Karnataka Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Manjula W/O S Manjunatha vs Smt. Munni W/O Mabu Sab
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100488 OF 2022 (A-) BETWEEN: SMT. MANJULA W/O S. MANJUNATHA, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. JEAN TAILORING WORK, R/O. PLOT NO. 154/155, HANUMAN NAGAR, NEAR HAMPI VIDYARANYA SCHOOL BALLARI- 583101. APPELLANT (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. MUNNI W/O MABU SAB, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOME MAKER R/O. 7TH WARD, MURNAMDOR STREET, BESIDE OMKARAPPA HOUSE, SANDUR- 583119, DIST. BALLARI. Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB RESPONDENT DESHNUR (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC. 378(4) OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT DATED 24.08.2022 IN C.C.NO. 318/2020 PASSED THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BALLARI, AND CONVICT THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR WITH COST IN THE INTE...
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100861 OF 2019 C/W. MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100858 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100859 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100860 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100862 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100863 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100864 OF 2019, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101658 OF 2021, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101659 OF 2021, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101660 OF 2021, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101661 OF 2021,Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101903 OF 2021, COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101904 OF 2021 BENCH Date: 2025.11.29 11:51:35 +0530 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101905 OF 2021. IN MFA NO. 100861/2019 BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MARKHA...
Smt Manjavva D/O Deekappa Hosamani vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SMT MANJAVVA D/O DEEKAPPA HOSAMANI VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnatak...
M/S Sri. Sai. Venkateshwara Cotton Mills vs M/S Kedar Enterprises
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100497 OF 2022 (A-) BETWEEN: M/S. SRI. SAI. VENKATESHWARA COTTON MILLS, R/BY ITS PROP. RAVI KUMAR, R/O. DOOR NO.19 D/1, SREE BALAJI NILAYA, M.B. NAAR, BALLARI, BALLARI- 583101. APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANUSHA L., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. KEDAR ENTERPRISES REP BY ITS PROP: NIRANJANA MURTHY, R/O. SHIVA NILAYA, BEHIND SHETTY GARAJ, SAGAR ROAD, SHIVAMOGA- 577201. RESPONDENTDigitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE) DESHNUR Location: HIGH THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C., COURT OF KARNATAKA SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THEJUDGMENT DATED 16.07.2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE IIIADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BALLARI IN CC NO. 455/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF N.I ACT AND PUNISH THE RESPONDENT BY ALLOWING THE COMPLAINT OF THE APPELLANT AND FURTHER BE PLEASE TO GRANT ANY OTHER RELIEF OR...
The Managing Director vs Balasaheb @ Babasaheb S/O. Venkatigolave
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100110 OF 2021 (A-) BETWEEN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GEM SUGARS LIMITED, KUNDARGI, BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. DAYANAND S/O. KRISHANA PATIL, AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. CANE SUPERVISOR, R/O: KUNDARAGI, TQ. BILGI, DIST. BAGALKOT. APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: BALASAHEB @ BABASAHEB S/O. VENKATIGOLAVE, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. CONTRACTOR R/O. AMBEVADAGAON, TQ. DHARUR- 431124, DIST. BEED, STATE: MAHARASTRADigitally signed by RESPONDENT SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR (SERVED) Location: HIGH COURT OF THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C., KARNATAKA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PC NO.486/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL OFFENCESPUNISHABLE U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERDATED 04/02/2020 DISMISSING THE IA SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY OF 206 DAYS AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISSING PC NO.486/2016 EFFEC...
Sri. H M Vageeshaiah vs the Executive Officer,
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SRI. H M VAGEESHAIAH VS. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER,] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the pa...
Shri. Ramesh S/O. Jambanna Beleri vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI. RAMESH S/O. JAMBANNA BELERI VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka...
Navanath S/O Arjun Dolers vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.103147 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: NAVANATH S/O. ARJUN DOLERS, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. 118, KUBRA, MEETHA GHAR, RAMAMATAVADI, WADALA EAST, MUMBAI-400037. PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY OLD HUBLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY HCGP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,Digitally signed AT DHARWAD-580001. by RESPONDENT SREEDHARAN (BY SRI. M.B. GUNDAWADE, ADDL. SPP.) BANGALORE SUSHMALAKSHMI THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OFLocation: High CR.P.C. (483 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO, ENLARGECourt of PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.10 ON BAIL IN SC.5062/2022 ARISING OUTKarnataka OF CR.NO.90/2020, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 120(B), 302, 303, 201, 387, 506, R/W 149 OF IPC AND 25 OF ARMS ACT OF OLD HUBLI P.S. P...
Smt. Sridevi W/O Sharanbasavaraj Hulyal vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
CRL.A NO. 100332/2019 (A)IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SMT. SRIDEVI W/O SHARANBASAVARAJ HULYAL VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR GENERALORAL ORDERCase is called out. No representation on behalf of Appellant. Perused the records. Inspite of granting sufficient opportunity to the Appellant, the Appellant has failed to comply the office objections. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Sd/- (ADDL. REGISTRAR GENERAL) VG List No.:1 Sl No.: 30...
Shri. Gajanan Urban Co-Op Credit Society Ltd, Hubballi vs Bharati W/O ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI. GAJANAN URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, HUBBALLI VS. BHARATI W/O PRAVEEN ANGADI] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »