Kerala Orders Court March 2022 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Noushad P.T. vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1943 PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: NOUSHAD P.T. AGED 40 YEARS S/O. YOUSAF, KUNIYIDATH THAZHAM BHAGAM, VELLIMADAKUNNU POST, KOZHIKODE 673 012 BY ADV SHARAN SHAHIER RESPONDENT/STATE: THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031 BY ADV ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SRI. C.K. SURESH (SR.PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. In the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AJ...
Sidhique, vs the State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2022/ 11TH PHALGUNA, 1943 CRL.MC NO. 695 OF 2019 CMP 6430/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, PARAPPANANGADI PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SIDHIQUE, AGED 40 YEARS S/O.HASSAN, NAREEKOTTU MACHERI VEEDU, ALINCHUVADU, MUNNIYOOR. BY ADV NAVANEETH.N.NATH RESPONDENT/STATE: THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 682013. SMT T V NEEMA -SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..ORDERThis Crl.M.C. has been filed challenging the order by which the petition filed by the petitioner/accused to relax the bail condition was dismissed.2. The impugned order is of the year 2018. Thereis no representation for the petitioner. Most probably, the prayer might have become infructuous. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is closed. Sd/- DR.KAUSER EDAPP...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›