Kerala Court August 1955 Judgments
State Vs. Pyloth
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-27-1955
Reported in: 1956CriLJ114
Koshi, C.J.1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Anjikairnal asking this Court to transfer a case under Section 302, I.P.C. for trial to the Trichur Sessions Court on the ground that the Anjikaimal Sessions Court has no jurisdiction to try the case. The letter of reference (omitting the unnecessary portions) reads thus:The above Sessions Case (S. C. No. X of 1955 came on for trial today before this Court, when it was discovered that the place of occurrence is.... Koratti Padinjarae Muri, within the jurisdiction of the Trichur Sessions Court. The offence with which the accused is charged is one of murder.Immediately after receiving the stab wound, the victim died on the spot. So no part of the crime or any consequence thereof has ensued within the jurisdiction of this Court. The police charge-sheeted the accused before the Mukundapuram Second Class Magistrate's Court (within Trichur Sessions Division).From the records of the case it is seen that the case was transferre...
Tag this Judgment!Velayudhan Pilial and Narayana Piliai Vs. Thanu Pillai and Krishnan Na ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-04-1955
Reported in: 1956CriLJ421
ORDERT.K. Joseph, J.1. This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred by the counter-petitioner in Miscellaneous Case No. 28 of 1954 of the Additional Special Sub-Divisional Magistrate's Court, Trivandrum. This case was originally pending in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Trivandrum, as Miscellaneous Case No. 15 of 1954.After the case was transferred to the Additional Court the learned Magistrate insisted that the Advocates who were originally appearing in the case should file fresh Vakalaths. This Revision has been preferred from the order directing the counter-petitioner's Advocate to file a fresh Vakalath.2. Notice of the revision petition was given to the counter petitioner as well as to the Advocate General. On behalf of the State it was submitted that the order could not be supported. The counter-petitioner did not appear in pursuance to the notice issued to him. The order in question cannot be supported.It is not as though a fresh case is filed before the additio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›