Karnataka Court June 2017 Judgments
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Udayavani Building Manipal, now repre ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award Dated:18.3.2011 passed in MVC No.1167/2008 on the file of Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, and MACT, Kundapura, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,45,000/- with interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till payment. This Appeal coming on for orders and having reserved for Judgment on 27-04-2017, this day, the Court pronounced the following:) 1. The United India Insurance Company Ltd. has filed this appeal challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and award dated 18th March 2011 passed in MVC No.1167/2008 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kundapura (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal' for short) fastening liability on them to compensate the claimants. 2. Facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as under: The respondents No.1 to 4 herein are the wife and children of deceased Ramakrishna Hebbar. They filed a claim petition contending that on 02-07-2008 at about 6.30 a.m., wh...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Abhishek Krishna Vs. Medical Council of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
1. This application is filed by respondent no.3-State of Karnataka to recall the interim order dated 30.05.2017 passed in these petitions to the extent it also directed admission of vacant seats through the Common Counselling Authority provided under Regulation 9A of the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 ('the Regulations'). 2. We have heard Sri Madhusudhan R.Naik, learned Advocate General for respondent no.3-State of Karnataka, Sri Sridhar Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri N.Khetty, learned counsel for respondent no.1-Medical Council of India and Sri K.Shashi Kiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel for the applicants in I.A.Nos.4 and 5/2017. 3. The learned Advocate General, by referring to several decisions and orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, submitted that the interim order dated 30.05.2017 passed in these petitions to the extent it directed admission of vacant seats through the Common Counselling Authority provided under Regulation 9A of the Regulatio...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Ltd Vs. C Mallikarjuna S/O Nagareddy
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR MFA NO.2329/2009 (WC) BETWEEN THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD LIMITED, BELLARY DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THEIR DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY, AT REGIONAL OFFICE, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-27 (BY SMT. ARUNA R. DESHPANDE, ADV.) ... APPELLANT AND1 C MALLIKARJUNA S/O NAGAREDDY AGE:27. YEARS, R/O: VINAYAKA NAGAR, BELLARY.2. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O GOPALAPPA MAJOR, VINAYAKA NAGAR CONTONMENT, BELLARY (BY SRI. Y. LAKSHMIKANT REDDY, ADV.) ... RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION301) OF THE WORKMENS COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 AGAINST :2. : THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED2912.2008 PASSED IN WCA NO.46/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMENS COMPENSATION, SUB DIVISION II, BELLARY, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.51,667/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF12 P.A. FROM THE DATE OF ORDER TILL ITS DEPOSIT. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR HEARING, TH...
Tag this Judgment!Neelkantharaya Vs. The State of Karnataka, Through: Shahapur Police St ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for appellant praying to call for the records and set aside the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated: 24-06-2011 of the Court of District and Sessions Judge at Yadgiri in Special Case No.69/2010. Convicting the appellants / accused for the offences p/u/s 504, 332 of IPC and U/s 3(1) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) This appeal having been heard on 13-06-2017, reserved for judgment and coming on for pronouncement of judgment this day, the Court delivered the following:-) 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the accused/appellant being aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction passed in Special Case No.69/2010 by District and Sessions Judge Yadgir by its Judgment and order dated: 24-06-2011. 2. The brief matrix of the case of the complainant are that, complainant is working as village accountant of Balkal village. On 09-12-2009 during morning hours, he went to the office of Ta...
Tag this Judgment!Mashaqsab Holkundi and Others Vs. The State, Through University Police ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to issue directions to the University police to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.190/2017 of University Police Station, Kalaburagi.) 1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.190/2017 of University Police Station, Kalaburagi, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 354, 307, 336, 504, 506 r/w Section 149 of IPC and Under Section 3(I)(X) of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. (For short 'SC/ST Act') 2. Brief facts leading to filing of the complaint are that, on 5.6.2017 at about 8:30 PM when the petitioner Nos.3 and 6 had picked up quarrel with the cousin of the complainant near Badiger Katti, the complainant had pacified the quarrel. On the same day at about 10:00 PM when the complainant was speakin...
Tag this Judgment!G.C. Santhosh Kumar Vs. The General Manager Cum Owner of K.S.R.T.C Bus ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award Dated 31.07.2015 passed in MVC No.933/2012 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Mandya, dismissing the Claim Petition for Compensation.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed in MVC No.933/2012 dated 31/07/2015 by the learned II Addl.Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Mandya. The appellant is the petitioner/claimant before the Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.9 lacs together with interest at 18% p.a., from the date of petition till realization and the said claim petition came to be dismissed. 2. To avoid overlappings and confusions, the parties are hereafter referred with reference to their status before the Tribunal. 3. It is stated that on 11.04.2012 at about 12.15 pm., at Mandya - K.M.Doddi road, Soonagahalli, near the land of Devaiah, the petitioner was returning after attending the nature call to step into the autorickshaw....
Tag this Judgment!Jayanthi R Acharya Vs. Shankar Poojary and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act against the Judgment and Award Dated:13.04.2016 passed in MVC No.629/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Member Additional MACT, Kundapura, partly allowing the Claim Petition for Compensation and seeking enhancement of Compensation. This MFA having been Heard and Reserved on 07.04.2017 and coming on for pronouncement of Judgment this day, the Court delivered the following.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed in MVC No.629/2014 dated 13.04.2016 by the learned Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Kundapura. 2. In order to avoid overlappings and confusions, the parties are hereafter referred with reference to their status before the Tribunal. 3. A road accident occurred on 17.05.2014 at 3.45 p.m., where the petitioner as a pedestrian, was standing at divider on the western side of NH-66 which is close to Shri Chempi Venkataramana Temple, Moodahadu Village, Udupi Taluk. By that...
Tag this Judgment!The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubballi and Another Vs. The Totag ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 260a of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 praying to: I. Formulate the Substantial Questions of Law Stated Above. II. Allow the appeal and set aside the Orders Passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench 'C' in ITA No.706/Bang/2015 Dtd: 22.01.2016 and confirm the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 Sirsi, in the Interest of Justice and Equity.) Mr.Y.V.Raviraj, Adv. for Revenue. Mr. A Shankar, Mr.M. Lava and Mr.S. S. Hegde Advs. for assessee. 1. The aforesaid five Income Tax Appeals are filed by the Revenue while another set of five appeals have been filed by the assessee and all the ten appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The substantial questions of law involved in the present appeals filed by the Revenue are as follows: (I) "Whether the assessee, Totagar Co-operative Sale Society, Sirsi, is entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') in respect...
Tag this Judgment!The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs. The Totagars Co-Operative Sale ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
1/57 Date of Judgment:16. 06.2017 ITA No.100066/2016 & Connected cases The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, C R Building, Navanagar, Hubballi. & Anr. Vs. The Totagars Co-Operative Sale Society, Sirsi. R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE16h DAY OF JUNE2017PRESENT THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE H. B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY INCOME TAX APPEAL No.100066 of 2016 Connected with INCOME TAX APPEAL Nos.100064, 100065, 100067, 100068 & 100051-100054 of 2016 IN ITA No.100066/2016: BETWEEN:1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C R BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI.2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SIRSI, AACAT0251D. (By Sri. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.) AND: APPELLANTS257 Date of Judgment:16. 06.2017 ITA No.100066/2016 & Connected cases The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, C R Building, Navanagar, Hubballi. & Anr. Vs. The Totagars Co-Operative Sale Society, Sirsi. THE TOTAGARS CO-OPERATIVE SALE SOCIETY, TSS ROAD, NEW MARKET YARD, SIRSI. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri....
Tag this Judgment!Siddaraju Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
1 - - WP No.22904/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF JUNE2017PRESENT R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA WRIT PETITION NO.22904/2017 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: ...PETITIONER SIDDARAJU, S/O LATE DASAIAH AGED ABOUT59YEARS COMMANDANT, KARNATAKA ARMED RESERVE POLICE MOUNTED COMPANY LALITH MAHAL ROAD MYSURU 570 010 RESIDING AT NO.375, 1ST CROSS GAYATHRIPURAM2D STAGE OPPOSITE PF OFICE MYSURU 570 019 (BY SRI H.V.NAGARAJA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2.3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE MYSURU CITY MYSURU 570 001 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL & INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001 2 - - WP No.22904/2017 PRAVEEN ALVA, MAJOR IN AGE ASSISTANT COMMANDANT STATE INTELLIGENCE BENGALURU 560 001 4. (BY MS.M.S.PRATHIMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »