Karnataka Court March 2017 Judgments
Kalappa Since Deceased By His LRs and Others Vs. Nagamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
(Prayer: This Petition is Filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, Praying To Review The Order Dated: 17/11/2004 Passed In W.P.No.7988/2002.) 1. The relief sought in the review petition as also the applications filed in the writ petition is ultimately with the object of avoiding the order dated 17.11.2004 passed in W.P.No.7988/2002 (SC/ST). Hence, this petition along with the applications are taken up, considered and disposed of by this common order. 2. Keeping in view that the long delay of more than 3300 days is sought for condonation both in filing the review petition as also in filing the application for recalling the order dated 17.11.2004 in the writ petition and the reason assigned seeking condonation of delay would relate to the consideration of the grounds urged for review as also recall, the contentions on merits are also taken note so as to consider the sustainability of the petition itself. 3. Since the array of parties is different in the review petition as against what is indi...
Tag this Judgment!Nagaraj and Another Vs. State By P.S. Rampura, Represented by the Stat ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
(Prayer: This Crl.P is filed u/s.482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the FIR in Cr.No.117/2014 of Srirampura P.S., pending on the file of the VII A.C.M.M., Bangalore.) 1. This petition is filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the F.I.R. in Cr.No.117/2014 of Srirampura Police Station pending on the file of VII A.C.M.M., Bengaluru. 2. The respondent Police registered the above F.I.R. on 8.4.2014 on the basis of the complaint lodged by Sri.B.L.Janardhan - the Police Officer of Srirampura Police Station. In the complaint it is alleged that the petitioners herein (accused No.1 and 2) had contested from Ward Nos.95 and 96 on independent seats and had won the elections and were elected as Corporators. Later, petitioner No.1 had contested the M.L.A. election and lost the same. According to the complainant, petitioners herein had political grudge against Congress Party leaders and therefore, they were habituated in accusing rival political party members for every incident that took place ...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Menon and Others Vs. Ramesh Chelliah and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed u/s.482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the proceedings initiated against the Petitioners under PCR.No.44/2016 on the file of II Addl. City Civil and S.J., Bangalore Vide Annexure-A.) 1. This petition is filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners in PCR.No.44/2016 pending on the file of the II Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. 2. In the petition it is stated that petitioner No.1 is the Vice President of the Ensemble Engineering Department in a Company named Adva IT solutions Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "The Company"). He is the senior most employee of the Company. In terms of salary, he is the highly paid employee of the Company. Petitioner No.2 is the Senior Manager, Engineering Department. Petitioner No.3 is the Director of the Site Operations Department of the same Company. 3. It is further averred that respondent No.1 currently earns a pay of Rs.62,08,119/- p.a. The ...
Tag this Judgment!K Satish Nayak Vs. The Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.Nos.10940 10964/2017 c/w W.P.No.7540/2017 (MV) IN W.P.Nos.10940-10964/2017 (MV) BETWEEN: K.SATISH NAYAK S/O DEVARAJAIAH NAYAK AGE44YEARS POORNIMA TRAVELS SADANANDA TOWER OPP. BUS STAND UDUPI DISTRICT-576101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.VIJAYASHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI.M.E.NAGESH, ADV.) AND:1. 2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAJATHADRI, UDUPI-576101. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BENGALURU MANGALURU DIVISION MANGALURU 575004. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR.Y.H, AGA FOR R1 SRI.HAREESH BHANDARY, ADV FOR R2) - 2 - THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECRETARY, ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, UDUPI, DATED1702.2017 VIDE ANNEXURES-D1 TO D25. ETC., IN W.P.No.7540/2017 (MV) BETWEEN: K.SATISH NAYAK S/O DEVARAJAIAH NAYAK AGE44YEARS POORNI...
Tag this Judgment!Kalappa Since Deceased by His Lrs 1(a).krishnappa Vs. Smt Nagamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA REVIEW PETITION No.248/2014 I N WRIT PETITION No.7988/2002 (SC/ST) BETWEEN:1. KALAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS1a). KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, 1(b). NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, 1(c). SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, R/O NANDI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-562101. 1(d). SMT. ANASUYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, R/O YAGADAHALLI TUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK. 1(e). SMT. LALITHAMMA W/O BYREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, R/O GADENAHALLY, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 1(f). SMT. RADAMMA W/O RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT34YEARS, 2 R/O YELUR, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 1(g). RAJANNA S/O LATE KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, 1(h). GOWRAMMA D/O LATE KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, ALL ARE R/O SINGAVARA VILLAGE, DODDASAGARAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALO...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. Ramangouda S/O Sanna Basavan Gouda, Vs. The Commissioner Cum Appe ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15H MARCH, 2017 BEFORE R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NO.101666/2016 (GM-EC) BETWEEN SRI.RAMANGOUDA S/O SANNA BASAVAN GOUDA, AGE:57. YEARS, OCC: NOW NIL, R/O: HIRE HADLIGI VILLAGE, TALUK & DISTRICT: BALLARI. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.M.KALWAD, ADVOCATE) AND1 2.3.4. THE COMMISSIONER CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, NEAR SAHAKAR BHAVAN, BENGALURU. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI. THE TAHASILDAR, BALLARI, TALUK & DISTRICT: BALLARI. M.ANJANEYALAU S/O HANUMANTHAYYA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NOT KNOWN, R/O: COWL BAZAR, BANDIHATTI ROAD, OPP: ANJANEYA TEMPLE, TALUK & DISTRICT: BALLARI. (BY SMT.K.VIDYAVATHI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.SACHIN S. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R4) ... RESPONDENTS2THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED2705.2015, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND CONSEQUENTLY THIS ORDER WAS CONFIRMED BY THE RES...
Tag this Judgment!Chandrashekhar Eligar Vs. State By Lokayuktha Police, Dharwad District ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
K.N. Phaneendra, J. 1. The present petition is filed seeking quashing of the First Information Report in Crime No. 4 of 2015 registered by the respondent-Lokayukta Police, for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) and 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. The brief factual aspects that emanate from the records are that: The petitioner was appointed and working as Assistant Engineer in PWD Department since 1983 and later, on promotion he was posted as Superintendent Engineer on 30-3-2014. It is the case of the prosecution that the Lokayukta Police, Chitradurga has received an information from ADGP, Lokayukta, Bangalore, that some people are transporting huge amount in a Innova Car bearing Registration No. KA-01/G-4572 from Dharwad to Bengaluru and in fact, he requested the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukta, Chitradurga District to take appropriate action in this regard. On the basis of such information, the Superintende...
Tag this Judgment!Shantesh Gureddi and Others Vs. The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mah ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ Petition Nos. 31080/2015 and 31202-205/2015 Dated 16/3/2016. These Writ Appeals are filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ Petition No.31078/2015 and 31207-31210/2015 Dated 16/03/2016.) Common Judgment: 1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these appeals, by the consent of the learned advocates for the parties, they are taken up together for hearing. 2. These appeals are filed against a common order passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge allowing a batch of writ petitions filed by the applicants for addition of parties before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal, for brevity) and directing their addition in the appeals before the Tribunal. 3. The litigation has a chequered history. Adjacent owners residing in Cunningham Cross Road, Bengaluru, are figh...
Tag this Judgment!Kannada Balaga Society's Rural Ayurveda Medical College, Hospital and ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
Vineet Kothari, J. 1. Heard the learned Counsels. 2. The petitioner-Kannada Balaga Society's Rural Ayurveda Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, has tiled these writ petitions, aggrieved by the impugned order Annexure-H, dated 24th December, 2016 passed by the respondent 3-Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science, Bengaluru (for short 'RGUHS'), disaffiliating the petitioner's Ayurvedic Medical College from the respondent 3-RGUHS for the academic year 2016-17, while directing that the students who were admitted by the petitioner's College for the previous academic sessions up to 2015-16, should be immediately informed to contact the respondent 3-RGUHS for their transfer to some other colleges affiliated to RGUHS having vacant seats so as to safeguard their interests. 3. The respondent 3-RGUHS had initiated the disaffiliation process to disaffiliate the petitioner's College from the academic year 2015-16 itself, as according to the respondent 3-RGUHS, the petitioner's Ayurvedi...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Company Limited, Represented by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in Writ Petition No.41854/2016 dated 9.11.2016.) 1. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr.M.R.Rajagopal, learned advocate, accepts notice for the respondent No.1. Mr.V.Sreenidhi, learned additional government advocate, accepts notice for the respondent No.2. Mr.Mayanna B.L., learned advocate, appears for Mr.T.S.Amar Kumar, learned advocate and accepts notice for the respondent No.3. He submits that Mr.T.S.Amar Kumar, learned advocate shall be filing vakalathnama for the respondent No.3. Therefore, the appeals become ready as regards service by appearance. 2. By consent of the learned advocates appearing for the parties, the appeals are taken up for final hearing. 3. These are appeals challenging the interim order dated November 9, 2016, passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in Writ Petition No.41854 of 2016. 4. We find substance in the argument of Mr.S.S.Naganand, learned senio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »