Skip to content

Kerala Court November 1956 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 07 1956

United Motor Union (Private) Ltd., Palai Vs. Road Traffic Board, Kotta ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-07-1956

Reported in: AIR1957Ker35

ORDERM.S. Menon, J.1. The petitioner is the Secretary of the United Motor Union (Private) Limited, Palai. The 1st respondent is the Road Traffic Board, Kottayam, and the 2nd respondent, the Central Road Traffic Board, Trivandrum.2. The company is the owner of a stage carriage T. C. K. 622, which was operating on the Thodupuzha-Kanjar route. The permit issued in respect of that vehicle was cancelled at a meeting of the Road Traffic Board, Kottayam held at Peermade on 20-2-1936. The order of cancellation is Ext. O which reads as follows:'Stage carriage TCK, 622 permitted to operate between Thodupuzha and Kanjar was not conducting service from 12-10-1954 due to expiry of certificate of fitness and the travelling public was put to difficulties. The permit holder has not intimated the non-operation of the service as per Rule 293 of the M. V. Rules. The explanation offered by the permit holder dated 2-1-1956 is not satisfactory or acceptable. The permit of the vehicle is cancelled.' 3. The p...


Nov 06 1956

V.N. Rama Iyer Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-06-1956

Reported in: AIR1957Ker1

Varadaraja Iyengar, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiff a discharged Railway servant whose suit for damages for wrongful 'removal from the service', has been dismissed by the court below, and the only question is whether the plaintiff was removed from service by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed.2. The plaintiff v. N. Rama Iyer entered service on 28-6-1921 as a temporary relieving clerk in the South Indian Railway Company. After probation for 3 months he was confirmed as a relieving clerk. He got his first appointment as a station Master on 13-3-1934 drawing Rs. 60 and was still in that cadre when the Government of India acquired the Railway as a going concern. That was on 1-4-1944. The plaintiff was subsequently promoted to Rs. 52 in the scale of Rs. 50-60 from 1-6-1946. On 4-6-1946 the plaintiff was transferred temporarily to the Ernakulam South Station, the post of the Station Master of which had been graded as Rs 60-70 and he joined duty there on 18-4-1946...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial