Karnataka Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jyothishree Vs. R. Chidananda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of Family Court Act against the Judgment and Decree Dated 5.12.2013 passed in M.C.NO.1076/2010 on the file of the 5th Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore allowing the petition filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act.) 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2013 passed by the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru in MC No.1076/2010, the appellant/wife has preferred the above appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act. By the impugned judgment and decree the Trial Court has allowed the petition of the respondent-husband for divorce. 2. The respondent filed M.C.No.1076/2010 against the appellant for divorce. For the purpose of convenience, the parties will be referred to hereafter with their ranks before the trial Court. In the petition, the petitioner/husband alleged that the respondent has deserted him since 01.04.2005 and subjected him to cruelty imputing him the communicab...
Sri Jayaramu Vs. The Registrar General
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NOS.63901-63903/2016 (S-RES) SRI JAYARAMU AGED ABOUT38YEARS S/O SRI BACHAIAH R/AT HUNUGANAHALLY COLONY MUTHEGERE POST BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA-571 416 (REGN. NO.BLR1600496) SMT. SHOBHA AGED ABOUT38YEARS W/O SRI. BABANNA R/AT NO.215, ASHIRVADA NILAYA C BLOCK, 9TH CROSS4H MAIN, GOPALA GOWDA EXTENSION SHIVAMOGGA-577 205 BETWEEN:1. 2.3. (REGN.NO.BLR160053) SMT. MEENAKSHI AGED ABOUT34YEARS W/O DR. MAHESH R/AT #41, 1ST CROSS1T C MAIN, BEHIND HARAVIJAYA APARTMENT2MANJUNATHA NAGAR ITTAMADU, BSK3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085 (REGN. NO.BLR1600520) (BY SRI.G.R.MOHAN, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONERS AND: THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA) ... RESPONDENT THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REVIEW THE SELECTION PROCESS AND CONSIDER THE CASES OF...
Rame Gowda Vs. H.C Girish and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed u/s 173(1) of MV act against the judgment and award dated:8.10.2010 passed in MVC no.8429/2008 on the file of x additional Judge, Court of small causes, member, Mact, Bangalore, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and award dated 3th October 2010 made in MVC No.8429/2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal" for short). 2. The owner of the TATA Sumo vehicle being aggrieved by the judgment and award fastening the liability on him to compensate the claimant has filed MFA No. 1459/2011 whereas the claimant being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation filed MFA No.4002/2011. Hence both the appeals are clubbed together and disposed of by this common judgment. 3. For the convenience and better understanding, the parties are referred to as arrayed before the Tribunal. 4. The claimant f...
The Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Vs. C. Sun ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed u/s 173(1) of MV act against the judgment and award dated: 07.02.2011 passed in MVC No.9503/2009 on the file of the XVI additional Judge, Mact, Bangalore, awarding a compensation of Rs. 3,43,400/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.) 1. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance company filed this appeal challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and award dated 7th February 2011 made in MVC No.9503/2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal' for short) fastening liability on them to compensate the claimant. 2. The first respondent herein filed a claim petition contending that on 01-11-2009 at about 2.40 p.m., while he was proceeding on the footpath new BEML Railway Station of Bangarpet-KGF Road, a Hero Honda Unicorn motor cycle bearing Registration No.KA-02/EP-9495 ridden by its rider in a rash and negligent manner came from KGF side and dashed against the clai...
The Management of M/s. Gem Properties Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Dir ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Impugned Order passed by the Additional Labour Commissioner Dated 11.03.2014, at Annexure-B to this WP thereby restoring the age of Retirement to 55 years extendable up to 58 years as opposed to 58 years unconditionally that has been imposed upon the Impugned Order passed by the Respondent Appellant Authority under Industrial Employment [Standing Orders] Act 1946.) 1. The petitioner Company has presented the above writ petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order passed by the Addl. Labour Commissioner, Bengaluru, made in No.SOA/CR-8/ 2012-13 dated 11th March 2014 restoring the retirement age from 55 years extended upto 58 years, as per Annexure-B. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that it is a small scale unit manufacturing polyurethane (POP) cement bags and has employed about 103 employees. The customers of the company are cement manufacturers. Petition...
Jitender Prasad Kaushik and Others Vs. State by CBI/ACU.III, Through C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.103/1997 dated 15.12.2009 - convicting the appellant/accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 409, 201, 467, 471, 477(A) of IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(c) and (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (corresponding to Section 5(3) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947) and etc;) 1. These appeals are heard and decided together. 2. The accused are in appeal challenging their conviction. It was alleged that during the period 1988-89, the following officers of the Customs Department, namely, (Accused no.1) J.P. Kaushik, Collector of Customs, Bangalore, (Accused no.2) R.J. Manohar, Additional Collector of Customs, Mangalore and (Accused no.3) G....
Royal Sundaram Aliance Vs. Mr Dorairaj Pillay
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF JANUARY2017PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8384 OF2012CONNECTED WITH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8039 OF2015IN MFA No.8384/2012 BETWEEN: Royal Sundaram Aliance Insurance Company Limited, No.45 and 46, Whites Road, Sundarm Towers, Chennai 600 014 By its Manager. APPELLANT (By Shri O. Mahesh, Advocate) 2 Smt. Shantha Dorairaj Pillay, Aged about 48 years, Wife of Dorairaj Pillay, Aged about 23 years, Son of Dorairaj Pillay, Aged about 53 years, Son of Late Balaram Pillay, Kum. Asha Dorairaj Pillay, Aged about 29 years, Daughter of Dorairaj Pillay, AND:1. Mr. Dorairaj Pillay, 2.3.4. Mr. Anand Dorairaj Pillay, 5. All are residing at A-202, Shri Krishnadhama, Chanakya Chowk, Viratnagar, Virar West, Thane District, Mumbai, Maharashtra. Sri. P. Mustafa, Aged 40 years, Son of Mammu, Resident of New Thoufeeq Manzil, Asad Beach Road,...
Smt Srivalli Bhogaraju Vs. Smt Mamatha Manjunath
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF JANUARY2017PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.10086 OF2013CONNECTED WITH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.10401 OF2013IN MFA No.10086/2013 Smt. Srivalli Bhogaraju, Wife of Kasi Viswanath Bhogaraju, Aged about 49 years, BETWEEN:1. 2. Sri. Kasi Viswanath Bhogaraju, Son of Late B.L.N.Rao, Aged about 56 years, Both are resident of No.S-110, Trinethra Retreat, 2 APPELLANTS Pipeline Road, Yeshwanthapura, Bangalore 560 022. Smt. Mamatha Manjunath, Wife of Sri. Manjunath K.S., Residing at No.2464, E-block, 3rd Main, Mahika, Sahakara Nagar, Bangalore 560 092. (By Shri Gurudeva Prasad K.T., Advocate) AND:1. 2. The Future General India Insurance Company Limited, No.18/1, old No.125/A, 3rd Floor, Ashoka Pillar Road, 1st Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore 560 011. RESPONDENTS (By Shri N. Devaraj, Advocate for Respondent No.1; Shri O. Mahesh, Advoca...
Jitender Prasad Kaushik Vs. State by cbi/acu.iii
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF JANUARY2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.985 OF2009CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.986 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.988 OF2009IN CRL.A.No.985/2009 BETWEEN: Jitender Prasad Kaushik, Son of Jagadish Prakash Kaushik, Aged about 73 years, Residing at A14/3, SFS Flats, Saket, New Delhi 110 017. (By Shri Kiran S. Javali, Advocate) APPELLANT2AND: State by CBI/ACU.III, New Delhi. Through CBI, Bellary Road, Bangalore. (By Shri P. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate) RESPONDENT ***** This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the Advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, in Spl.C.C.No.103/1997 dated 15.12.2009 Bangalore convicting the appellant/accused No.1 the offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 409, ...
M.J. Raghavendra Vs. R. Rajashekhar and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-02-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed u/s 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award Dated: 13.07.2010 passed in MVC No. 4657/2009 on the file of the II Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mact, Bengaluru, Partly allowing the Claim Petition for Compensation and seeking Enhancement of Compensation.) 1. Appellant is the claimant, being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in the judgment and award dated 13-07-2010 made in MVC No.4657/2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal" for short) and also fastening the liability on the owner of the offending vehicle to compensate the claimant, has filed this appeal. 2. The appellant filed a claim petition contending that on 22-02-2009 at about 9.45 p.m., he was proceeding in a auto rickshaw bearing Registration No.KA-09/A-2318 as a passenger from Mysuru Railway Station to the Sub-Urban Bus-stop. When the auto reached near JK Ground traffic signal junction, driver of anot...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »