Karnataka Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amanullakhan S/O Changezkhan Khanjade vs Mustaqahammad S/O Ibrahimsab
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100271 OF 2023 (A-) BETWEEN: AMANULLAKHAN S/O CHANGEZKHAN KHANJADE, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. HORAKERI STREET, SAVANUR, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI- 581118. APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE) AND: MUSTAQAHAMMAD S/O IBRAHIMSAB LAKSHMESHWAR, AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KATEWADI CHAL, BUSTAND ROAD, INFRONT OF KSRTC DEPO SAVANUR, Digitally signed bySAMREEN AYUB TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI- 581118.DESHNUR RESPONDENTLocation: HIGH (SERVED)COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC. 378(4) OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THEJUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 05.04.2023 PASSED IN C.C.NO.AND CONSEQUENTLY CONVICT THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,JUDGME...
Abdul Khadir S/O Husensab Shirahatti vs Govinda S/O Prakash Bhasme
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100262 OF 2023 (A-) BETWEEN: ABDUL KHADIR S/O HUSENSAB SHIRAHATTI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: SANKANNAVAR LAYOUT, APMC YARD, GADAG- 582101. APPELLANT (BY SRI. R.M. JAVED, ADVOCATE) AND: GOVINDA S/O PRAKASH BHASME, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: SHARANA BASAVESHWAR NAGAR, KANAGINAHAL ROAD, 1ST CROSS, NEAR POOL BAZAR, HOUSE NO DWD/836, BETAGERI, GADAG- 582102. RESPONDENTDigitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB (BY SRI. S.S. KOLIWAD, ADVOCATE) DESHNUR Location: HIGH THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC. 378(4) OF COURT OF KARNATAKA CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS ANS SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT, I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC-I, GADAG IN CC NO. 3031/2021 DATED 31.03.2023 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881 AND CONVICT THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd., vs the Special Land Acquistion Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD., VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigama Ltd. vs the Special Land Acquisition Office ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD. VS. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) ...
Ramagouda Appasaheb Patil, vs Ramchandra Dadu Gajannavar,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100347 OF 2015 (SP) BETWEEN:1. RAMAGOUDA APPASAHEB PATILSINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1A. SANVAKKA APPASAHEB PATIL, AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KUTHALI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 1B. MANGAL D/O. RAMAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, YASHAVANT R/O. KUTHALI, NARAYANKAR TQ. CHIKKODI, Digitally signed by YASHAVANT DIST. BELAGAVI. NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.12.08 10:00:49 +0530 1C. IRAGOUDA S/O. RAMAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KUTHALI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 1D. BASAGOUDA S/O. RAMAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 23 YEARS, -2- OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KUTHALI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B.S. KAMATE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. RAMCHANDRA DADU GAJANNAVAR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KUTHALI, TQ. CHIKKODI-591201, DIST. BELAGAVI.2. ADINATH RAMACHANDRA GAJANNAVAR,AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTU...
Varada Prakash S/O Varada Hanumantha Setty vs C. R. Jagadeesh S/O Rang ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 103476 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VARADA PRAKASH S/O VARADA HANUMANTHA SETTY, AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. 3RD WARD, 5TH CROSS, PATEL NAGAR, HOSAPETE, TQ. AND DIST. HOSAPETE (VIJAYANAGAR), PIN CODE-583 201. PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANESH RAIBAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: C.R. JAGADEESH S/O RANGANARAYANA SETTY, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND PETTY MERCHANT, R/O. KOTTRESHWARA GENERAL STORE, OPP. FIRE STATION OFFICE, SANDUR ROAD, HOSAPETE, TQ. AND DIST. HOSAPETE (VIJAYANAGAR), PIN CODE-583 201. RESPONDENT CHANDRASHEKAR (BY SRI. SATISH M.S., ADVOCATE) LAXMAN Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:41 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE +0530 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR ...
Sadiq S/O Allabax Nadaf vs Noorjahan S/O Mansur Nadaf
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO.102635 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SADIQ S/O. ALLABAX NADAF AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: RIKCHAW DRIVER, R/O. GANDHI NAGAR, BELAGAVI. PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAM P.GHORPADE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. NOORJAHAN S/O. MANSUR NADAF AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER, R/O. NEW SHAHAPURI NEAR NATARAJ LODGE, INFORNT OF MASIJID, KOLHAPUR, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI MAHARATSTRA STATE. KATTIMANI Date: 2025.12.16 11:21:20 +05302. SHAMSHAD W/O. SHOUKAT NADAF AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. H.NO.1209, KOLHAPUR NAKA, SHIVAJI ROAD, TAJMAHAL HOTEL, TQ: GADHINGLAJ, DIST: KOLHAPURE, MAHARATSTRA STATE.3. MAMATAJ W/O. FIROZ NADAF AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. DATTAWAD, TQ: SHIROLE, -2- DIST: KOLHAPUR, MAHARASTRA STATE.4. YASEEN S/O. ALLABAX NADAF AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: MILITARY SERVICE, R/O. 14, ENGINEERING REGIMENT,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »