Karnataka Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Daniel Anand Vs. G.N. Sujatha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
(Prayer: This MFA filed under Section 55(1) of the Divorce Act 1869 Section 19(C) of the Family Courts Act 1984, against the Judgment and Decree Dated 01.02.2017 passed in M.C.75/2014 on the file of the Prl. Family Court at Mysuru, allowing the Petition filed under Section 10(1)(X) of the Divorce Act, for Dissolution of Marriage.) S. Sujatha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the I-Additional Prl. Family Court, Mysuru ('Family Court' for short) in M.C.No.75/2014 directing the appellant herein to pay permanent alimony of Rs.5 lakhs to the respondent. 2. Facts in brief are: The appellant and the respondent got married to each other as per Christian Customary Rights on 28.12.2016 at Bethel Brothern Church, Krishnamurthypuram, Mysuru. The couple had a female child by name Grace Jacintha in the wedlock, who is now aged about 8 years. Due to the matrimonial disharmony between the couple, the appellant herein filed petition under Section 10 (1) (x) of the ...
Thayamma Vs. Kumaraa and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S against the Judgment and Award Dated: 20.07.2011 passed in MVC No.120/2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, JMFC, Mact, Arkalgud, partly allowing the Claim Petition for Compensation and seeking Enhancement of Compensation.) 1. Appellant is the claimant. Being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 20th July 2011 made in MVC No.120/2009 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Arkalgud (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal" for short), fastening liability on the owner of the vehicle to compensate the claimant he has filed this appeal. 2. Appellant is the wife of deceased Ramegowda, she filed a claim petition contending that on 15-04-2009, the deceased Ramegowda after finishing Friday cattle business at Arkalgud, while returning to his village on Arkalgud-Mallipatna Road at about 4.30 p.m., on the left side of the road, near Adikebommanahalli, a goods auto bearing Registration No.KA-42/S-1404 came from opposite direction in a rash and negligen...
H.R. Venkatarama Reddy Vs. V. Bise Gowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the Judgment of Conviction passed by the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC., Srinivasapura in C.C.No.284/2012 and which is also confirmed by the Order Dated 17.01.2017 passed by the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Kolar in Crl. A.no.11/2014 and to acquit the petitioner.) 1. Both the counsel and respondent are present. The respondent is duly identified by his counsel. 2. Sri. C.P.Praveen, Advocate for respondent files application under Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act for compounding the offence. 3. It is submitted that the revision petitioner/accused is serving sentence in the Central Prison, Bengaluru in pursuance of the conviction warrant issued by the trial Court in the present case. Therefore, he seeks exemption for the presence of the revision petitioner/ accused to compound the offence. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has received a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupe...
Sri Daniel Anand Vs. Smt G N Sujatha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF JULY2017PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA M.F.A.No.3929/2017 (FC) BETWEEN : SRI DANIEL ANAND S/O JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT # 576, RAMABHAI NAGARA MYSORE-570008. ... APPELLANT (BY SMT.S.SUSHEELA, ADVOCATE) AND : SMT.G.N.SUJATHA W/O DANIEL ANAND D/O NARASIMHA AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT No.122/A, RAILWAY QUARTERS MYSORE SOUTH, MYSORE-570008. THIS MFA FILED UNDER SECTION551) OF THE DIVORCE ACT1869SECTION19c) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT1984 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0102.2017 PASSED IN M.C.75/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER Section 10(1)(x) OF THE DIVORCE ACT, FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. RESPONDENT2THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON0507.2017, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order passed b...
Vinay Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13h DAY OF JULY, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1195/2017 BETWEEN: VINAY S/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT20YEARS R/AT THANGALAGERE VILLAGE BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT PETITIONER (BY SRI.D.MOHAN KUMAR, ADV.,) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KEREGODU POLICE MANDYA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560 001 RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.VISHWAMURTHY, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION439OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.194/2015 OF KERAGODU POLICE STATION, MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S376OF IPC AND SECTIONS4 8, 12 AND18OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:2. ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent.2. The petitioner is charg...
R. Kempamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Department of Panch ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-12-2017
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the Impugned Order passed by the R3 Dt.26.11.2016 vide Annex-E and to direct the Respondent No.5 not to form or distribute any sites to any persons in the Land Bearing Sy.No.116 of Shivanapura, Dasanapura Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk and etc.) 1. Petitioners are the villagers of Shivanapura and Thimmabovipalya villages in Dasanapura Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk. They have approached this Court challenging the order passed by 3rd respondent - Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore on 26.11.2016 vide Annexure-E exercising his power under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act') thereby de-reserving an extent of 2 acres 20 guntas of land comprised in Sy.No.116 earmarked as government gomal land for the purpose of allotment in favour of siteless persons of the village under "Ashraya Vajpayee Housing Scheme". 2. Main grievance ma...
Harpeet Singh Dhesi and Another Vs. Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palik ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-12-2017
(Prayer: This W.P. is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the Order Dated 08-02-2017 passed by the R2 vide Annex-A and grant an Interim Order to stay the Order Dated 08-02-2017 passed by the R2 vide Annex-A and continue the name of the petitioner in the Assessment Registers of the R1 in respect of the Schedule Property. These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the Order Dated 02-03-2016 passed by the R3 Vide Annex-H and quash the Order Dated 16-03-2016 passed by the R3 vide Annex-L in respect of document No.P/7355/2-15-16 and etc.,) Mr.P.N.Rajeshwawra, Adv. for petitioner (Harpreet Singh Dhesi) in WP 9948/17 Mr.Ashok B.Patil, Adv.for petitioner in WP 48513/16 Mr.I.G.Gachchinamath, Adv. for Respondents-BBMP Mr.Anandeeshwara, HCGP for State Mr.C.M.Nagabhushana, Adv. for R6 in W.P.48513/16 (Ms.Madhavi) 1. Both these petitions are being disposed of by the common order. 2. W.P.No.9948/2017 has...
Kanta Devi Malpani Vs. The Joint Director, Town Planning Department (N ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-12-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the endorsement dated 21/10/2015 issued by the first Respondent vide Annexure A and consequently issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to take into consideration the Development Rights Certificates at Annexures N, O, P, and Q and accord sanction to the petitioner's plan sanction Application dated 25/08/2014 vide Annexure B within a period of one month from the date of disposal of the writ petition.) Mr. Ganapathi Hegde for Dua Associates for Petitioner Mr. V. Sreenidhi, Advocate for R1 and R2 BBMP) 1. The matter pertains to TDRs issued by Respondent - BBMP and utilization thereof by the petitioner.2. The learned counsel for the Respondent - BBMP has placed before the Court a Memo filed today along with the Rules known as the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Benefit of Development Rights) Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "2016 Rules" for short) publis...
Sri Abdul Kareem Telgi S/O Late Ladsab Telgi Vs. The State of Karnatak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE11H DAY OF JULY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1187 OF2007CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1123 OF2007C/W C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1241 OF2007CRL.A.NO.1187 OF2007 BETWEEN: SRI ABDUL KAREEM TELGI AGED ABOUT46YEARS, S/O LATE LADSAB TELGI, PUNE, RESIDENT OF SHERIN MANZIL, NO.7, CUFFE PARADE, MUMBAI. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI M.T.NANAIAH, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG WITH SRI BALASUBRAMANYA B.N., ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MADIWALA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, NOW BY C.B.I., NEW DELHI. ... RESPONDENT2(BY SRI P.PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) ***** OF2004-CONVICTING FAKE STAMP PAPER CASES), BENGALURU THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED1906.2007 PASSED BY THE XXXV ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SPECIAL SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL SESSIONS JUDGE (SPECIAL COURT) TO TRY IN SPL.C.C.NO.213 THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED-1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER ...
Smt. Machi Poojarthi Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-10-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JULY, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.No.8574/2016 & W.P.Nos.48997-998/2016 (LR-RES) BETWEEN SMT.MACHI POOJARTHI, AGEDA BOUT73YEARS, D/O LATE MARLI POOJARTHI, HEDDARI MANE, HEMMADI VILLAGE, VANDSE HOBLI, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT, PIN CODE:576201. ... PETITIONER (By Sri VENKATESH C. & Sri SHANKAR REDDY C., ADVS.) AND1 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT, PIN CODE-576 201. SRI RANGANATH KAMATH, S/O RAMAKRISHNA KAMATH, AGED ABOUT73YEARS, R/AT GANGOLI VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT, PIN OCDE:576 201. ... RESPONDENTS (By Smt.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1; Sri A.ANANDA SHETTY A., ADV. FOR C/R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT.30.11.2015 MADE IN APPEAL6282007 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-M, ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU AND ALLOW THE SAID APPEAL; AND TO QUASH THE IMPUGN...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »