Skip to content

Kerala Court July 1956 Judgments

Jul 24 1956

The Trivandrum Permanent Fund Ltd. Vs. State of Travancore-cochIn and ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-24-1956

Reported in: [1957]8STC74(Ker)

M.S. Menon, J.1. The Government of Travancore-Cochin adjusted a sum of Rs. 10,037 from the amount payable by them to their contractor, the Organic Fertilisers and Chemicals, Cochin, under Exhibit A, an agreement with the said firm for the supply of bone-meal, towards the sales tax due to the State from that firm. That the adjustment has been completed is clear from the letter of the Comptroller to the Director of Agriculture, No. D.A. 15/6/5/56-57/131 dated the 6th July, 1956.I am to inform you that the amount of Rs. 10,037 due to Messrs. Organic Fertilisers and Chemicals, Mattancherry, has been adjusted towards arrears of sales tax in the accounts of this office for 3/56 final.2. The petitioner has no doubt sufficient interest to question the adjustment. This is clear from Exhibit B, an agreement between the firm and the petitioner dated the 8th September, 1955, and Exhibit C, the power-of-attorney dated the 10th September, 1955, which were forwarded to the Government along with the c...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1956

Antony Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-13-1956

Reported in: (1957)IILLJ445Ker

M.S. Menon, J.1. The order impugned, Ex. E, reads as follows:With reference to his appeal petition dated 18 January 1956 Sri N.T. Antony, Nellikal House, Palace Ward, Alwaye, is informed that his petition is time-barred as per Rule 9(1) of the Travancore-Cochin Shops and Establishments Rules and hence rejected.The order of discharge (Ex. B.) is dated 21 December 1955 and the appeal under Section 41 of the Travancore-Cochin Shops and Establishments Act, 1125, was filed on 20 January 1956 as can be seen from Ex. D. The relevant rule [Rule 9(1) of the Travancore-Cochin Shops and Establishments Rules, 1950] reads as follows:The Deputy Commissioner of Labour shall be the appellate authority for the purpose of hearing appeals under Sub-section (2) of Section 41 and any such appeal shall be preferred by the person employed within thirty days from the date on and from which his services are dispensed with.2. Section 8 of the Travancore-Cochin Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125, provi...

Tag this Judgment!

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial