Kerala Court November 1963 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Food Inspector, Cannanore Municipality Vs. P. Kannan, Pandavalappi Hou ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-04-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Ker261; 1964CriLJ417a
P. Govinda Menon, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Food Inspector of the Cannanore Municipality against the order of the learned Sessions Judge of Tellicherry acquitting the respondent (accused) who was convicted by the District Magistrate of Tellicberry for an offence under Section 16(1) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act--Act 37 of 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. On the morning of 24-12-61, P W 1 one of the Food Inspectors of the Cannanore municipality found the accused carrying milk for sale. He purchased one bottle of milk and after notifying that it was for the purpose of analysis duly sampled the same in the presence of witnesses. One of the sample bottles and also the price was given to the accused and Ex. P 1 is the Form VI notice prepared and the accused has acknowledged the receipt of the sample bottle in it. One of the bottles was then sent to the public analyst and his report Ex. P 2 showed that the milk contained not less than 55...
State of Kerala Vs. Veevi Ammal and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-04-1963
Reported in: 1964CriLJ93
P. Govinda Menon, J.1. The State; has filed this appeal against the order passed by the District Magistrate of Aliped setting aside the order of the Sub Magistrate of Mavslikara for feinting the bond of the respondents under Section 514 Cr.P.C.2. The first respondent was an accused in an Abkari case charged by the excise range Inspector, Marvellkara. He had executed a bail bond with the second accused as the surety to appear before the Inspector on an appointed day. They did not appear and as the Inspector was satisfied that proceedings should be taken against them' he made a report to the Sub Magistrate for action under Section 39 of the Travancore Abkari Regulation IV of 1073. Section 39 is in the following terms:When by reason of default of appearance, of a person bailed to appear before an Abkari Inspector, such officer is of opinion that proceedings should be had to compel payment of the penalty or penalties mentioned in the bond of the person bailed or of the surety or sureties h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›