Kerala Orders Court November 2020 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prasanth Chandran.S vs Assistant Educational Officer
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 PETITIONER: PRASANTH CHANDRAN.S AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. CHANDRAN, LPSA, UBMC ALP SCHOOL, BY ADVS. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.) SRI.BALU TOM SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA RESPONDENTS: 1 ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER 2 THE MANAGER UBMC ALP SCHOOL, HOSDURG, KANHANGAD - 671315. * ADDL. THE HEADMASTER R3 UBMC ALP SCHOOL, HOSDURG, KANHANGAD - 671 315 R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEWS BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER:SMT.SHEEJA.C.S THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:JUDGMENTMemo dated 18/11/2020 submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner recorded. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SATHISH NINAN JUDGE rsr APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDERISSUED BY THE MANAGER DATED 01.06.2018.EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOST...
Nasar vs Sub Registrar
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.23621 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER/S: NASAR, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O ISMAYIL, D.NO.5/37, KIZHAKEVELIYATHU HOUSE, WEST VELIYATHUNADU.P.O, ERNAKULAM-683511. BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASIMHANRESPONDENT/S: SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, ERNAKULAM-682031. SRI K P HARISH, SR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.23621 OF 2020(C) 2JUDGMENTWhen this writ petition was taken up, Sri. A. Rajasimhan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, requested that this writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the right of the petitioner to move afresh at a later stage. Reserving such right, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE NS //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE...
Sudheer P.K vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.7393 OF 2020 CRIME NO.822/2020 OF OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION , PALAKKAD PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SUDHEER P.K, AGED 35 YEARS, PAZHAMKULAM HOUSE, CHUNANGAD, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD PIN-679101 BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SANDEEP RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682031 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.B.JAYASURYA SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:ORDERDat ed t hist he25t h dayofNovember,2020 APPLICATION FOR REGULAR BAIL The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.822 of 2020 of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the NDPS Act). The prosecution case, in brief, is this:2...
Vishnu Ranjan R.V. vs the Authorized Officer/Chief Manager
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.24402 OF 2020(A) PETITIONER: VISHNU RANJAN R.V. AGED 30 YEARS S/O.RAJAN HARI VISHNU, ARYANAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURM - 695 542. BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.SARIN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED, FELICITY SQUARE TC 26/56, 5TH FLOOR MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.24402 OF 2020(A) 2JUDGMENTThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to prefer a fresh Writ Petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner reserved above. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/25....
Sreekala C. Sudhan vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Crl.MC.No.5038 OF 2020(H) CRIME NO.1045/2020 OF Thoppumpady Police Station , Ernakulam PETITIONERS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND INJURED WITNESS: 1 SREEKALA C. SUDHAN, AGED 51 YEARS, W/O K.B. JAYAN, 2 ATHIRA K.J., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O K.B. JAYAN, BY ADVS. SRI.T.MADHU SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENTS/STATE AND ACCUSED:1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THOPPUMPADY POLICE STATION, 3 K.B.JAYAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O BALAKRISHNAN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 005 R1-2 BY SR.PP.AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:ORDERDated this the 25th day of November 2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C., with liberty to file a fresh Crl.M.C. The Crl.M....
Suo Motu vs the Travancore Devaswom Board
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 SSCR.No.14 OF 2020 [IN THE MATTER OF TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SABARIMALA SPECIAL COMMISSIONER REPORT SM NO.14/2020 REGARDING THE NECESSITY OF RELAXATION TO CERTAIN ESSENTIAL PLASTIC ITEMS TO PROTECT AGAINST COVID-19 PANDEMIC FROM THE COMPLETE BAN OF PLASTIC IN AND AROUND SABARIMALA SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS INITIATED]PETITIONER/S: SUO MOTU RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETRY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R1 BY SHRI.G.BIJU, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD. R2 BY SRI.T.K.ANANDAKRISHNAN, SENIOR GOVT.PLEADER. THIS SABARIMALA SPECIAL COMMISSIONER REPORT HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- SSCR.No.14 of 2020 - 2 - K. Vinod Chandran & T.R.R...
M.J.Jose vs Ranimol P Antony
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
O.P.(FC) No.446 of 2020 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 OP (FC).No.446 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.1/2020 in OP 297/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAPETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: 1 M.J.JOSE,AGED 68 YEARS S/O.JOSEPH, CHERUPUSHPAM HOUSE, VALAVOOR P.O., 2 ITHAMMA,AGED 67 YEARS W/O.M.J.JOSE, CHERUPUSHPAM HOUSE, VALAVOOR P.O., BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SRI.K.ASHOK SARAN RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & IST RESPONDENT: 1 RANIMOL P ANTONY,AGED 47 YEARS D/O.ANTONY, PULIPARAMPIL HOUSE, ITHITHANAM KARA, 2 JAYAN JOSE,AGED 47 YEARS S/O. M.J.JOSE, PULIPARAMPIL HOUSE, ITHITHANAM KARA, THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(FC) No.446 of 2020 2JUDGMENTDated this the 25th day of November 2020S.V.Bhatti, J.Heard Adv.T.M.Abdul Latiff for petitione...
Ansari vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.7690 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: ANSARI AGED 26 YEARS S/O ALEFF, NEERAMKOTTUKONAM HOUSE, UNDAPPARA, POOVACHAL P.O., PERUMKULAM VILLAGE THIRUVANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. PIN : 695575 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM - 682031 2 XXX AGED 16 YEARS XXX R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: SRI.RENJITH.T.R., PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.Dated this the 25th day of November, 2020ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner wants to withdraw this Bail application, with liberty to file it again, because the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, he is involved in crime No. Therefore, this Bail application is dismissed ...
Shahul Hameed @ Shavuppa vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
Bail Appl..No.7851 OF 2020 CRIME NO.889/2020 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station , Malappuram PN-679322 25.11.2020, A/W. B.A.No.7784 OF 2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY Bail Appl..No.7784 OF 2020 CRIME NO.888/2020 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station , Malappuram 25.11.2020, A/W.B.A.NO.7851 OF 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J B.A.Nos.7784 & 7851 of 2020 Dated this the 25th day of November, 2020ORDERAfter arguing for some time, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will withdraw these bail applications with liberty to file it again after some time. Therefore, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it again after some time. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE cms...
Shahul Hameed @ Shavuppa vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala Orders
Decided on: Nov-25-2020
Bail Appl..No.7851 OF 2020 CRIME NO.889/2020 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station , Malappuram PN-679322 25.11.2020, A/W. B.A.No.7784 OF 2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY Bail Appl..No.7784 OF 2020 CRIME NO.888/2020 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station , Malappuram 25.11.2020, A/W.B.A.NO.7851 OF 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J B.A.Nos.7784 & 7851 of 2020 Dated this the 25th day of November, 2020ORDERAfter arguing for some time, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will withdraw these bail applications with liberty to file it again after some time. Therefore, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it again after some time. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE cms...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »