Skip to content

Karnataka Court February 2020 Judgments

Feb 17 2020

Chikkappa S/o Ramalingappa Masali Vs. The Chief Secretary And Ors

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Feb-17-2020

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT APPEAL NO.200108/2016 (S-REG) Between: Chikkappa S/o Ramalingappa Masali Aged about 54 years Occ: Literate Assistant R/o In the office of the Assistant Executive Engineer Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. Sub-Division No.1 Mattihal-586 210 Tq. B.Bagewadi District: Vijayapur Appellant (By Sri S. D.Sagari, Advocate) And:1. The Chief Secretary Amended & deleted Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. as per order dated 1st Floor, K.R.Circle 04.01.2018 Bengaluru-1 2. The Chief Engineer Managing Director K.B.J.N.L., Almatti 2 Tq. B.Bagewadi District: Vijayapur-586201 3. The Chief Engineer K.B.J.N.L., I.B.C. Sub-Division No.21 Kembhavi District: Yadgiri 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer M.L.I. Sub Division No.1 Mattihal Tq. B.Bagewadi District: Vijayapur-586 201 Respondents (By Sri Sanjay M.Joshi, Advocate for R2 to R4; R1 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2020

Krishnappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-17-2020

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.13029/2015(KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT66YEARS R/O AMRUTHA HALLI YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560092 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560009. 3 . ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560052 2 4 . SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560001. 5 . TAHASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK AND ADDL. TALUK BANGALORE-560009. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED1011.2011 AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT-4 IN EXERC...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2020

Smt K Saraswathi Vs. Sri C Shekar

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-17-2020

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL APPEAL No.511 of 2019 BETWEEN SMT. K.SARASWATHI, W/O. KARUPSAMY, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.801, 6TH CROSS C, 3RD MAIN, PRAKASHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 021. ... APPELLANT [BY SMT. ARASI K.T., FOR SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATES]. AND SRI. C.SHEKAR, S/O. CHINNAPPA GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT39YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9 & 10, SUBRAMANYA SWAMY NILAYA, 4TH MAIN ROAD, GANESHA BLOCK, WARD NO.12, 8TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI TENT ROAD, NANDHINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 096. ... RESPONDENT [BY SRI. MADDURAPPA D., ADVOCATE]. * * * THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S378(4) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED1503.2013, PASSED BY THE XIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C. NO.17243/2009, ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S138OF THE N.I. ACT. 2 THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL DISPOSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELI...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2020

Tvs Motor Company Limited Vs. Kongovi Private Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-17-2020

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.3887 OF2020(GM CPC) BETWEEN: TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED A COMPANY UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.12, KHADER NAWAZ KHAN ROAD NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 006. REP. BY MR. P. SUDHIR AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY PETITIONER (BY SRI.S. VIJAYASHANKAR, SR.ADVOCATES ALONG WITH SRI. ANIRUDH, ADVOCATE) AND: KONGOVI PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.377, 10TH CROSS, 4TH PHASE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU-560 058. ...RESPONDENT (BY MISS. MANEESHA KONGVI FOR C/R1.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0702.2020 ANNEXURE-A PASSED ON I.A.NO.2/2019 IN COM O.S.NO.2451/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE COURT OF THE LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, 2 BENGALURU (COURT HALL...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

Prakash Madiwalayya Mathapati, Vs. The State of Karnataka,

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY2020BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRL . A . N O. 2592/2011BETWEEN :1. PRAKASH MADIWALAYYA MATHAPATI, AGE:41. YEARS, OCC: VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, R/O. HULKI NINGAPUR SARJA, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS1a) MAHANANDA W/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:48. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. 1(b) PRUTHVIRAJ S/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:28 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVE, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. 1(c) SANJEEVKUMAR S/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:23. YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. (BY SRI SRIHARSH A. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE) AND : - APPELLANTS Crl. A. No.2592/2011 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, POLICE INSPECTOR, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BAGALKOT, THROUGH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD. (BY SRI...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

Sambhram Charitable Trust Vs. Union Of India

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

1 INDEX OF ORDER Sl. Description Page Nos. No.Cause title 3-23 I Facts of the case 4-31 II Statement of objections on behalf 31-50 of Respondent No.2 III Memo filed by the State 5-52 Government IV Arguments advanced by the 52-56 learned counsel for the petitioners V Arguments advanced on behalf of 56-57 the State Government VI Arguments advanced by Sri N. 57-61 Khetty, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 MCI VII Arguments advanced by Sri 61-70 Adithya Sondhi, learned senior counsel for Respondent Nos.52 to 108 students VIII Point for determination 70 IX Determination 71 X Importance of Education 76-77 XI Objections filed by the Medical 77-80 Council of India in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 2 Objections filed by the State XII Government in W.P. Nos.4557- 80-82 4561/2019 XIII Statement of objections by the 82-85 College in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 XIV Decision in W.P. Nos.4557- 85-88 4561/2019 dated 22.8.2019 filed by the students XV Dual stand taken by the MCI and 88-91 the State Gove...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

Sri Suhail Rehaman Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.461/2020 (KLR-CON) BETWEEN: SRI SUHAIL REHAMAN, S/O MOHAMMED OMER ABDUL REHAMAN SAIT AGED ABOUT55YERAS R/AT NO.201, PRESTIGE ORCHID37BERLIE STREET NEAR HOCKEY STADIUM LANGFORD TOWN, MUSEUM ROAD BENGALURU-560 025. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. B.V. VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE-570001. 2 3 . TAHASILDHAR MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570001. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) **** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY. NO.177/5 AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO FORMALLY ISSUE AN ORDER OF CONVERSION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION95OF KARNA...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

State Of Karnataka Vs. Sri P Giridhar Kudva

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO.22473/2015 (S-KAT) BETWEEN:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT (ADMN), VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-1.2. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-9.3. SRI S.Y. KUMBAR, RETIRED DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND INQUIRING AUTHORITY, C/O THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-9.4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), PARK HOUSE, BENGALURU-1. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI VENKATA SATYANARAYAN, HCGP) 2 AND: SRI. P.GIRIDHAR KUDVA, S/O. P. KRISHNA KUDVA (LATE), AGED ABOUT72YEARS, RETIRED DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, No.268/3/2, 37TH CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-82. RESPONDENT (BY SRI KARTIKEYAN B.S. IYER, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

The State Of Karnataka Vs. M/s Anand Investment Private Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL No.582 OF2018(GM-KIADB) BETWEEN:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S.BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU 560 001 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONG WITH SRI. T. L. KIRAN KUMAR, AGA ) AND:1. M/S. ANAND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT70 NAGINDAS MASTER ROAD FORT, MUMBAI 400 023 2 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MRS. ROSHEN MINOCHER NENTIN M/S. ANAND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED.2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.14/3, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. G. RAGHAVAN, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR ...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020

Shabana Salahudheen Vs. Union Of India

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2020

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14h DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NOS. 29365-29368 OF2018(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS. 29817-29818/2018 & 29820- 29822/2018, 29823-29828/2018, 29874/2018 & 29876-29879/2018, 30406-30411/2018 (EDN-RES) IN W.P. NOS. 29365-29368/2018: BETWEEN:1. SHABANA SALAHUDHEEN, D/O P P SALAHUDHEEN, R/AT #35/10, 17TH CROSS, A-205, AKSHAY ORCHID, VEERANAPALYA, AC POST, NAGWARA, BANGALORE 560 045.2. VARUN MOHOD, AGED24YEARS, S/O NARENDRA MOHOD, R/AT NEAR PANDEY NURSING HOME, ARARIPURA, CHINDWARA, MADHYA PRADESH 480 001.3. POONAM NAG, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, D/O RANA NAG, R/AT JALJAD, POST CHHATAPIPAL, DT:BALANGIR, STATE-ODISHA 767 002. 24. ARUN MOHAN, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, S/O MADHAVAM, CHETHUKADAVU POST, MIE KUNNAMANGALAM, CALICUT DISTRICT673571. KERALA. ... PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DE...

Tag this Judgment!

  • Last »


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial