Kerala Court September 1971 Judgments
Markos Aranaoutakis Vs. the Collector of Customs and Central Excise
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-24-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Ker192
P. Narayana Pillai, J.1. This petition is directed against an order, copy of which is Ext. P-5, passed by the respondent, the Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Cochin, the operative portion of which reads:'I confiscate absolutely the U.S.A. Currency amounting to Dollars 2418-00 under Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962, as proceeds from the sale of 39 cases of whisky smuggled from the S. T. Speedway; I also confiscate absolutely the U.S. A. currency amounting to Dollars 930.00 wider Section 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. I impose a personal penalty of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees seventy five thousand only) on Mr. Markos Aranoutakis, Master on Board S. T. Speedway and a penalty of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) on Mr. Karantonis Antonios, 2nd officer on Board S. T. Speedway under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.I also order that the import duty amounting to Rs. 22,815.00 leviable on 39 cases of whisky be paid by the Master of the vessel, Mr. Makcos Aranoutakis.I also co...
Tag this Judgment!Gangadhar Marar Vs. the State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-20-1971
Reported in: 1972CriLJ954
ORDERK. Sadasivan, J.1. The petitioner. Ganga-dhara Marar is the accused in S.C. 25/71 on the file of the Sessions Judge. Tellicherry. He is charged with having attempted to murder Sri C. H. Mohammed Koya, the honourable Home Minister of Kerala by throwing an acid bulb at him while he was camping in the Inspection bungalow, Tellicherry on 4-1-70. The accused was immediately arrested and the case was registered as crime No. 2/70. The trial in the sessions court commenced on 9-8-71. The trial went on till 16-8-71. in the course of which almost all the material witnesses were examined. On 16-8-71 the doctor who treated the accused was examined; but before her examination could be completed the accused filed Cr. M. P. 174/71 expressing his intention to move 'higher court' for withdrawal of the case from the file of the learned Sessions Judge as he apprehended that it was not possible for him to get a free, fair and impartial trial. On that petition the learned Judge ordered:If the accused ...
Tag this Judgment!Ouseph Vs. Govindankutty Menon and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-17-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Ker176
P. Subramonian Poti, J. 1. The only dispute in the appeal concerns the question whether plaintiff is entitled to a decree charged on plaint item No. 11 also. That item along With certain other items of properties, was charged under a simple mortgage Ext. P-1 dated 24-5-1949 for an amount of Rs. 750 received thereunder. Though the executant purported to mortgage that item also, On that day he had no title to that property. In fact the consideration received under Ext. P-1 was for the purpose of taking a sale deed of that item of property and it was later, by Ext. D-5 sale deed, that the said item was acquired by the executant on 3-2-1950. Therefore on the date of execution of Ext. P-1, in regard to item No. 11, the executant had no title. He acquired title after a few months and thereafter, on his death, his heir the 1st defendant sold the property to one Reppai under Ext. D-4 dated 21-1-1954 who in turn sold the properly to 4th defendant under Ext. D-3 dated 22-3-1961. The claim of the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›