has been raised. The relevant parts of the Tribunal's order pertaining to this aspect reads as follows :The turnover assessed in the years under appeal admittedly represented sale proceeds of fallen rubber trees, twigs, empty barrels, scrap, etc. Of these it is not clear whether the scrap i...
Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax (Law), Er ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-06-1975
Reported in: (1976)5CTR(Ker)0039B
Govindan Nair, C.J. - These tax revision cases cam be grouped under two heads, those taken by the revenue and those filed by the two assessees, Tirumbadi Rubber Company, Coimbatore, and M/s. Cochin Malabar Estates Ltd., Coimbatore. The tax revision cases taken by the revenue are 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 and 16 of 1974 and those by the two assessees are 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 of 1974, These cases relate to the assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66.2. The question raised by the revenue is that the Tribunal erred in exonerating from tax the turnover pertaining to fallen rubber trees, twigs, empty barrels, scrap and so forth. We shall first deal with the batch of cases wherein this question has been raised. The relevant parts of the Tribunals order pertaining to this aspect reads as follows :'The turnover assessed in the years under appeal admittedly represented sales proceeds of fallen rubber trees, twigs, empty barrels, scraps, etc. of these it is not clear whether the scrap i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›