Karnataka Court June 2017 Judgments
Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-27-2017
Dated 27th June, 2017 W.P.No.10335/2017 (Excise) Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of 1/12 Karnataka and Others. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.10335/2017 (EXCISE) BETWEEN LAKSHMI BAR & RESTAURANT, #866/951/33 SHOP NO.3, GROUND FLOOR, UTTARAHALLI, KENGERI MAIN ROAD, CHANNASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 061. REP. BY ITS OWNER, SMT. T. N. VARALAKSHMI. (BY SRI. K. G. NAYAK, ADVOCATE) AND1 PETITIONER THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, VOKKALIGARA BHAVANA, RANICHENNAMMA CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 001.2.3. Dated 27th June, 2017 W.P.No.10335/2017 (Excise) Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others. 2/12 4. THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, WEST RANGE, BENGALURU - 560 022. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. M. SU...
Tag this Judgment!Sharanappa Vs. The State of Karnataka, Through Farhatabad Police Stati ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-23-2017
(Prayer: This writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India R/w Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to issue writ of certiorari or any writ or direction by quashing the order dated 05.08.2016 in Crl. Rev. Petition No.90/2016 passed by Learned Prl. Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi and also order passed by Learned II Addl. JMFC Judge at Kalaburagi dated 06.06.2016 on the application filed U/S 457 of Cr.P.C in Crime No.164/2015 pending in C.C.No.1506/2016 of Farhatabad P.S vide Annexures-C and D to this petition and etc.) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner- owner of Tata Tipper bearing Reg.No.MH-04/DD-[Corrected vide Court order dated : 31/07/2017]0883, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ by quashing the order dated 05.08.2016 passed by the learned Prl. Sessions Judge, Kalabuargi in Crl.Rev.Pet.No.90/2016 and also the order dated 06.06.2016 passed in Crime No.164/15 by the learned II Addl. JMFC Judge, Kalaburagi, reject...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Krishna Shelters, Rept. By its Chairman and Managing Director K.A. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2017
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash Annexure-F the termination order/notice dated 30.12.2015 issued by the R2 and direct the respondent No.2 to consider the reply dated 19.12.2015 vide Annexure-E in W.P.No.316/2016, to quash the order at Annexure-G, dated 30.12.2015 in W.P.No.314/2016, and etc. These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to consider Annexure-P for rescheduling of the works in W.P.No.20140/2016 and direct the respondents to consider Annexure-M for rescheduling of the works in W.P.No.21883/2016 and etc.) 1. The petitioner's grievance is over the termination of the contracts awarded to it by the respondents. The tenders floated are for the construction of sports complex, apartments for faculty and non-faculty members and multistoried boys' hostel on the campus of National Institute of Technology, Surathkal. The facts are...
Tag this Judgment!S. Vikram and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its SPP
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.227/2017 of Mahadevapura P.S, Bengaluru City, which is registered for the offence P/U/S.3(1)(X) of SC/ST (Poa) Act, 1989 and Sec. 323, 504, 506 r/w.34 of IPC.) 1. The petitioners in both petitions apprehend their arrest by the respondent/police in Crime No.227/2017 of Mahadevapura Police station registered under Sections 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for brevity 'the Act' hereinafter). 2. The petitioner in Criminal Misc.4255/2017 (Criminal Petition No.4831/2017) is a practicing advocate, representing the co-accused in a civil case pending between the mother-in-law of the Accused Nos.2 and 3 and the employer of the complainant. 3. The allegation of the complainant is, he is a Security Guard by profession working for M/s.Akruti Developers Developers. He knows ...
Tag this Judgment!Navesh Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented by State Public Prosecu ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-23-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying to allow the bail petition and release the petitioner on bail by taking required surety in Cr.No.159/2016 of Mudhol P.S., registered for the offences punishable under sections 366(A), 376(2) (N) of Indian Penal Code R/w Section 5 and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, pending trial before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi under Spl.C.No.11/2017.) 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in Crime No.159/2016 of Mudhol Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Section 366(A), 376 (2) (N) of IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. Brief facts leading to filing of the complaint are that, the complainant being the mother of the victim filed the complaint alleging that on 2.11.2016 at about 8:00 AM, her daughter went to the college by telling that she will come in the evening hou...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. Venkatappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF JUNE2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.526/2017 BETWEEN:1. SRI VENKATAPPA SON OF VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT35YEARS RESIDING AT: DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.2. 3.4. SRI NARAYANASWAMY SON OF VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT38YEARS RESIDING AT: DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. SRI VENKATESHA SON OF GURUMURTHY AGED ABOUT37YEARS RESIDING AT: DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. SRI NARAYANASWAMY SON OF KATHE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT36YEARS RESIDING AT: DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.-. 2 - 5. SRI MUNIRAJU SON OF MUNISWAMAPPA AGEDA BOUT40YEARS RESIDING AT: DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. PETITIONERS (BY SRI TOMY SEBASTIAN, SR. ADV. FOR SRI RENY SEBASTIAN...
Tag this Judgment!Government of Karnataka Vs. Ngef Limited (In Liquidation)
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
1/48 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI COMPANY APPLICATION NO.184/2015 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.154/2002 Between: Government of Karnataka Secretariat, Vidhan Soudha Bengaluru-560001 Represented by Karnataka State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (KSIIDC) Khanija Bhavan 49, 4th Floor, East Wing Race Course Road, Bengaluru-560 001. (By Mr. K.G. Raghavan, Senior Counsel for Mr. Saji P. John and Smt. B. Rajashree, Advocates) And: NGEF Limited (in liquidation) Represented by the Official Liquidator Attached to the High Court of Karnataka Corporate Bhavan, No.26-27, 12th Floor Raheja Towers, M.G. Road, Bengaluru-560 001. (By Ms. Revathy Adinath Narde, Advocate for Official Liquidator Mr. R.V.S. Naik, for King & Partridge, Advocate for German Company - EHG) ... Respondent ... Applicant Date of Order 22-06-2017 C.A..No.184/2015 in Co.P.No.154/2002 Government of Karnataka Vs. NGEF Limi...
Tag this Judgment!R. Renukambike and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
(Prayer: This I.A.No.XI of 2017 IS filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 R/W Rule 39 of the Karnataka High Court Writ Proceedings Rules, the proposed Respondent Nos.7, 8, 12,14, 18, 21, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 49, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 74, 75, 78, 79, 84, 87, 90, 92, 93, 94, 99, 168, 169, 180, 181, 194, 195, 196, 199, 201, 203, 211, 217, 225, 230, 248, 266, 267, 274, 275, 278, 279, 283, 284, 289, 290, 306, 307, 308, 309, 335, 336, 337, 340, 343, 353, 358 and 361 praying to vacate the Order Dated April 05, 2017 directing the authorities not to give appointment in terms of the Order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, in the Interest of Justice and equity. This I.A.No.XI of 2017 in Writ Petitions No.13617-13627 of 2017 and Writ Petition No.14529 of 2017 having been heard and reserved for orders on June 13, 2017, coming on for pronouncement of Order, this day, P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J., pronounced the fol...
Tag this Judgment!The Deputy Conservator Vs. Sri v B Venkatesha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF JUNE2017BEFORE R THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NO.20290/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, BHADRA WILD LIFE DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALURU.2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALURU.3. THE PRL. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, WILD LIFE WING ARANYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU.4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VASANTH V FERNANDES, HCGP) 2 AND:1. SRI V B VENKATESHA S/O BADIYAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O VADDIHATTI, MODLA VILLAGE, CHIKKAMAGALUR TALUK, NOW R/O KOPPA TOWN, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 126.2. SRI.DEVARAJ S/O PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, NOW R/O BIDARE VILLAGE, KHANDYA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 126. ***** ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.20.2.20...
Tag this Judgment!Renukumbike R Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA R AT BENGALURU Dated this the 21st day of June, 2017 PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P S DINESH KUMAR I.A.No.XI of 2017 in Writ Petitions No.13617-13627 and 14529 of 2017 [(S-RES)PIL]. BETWEEN: SMT.RENUKAMBIKE R AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS (BY SHRI.RAHAMATHULLA KOTHWAL) RESPONDENTS AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS (BY SHRI.B.V.ACHARYA, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG WITH SHRI.B.L.ACHARYA, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANTS/AND ALSO FOR APPLICANTS IN I.A.XI OF2017 2 THIS I.A.NO.XI OF2017IS FILED UNDER SECTION151OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 R/W RULE39OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT WRIT PROCEEDINGS RULES, THE PROPOSED RESPONDENT NOs.7, 8, 12,14, 18, 21, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 49, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 74, 75, 78, 79, 84, 87, 90, 92, 93, 94, 99, 168, 169, 180, 181, 194, 195, 196, 199, 201, 203, 211, 217, 225, 230, 248, 266, 267, 274, 275, 278, 279, 2...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »