Karnataka Court February 2017 Judgments
Francis Lobo Vs. Mary Lobo and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
(Prayer: This RFA filed under Sec.96 and Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 against the Order Dated 30.07.2015 passed in F.D.P.No.3/2014 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, D.K.,(C/c) allowing the petition filed U/O XX Rule 18 and Sec.151 CPC.) 1. This appeal is filed under Section 96 of CPC challenging the order dated 30.07.2015 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada in F.D.P.No.3/2014. An order is also sought from this Court to set aside the report submitted by the Court Commissioner effecting division of the property pursuant to the preliminary decree passed. 2. Grievance of appellant who is respondent in the Court below is that the Court Commissioner has not taken note of all the aspects of the matter involving the suit schedule property and has committed error in showing the allotment of Yellow coloured portion of the premises measuring 12 cents comprised in Sy.No.30/1B P2 of Kankanady Village, Mangalore Taluk in favou...
Tag this Judgment!The Bangalore Development Vs. Sri Bhagavandas Patel
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR R.F.A. NO.2373/2007 BETWEEN: THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HEAD OFFICE SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK (WEST) BANGALORE-560020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER (BY SRI.K.N.PUTTE GOWDA-ADV) AND: SRI. BHAGAVANDAS PATEL S/O SRI. BHIMJI PATEL AGED MAJOR, R/A JOGUMAYA SAW MILL OLD MADRAS ROAD, VIJINAPURA, DOORAVANINAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560016 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI. JAGADISH SINGH (BY SRI. PADMANABHA MAHALE - SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. H.DEVENDRAPPA-ADV) APPELLANT RESPONDENT THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS96R/W ORDER XLIII RULE1OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:20. 6.2007 PASSED IN OS NO.2844/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE XVL ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-12), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. I.A.2/2007 FILED BY THE APPELLANT UNDER ORDER XLI RULE27R/W SECTION151OF CPC, PRAYING TO PERMIT HIM TO PRODUCE ADDITIONAL DOCUM...
Tag this Judgment!K. L. Vidyashankar Vs. Guruprasad G C
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR MFA.NO.5841/2016 (MV) ... APPELLANT BETWEEN: K.L.VIDYASHANKAR S/O SRI K.L.NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT55YEARS, R/AT No.12 (U-37) 1ST FLOOR, 14TH CROSS, SWIMMINGPOOL EXTENSION, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE 560 003. (BY SRI.K.L.VIDYA SHANKAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND:1. GURUPRASAD.G.C S/O CHANDRASEKHARAIAH.G AGED ABOUT26YEARS, R/O No.8/1, 11TH MAIN, SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010.2. G.CHANDRASEKHARAIAH S/O G.SIDDAIAH, R/O No.8/1, 11TH MAIN, SHIVANAGAR, 2 RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010.3. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER, GOLDEN HEIGHTS, 4TH FLOOR, No.1/2, 59TH C CROSS, 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010. (BY SRI.A.N.KRISHNA SWAMY, ADV. FOR R3) ... RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:14. 07.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.5117/15 ON THE FILE OF THE10H ADDITIONAL ...
Tag this Judgment!Intelligence Officer Vs. P Balakrishnan @ Krishna @ Balan @ Rajan
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF FEBRUARY2017BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2009BETWEEN: Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, South Zonal Unit, Chennai. (By Shri K.N. Mohan, Special Public Prosecutor) AND:1. P. Balakrishnan @ Krishna @ APPELLANT. Balan @ Rajan, S/o. Periaswamy Maria Pillai, Aged about 35 years, No.30, Temple Street, Medavakkam Colony, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.2. T. Soloman, 2 S/o. T.S. Thomas, Aged about 50 years, No.41-B, North Badrakaliamman Koil Street, Tuticorin.3. S. Raj, S/o. Shanmugavel, Aged about 43 years, No.3/30, Shivarajapuram, Tuticorin-1.4. Sam Sundar Singh, S/o. Durairaj, Aged about 46 years, No.83, Vadakku Badrakali Amman Koil Street, Tuticorin-1.5. R. Muniswamy @ Swamy, S/o. S. Ramaswamy, Aged about 45 years, No.57, Krishnappa Agraharam Street, Kondithoppe, Chennai-79.6. K. Sudalaiandi, S/o. Kandaswamy, Aged about 40 years, 12th Prine Nagar, Tuticorin Post, Tamil Na...
Tag this Judgment!shri.jayanth Vs. Deputy Commissioner,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 27th Day of February 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA Criminal Revision Petition No.100220/2016 - Petitioner Between: Shri Jayanth, S/o Goida @ Govinda Naik, S/o Goida @ Govinda Naik, Age 36 yrs, Occupation, Gram Panchayat Member & Auto Driver, R/a, Sonarkeri, Mavali-1, Murdeshwar, Bhatkal Taluk, Dist: Uttar Kannada. (By Sri Gourishankar H. Mot, Advocate) And:1. 2.3. Deputy Commissioner / District Magistrate, U.K. District, Karwar, rep. by S.P.P. High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. Superintendent of Police, U.K. Karwar, rep. by State Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Dharwar. Circle Police Inspector, Bhatkal Circle, Bhatkal, 2 4.5. Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Dharwar. Police Sub Inspector, Murdeshwar Police Station, Murdeshwar Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Dharwar. Additional Superintendent of Police, Bhatkal, (UK) rep. by State Public Prosecutor, ...
Tag this Judgment!S.C. Jayachandra Vs. Enforcement Directorate, Rep. by Special Public P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2017
(Prayer: This Crl.P is filed u/s.439 Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the Petr. on bail in ECIR/BGZO/13/2016 pending on the file of XXXII Addl. City Civil and S.J., and Spl. Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore and Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering, for the offences P/U/Ss.3, 4 and 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The XXXII Addl. City Civil and S.J. and Spl. Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore and Special Court under the Prevention of Money laundering act has rejected the Bail Application on 7.1.2017 in ECIR/BGZO/13/2016.) 1. This petition is filed seeking bail in Case No. ECIR/BGZO/13/2016 registered by the respondent, Enforcement Directorate, Bengaluru Zone ('ED' for short) against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 8 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 ('PML Act' for short). 2. Heard Shri C.V.Nagesh, learned Senior Counsel for Shri Sandeep Patil, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri S. Mahesh, learned standing Counsel ...
Tag this Judgment!Jayachandra Vs. Anti-Corruption Bureau, Rep. by its Special Public Pro ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2017
(Prayer: This Crl.P is filed u/s.439 Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the Petr. on bail in Cr.NO.25/2016 of Anti-Corruption Bureau, Bangalore City P.S, Bangalore for the offences P/U/Ss.13(1)(e), 13(1)(d), 13(2) of P.C Act. The XXIII Addl. City Civil and S.J., Spl. Judge, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore has rejected the Bail Application on 12.01.2017 in Cr.No.25/2016.) 1. This petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C, is filed by the petitioner for grant of bail in Crime No.25/2016 registered by the respondent / Anti - Corruption Bureau ('ACB' for short) for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(e), 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('PC Act' for short). 2. Heard Shri C.V.Nagesh, learned Senior Counsel for Shri Sandeep Patil, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Jagadeesh B.N, learned Spl. PP for the respondent - ACB. 3. The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner has acquired disproportionate assets to his known source of income in the check period betw...
Tag this Judgment!H.D. Praveen Kumar and Others Vs. Vice Chancellor, Visvesvaraya Techno ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2017
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed by the Learned Single Judge made in WP 1822-28/16, but referring to WP 1828/16 and WP 3315-35/16, but referring to WP 3318/16, WP 3322/16, WP 3327/16, WP 3328/16 [Education] Dated 24/3/16, by allowing the Writ Appeals filed by the Appellants and to grant the relief as prayed by them in their Respective Writ Petitions, to secure the ends of Justice and Equity.) 1. We have perused the office objections. 2. After hearing Mr.S.R.Hegde Hudlamane, learned advocate appearing for the appellants, the office objections are overruled. 3. The application for condonation of delay is taken up for hearing. The delay is of 198 days. 4. Mr.Santosh S. Nagarale, learned advocate, appears for the Visvesvaraya Technological University. 5. After hearing Mr.S.R.Hegde Hudlamane, learned advocate appearing in support of the application for condonation of delay, Mr. Santosh S. Nagarale, learned advo...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Karnataka Aromas, Rep. herein by its Power of Attorney Holder, Vi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2017
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to Quash Tender Dated 12.10.2016 issued by the Respondent at Annex-A and direct Respondent to comply with the Terms of Tender Dated 11.03.2016 vide Annex-B and direct the Respondent to purchase the remaining Quantity of 1,300 kgs of Vetivert Oil from the petitioner at the Tendered Rate.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking that the Tender Notification No.KSDL/2016-17/IND2765 dated 12.10.2016 issued by the respondent for procurement of Vetivert oil be quashed. In consequence the petitioner is seeking that the respondent be directed to comply with the terms of the earlier tender dated 11.03.2016 and purchase the remaining quantity of 1300 kgs of Vetivert oil from the petitioner. 2. The respondent had issued the tender notification dated 11.03.2016 calling for bid to supply 4800 kgs of Vetivert oil which is used for the soaps manufactured by the respondent. The petitioner's bi...
Tag this Judgment!Flipkart India Private Limited Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF FEBRUARY2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN Writ Petition Nos.1339-1342/2017 (T-IT) Petitioner Between : Flipkart India Private Limited A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and validly existing under the Companies Act, 2013 Having its office at: Vaishnavi Summit, No.6/B, 7th Main, 80 Feet Road, 3rd Block, Koramangala Industrial Layout, Bengaluru-560034, Through its duly authorized signatory Mr. R. Rama Chandra. (By Sri K. G. Raghavan, Senior Counsel for Sri Arun Sri Kumar, Advocate) And :1. 2. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 3(1) (1), BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560095. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3 BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560095. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3 BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560095. Respondents 2 (By Sri K. V. Aravind, Advocate) These Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »