Karnataka Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bangalore Development Authority Kumara Park West, Bangalore, Represent ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in W.P.Nos.5343-5345 and 5575 of 2014 dated 19.2.2014.) Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, CJ. These are appeals against the judgment and order dated February 19, 2014, passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.5343 to 5345 of 2014 and Writ Petition No.5575 of 2014. All matters listed together shall be considered separately in view of peculiar nature of these appeals.2. The lands of the writ petitioners were acquired for formation of the Arkavathi layout. In lieu of the lands that were acquired from the writ petitioners, certain lands were given to the writ petitioners by the Bengaluru Development Authority.3. The writ petitioners requested for dropping of their lands from the acquisition on the ground that their lands did not come under the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of India in the case of 'BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS versus BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ...
Bapugouda and Others Vs. The State Through P.S. Kembhavi
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. praying to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and order passed in Spl. Case No.23/2010 on the file of the Session Judge at Yadgiri dated : 17.8.2011 convicting the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 504, 506 R/w 149 of IPC and U/Sec.3(1) (x) of SC/STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, in Spl. Case No.23/2010 dated: 17-08-2011, in view of the reasons as stated above, in the interest of justice and equity.) This appeal has been preferred by appellants - accused nos.1 to 18 by assailing the judgment of conviction passed by the Prl. District Sessions Judge, Yadgiri in Spl.Case No.23/2010 dated : 17.08.2011. 2. The genesis of the case of the prosecution is that on 6.7.2008 at about 5.30 p.m., the complainant had been to his land situated at Kudalgi village, at that time, the accused persons by constituting an unlawful...
Hanumanth Vs. The State of Karnataka, Through P.S.I., Rept. By the S.P ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
(Prayer: This Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 R/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying that this Hon'ble Court to set aside the Judgment and order of conviction dated: 05-01-2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.15/2010 by the Prl. District and Sessions Judge Raichur wherein the Prl. Sessions Judge has confirmed the Judgment and order of conviction passed in criminal case No.302/2007 by the J.M.F.C., Court at Lingasugur on 20-01-201 and consequently acquit the petitioner.) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused by assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence in criminal appeal No.15/2010 dated 05.1.2012 passed by Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Raichur whereunder the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by JMFC Court Lingasagur in CC No.302/2007 dated 21-10-2010 has been confirmed under sections 279, 304-A of IPC and also under Sec. 187 of M.V. Act. 2. The gist of the allegation as per the complaint are that, on 16-04-2007 at about 6.45 p.m., wh...
Raja Ramappa Nayak and Others Vs. The State Through P.S. Kembhavi
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. praying to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and order passed in S.C.No.63/2010 on the file of the Session Judge at Yadgiri dated : 17.8.2011 convicting the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 504, 506, 509 R/w 149 of IPC and acquit the accused / appellants of the alleged offences.) This appeal has been preferred by appellants - accused nos.1 to 6 by assailing the judgment of conviction passed by the Prl. Sessions Judge, Yadgiri in S.C.No.63/2010 dated : 17.08.2011. 2. The genesis of the case of the prosecution is that on 6.7.2008 the complainant was removing waste things in her land bearing sy.nos.63 and 102 at Kudalagi village, at that time, at about 5.00 or 5.30 p.m., one Ramappa Naik S/o Lachmappa Naik of Surpur along with Siddanna Bangeri, Tirupati S/o Chandappa Kanagundi of Kudalagi village and 8 to 10 other persons trespassed into her land by constituting an unlawful asse...
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Bengaluru Regional Office, Bengaluru Rep. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award Dated:13.01.2017 passed in MVC No.5525/2015 on the file of the Member, Principal MACT, Bangalore, (SCCH-1) awarding compensation of Rs.17,32,500/- With interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award Dated:13.01.2017 passed in MVC No.1206/2016 on the file of the Member, Principal MACT, Bangalore, (SCCH-1), awarding compensation of Rs.15,68,000/- With interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.) K.S. Mudagal, J.Since, these two appeals arise out of the same accident, they are taken up together for disposal. The appellant in these two cases is respondent no.2, respondents 1 and 2 in MFA No.3361/2017 are the claimants in MVC No.5525/2015 and respondents 1 to 3 in MFA No.3362/2017 are the claimants in MVC No.1206/2016. Respondent no.3 in MFA No.3361 and respondent no.4 in MFA No.3362/2017 i...
Micro Hitech Industries Vs. Uttam Gautam Appliances
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JULY, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S CHAUHAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.610/2017 (IPR) BETWEEN: MICRO HITECH INDUSTRIES A SOLE PROPRIETARY CONCERN OF COUTAM KUMAR BABULAL (HUF) HAVING OFFICE AT NO.155/8, 1ST FLOOR S.P. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002 REP. BY ITS KARTA & PROPRIETOR SRI GOUTAM KUMAR BABULAL (BY SRI HARSHIT TOLIA A/W SRI RAJENDRA BHANSALI, ADVs. FOR SRI SANJAY H SETHIYA, ADV.) AND: UTTAM GAUTAM APPLIANCES A SOLE PROPRIETARY CONCERN HAVING OFFICE AT NO.4/1 CELLAR, GR MILL COMPOUND MADHUGIRI ROAD ANTHRASNAHALLI, INDUSTRIAL AREA SHED NO.5, TUMKUR-572106 REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR SRI UTTAM KUMAR ... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAKSHIT K N, ADV. FOR C/R) 2 THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION96R/W ORDER XLI RULES1& 2 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED3101.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.2835/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT ...
National Institute of Rock Mechanics Vs. Assistant Commissioner and Ex ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JULY2017BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.25568 OF2017(GM-RES) BETWEEN : National Institute of Rock Mechanics A society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, an autonomous institute under the Ministry of Mines, Government of India, Outer Ring Road Eshwar Nagar, Banashankari 2nd Stage, Bengaluru 560 070. Represented by its Senior Scientist & Estate Officer, Rajan Babu. ... Petitioner (By Sri M.N.Kumar, Advocate) Assistant Commissioner and Executive Magistrate Kolar Sub-Division, at Kolar, Kolar District 563 101. AND:1. 2.3. City Municipal Council Robertsonpet, Robertsonpet, Kolar Gold Fields -563 122. Represented by its Commissioner Karnataka General Labour Union No.16/7, Munikadirappa Layout, Graphite India Road, Hoody, Bengaluru 560 048. Represented by State General Secretary. Ex-services Association, Kolar District BEML Nagar post, Kolar Gold Fields...
N. Varalakshmi Vs. N. Mahendra and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-14-2017
(Prayer: This RFA is filed under section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dt:31.07.2007 passed in O.S.No.10024/1998 on the file of the XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit for partition.) 1. This plaintiff's appeal arises out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.10024/1998 passed by the XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has partly decreed the suit of the plaintiff for partition and separate possession of her 1/12th share in the suit schedule properties as against her claim for equal share. 2. Defendant nos.1 and 2 are the brothers and defendant no.3 is the sister of the plaintiff. The subject matter of the suit are lands bearing Sy.No.57/7B1 measuring 5 guntas and Sy.No.56/1 measuring 26 guntas situated at Hongasandra Village limits, Bangalore South Taluk. 3. The case of the plaintiff in brief is as follows: That the suit schedule properties are the self- acquire...
Nijaguni M Karadigudda Vs. Sri Subhaschchandra Kuntia
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-14-2017
1 R BSPJ & BVNJ: C.C.C.(Civil) Nos.1241 & 1244/2016 14-07-2017 ORDER These contempt petitions have been filed by Karnataka High Court Employees Welfare Association, represented by its President and one of the retired officers of the High Court of Karnataka (hereinafter, referred to as High Court) complaining about the willful disobedience of order dated 12/10/2011 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.4411/2011. The writ appeal was allowed in the following terms; Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. Consequently, the writ petition is also allowed quashing Annexure-C to the writ petition. The respondents Government is directed to place the recommendation of the Honble Chief Justice of Karnataka dated 06.10.2004 before the Cabinet at the earliest and to take appropriate decision to implement the recommendation of the Honble Chief Justice of High Court of Karnataka dated 06.10.2004 in the light of the observations made by the Apex Court in the 2 matter of UNION OF INDIA vs....
Ashok S/O Chinnappa Metagud Vs. Smt. Annapurna W/O Guruputrayya Chikka ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-14-2017
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF JULY, 2017 BEFORE R THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.S.A. NO.100238/2017 (FDP) BETWEEN: ASHOK S/O CHINNAPPA METAGUD AGE:73. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NEAR SYNDICATE BANK, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. SACHIN S MAGADUM, ADVOCATE) AND1 SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O GURUPUTRAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE:75. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.No.3623 SYNDICATE BANK, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001 2. GURUDEV S/O GURUPUTRAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE:55. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.3623 SYNDICATE BANK, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001 3. DAYANANAD S/O GURUPUTRAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE:52. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.3623 SYNDICATE BANK, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001 :2. :4. MISS VIDYAVATI D/O GURUPUTRAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE:50. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: H.NO.3623 SYNDICATE BANK, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001 5. MISS SHIVALEELA D/O GURUPUTRAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE:48. YEARS, OCC: H/W, R/O: H.NO.3623 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »