Kerala Court April 1966 Judgments
P. Narayana Pillai Vs. Kunju Kunju Gopalan
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker145
T.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, J.1. The decree-holder is the appellant and the appeal is filed against the order of the appellate court dismissing the execution petition 733 of 1960 filed by the decree-holder on 9-12-1960.2. in execution of the decree, the right of the second defendant in 20 cents of land was sold in court auction on 14-12-1956 in full satisfaction of the decree debt. The sale was confirmed on 6-7-1957. When the decree-holder auction purchaser applied for delivery of property, he was obstructed from taking delivery of the property by a stranger to the decree. The application filed by the auction purchaser for delivery of property after removing the obstruction was dismissed.3. Execution Petition 733 of 1960 was filed by the decree-holder on 9-12-1960 on the ground that the court sale became infructuous because of the dismissal of the application filed by him for delivery of properly after removing the obstruction. The execution court allowed the decree-holder to take furthe...
Tag this Judgment!Thirumangalath Nelliotan Ammu and ors. Vs. Thirumangalath Nelliotan Go ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-1966
Reported in: AIR1966Ker294
T.C. Raghavan, J.1. An interesting and fairly important question has been raised by Mr. A Achuthan Nambiar, the counsel of the secondrespondent, as a preliminary objection. A few facts may be stated to appreciate the question.2. The second appeal came up for admission before Velu Pillai, J. along with a petition for injunction. My learned brother dismissed the second appeal in limine on 27th June 1962 observing that there was no ground for admitting; and he also dismissed the injunction petition. On 29th June a verified petition, C. M. P. No. 4588 of 1962, was fded under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that the second appeal might be treated as not requiring admission or that the earlier order might be reviewed under the inherent powers of the High Court. On 2nd July Velu Pillai, J. passed an order on the docket of the injunction petition (C. M. P. No. 4397 of 1962) that since he formed an opinion about the case and some of the averments therein, he did not wish to h...
Tag this Judgment!Jacob Mathew (A.) Vs. Professor of Medicine, Medical College and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-1966
Reported in: (1966)IILLJ638Ker
V.P. Gopalan Nambiar, J.1. The petitioner is a student, fourth-year M.B.B.S. class, of the Medical College, Trivandrum. He appeared for the second-year M.B.B.S. examination in the subject of pharmacology, held at the Medical College, Trivandrum, on 1 April 1965between 2-30 and 5-30 p.m. The next morning at about 8 a.m. the petitioner went to the examination hall, for the purpose, according to the petitioner, of collecting his hall ticket which had been left there, the previous day. At the place where he wrote the examination the previous day, according to the petitioner, he found certain additional answer-books of his, which were omitted to be taken charge of and forwarded to the examiners. These were handed over to the watchman of the hall and thereafter forwarded in separate sealed covers to the examiners concerned for valuation. The pharmacology paper had to be answered in two parts--part A and part B and each part had to be valued by a separate examiner. The examiners, Dr. Samu Ayy...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›