Karnataka Court January 2017 Judgments
M. Malaiah Vs. The State of Karnataka, Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant/accused praying to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 1.10.2010 passed by the Judge III Additional District and Special Court, Mysore in Spl.C.No.171/2002 - convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and six months and pay a fine of Rs.3,50,000/- in default of payment of fine he shall undergo S.I. for further period of one year - for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act. The appellant/accused prays that he be acquitted.) 1. This appeal is filed in the following background. The appellant was working as Inspector of Excise, Vigilance Squad, Excise Department, Mysore. He is said to have retired fro...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Ramalingappa and Son and Others Vs. R. Jayadev and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/O XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order DT.24.11.2016 passed on I.A.No.1, 2, 4 in O.S.No.776/2015 on the file of the XL Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, dismissing I.A.No.1 and 2 filed U/O 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC and partly allowing I.A.No.4 filed U/O 39 Rules 4 and 7 of CPC and thereby status quo order is vacated.) 1. For the sake of convenience, the ranks of the parties are referred to as per their ranks before the trial Court. 2. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. 3. The suit schedule property is shop Nos.1 and 2 out of property bearing No.49/48-1, 2nd Cross, 2nd Main, APMC Yard, Yeshwanthpur, Bengaluru, with specific measurement. Admittedly, there are two shops. The plaintiffs claim injunction sofar as both the shops are concerned. 4. The defendants have en...
Tag this Judgment!Shivanna, Junior Assistant (Water Meter Reader) Vs. The State by Polic ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
(Prayer: This criminal appeal is filed under 374(2) Cr.P.C praying to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.09.2013 passed by the Spl. Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore City in Spl.C.C.No.62/2008 - convicting the appellant-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.) 1. The judgment and order of conviction dated 30.9.2013 passed by the Special Judge, Bengaluru Urban District, Bengaluru City in Spl.C.C. No.62/2008 is challenged in this appeal by the appellant accused. By the said judgment and order of conviction, the trial Court convicted the appellant accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. Brief facts of the prosecution case as per the complaint averments in Ex.P.6 is that Hameed Khan (P.W.3) lodged a complaint on 11.7.2000 before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, City Div...
Tag this Judgment!State by Lokayuktha Police, Chickmagalur Vs. Dr. M. Hanumantharayappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(1) and (3) code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the State Public Prosecutor for the State praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment dated 21.3.2011 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikmagalur in Spl. Case (Corrupt) No.64/2009 - acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.) 1. This appeal is preferred against the acquittal of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'PC Act', for brevity). 2. It was the case of the prosecution that the respondent herein was working as a Senior Specialist Medical Practitioner at the M.G.Hospital, Chikkamagalur, during the year 2008. On 17-11-2008, one Shruthi, PW-5, was said to have been admitted to the hospital and she was to ...
Tag this Judgment!C. Nagaraju Vs. Mysore City Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus or order directing the 1st respondent to initiate action as per Section.321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 against the 2nd respondent to stop further construction work on the schedule property bearing site No.1482/2, D-111/2, measuring East to West 20 Ft., North to South 46 Ft., situated at Vinoba Road Cross, Bapu Subbarao Rd Galli, Shivarampet, Mysore - 570001 and etc.,) Mr. Vinod Kumar M.N., GPA for petitioner - party-in-person 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of present writ petition with the following prayers:- "(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or other directing the first respondent to initiate action as per Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation act, 1976, against the 2nd respondent to stop further construction work on the schedule property bearing Site No.1482/2, D-111/2, measuring East to West :20 ft. North...
Tag this Judgment!A.T. Maheshwarappa and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
(Prayer: This CRL.A. is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the Judgment and Order Dated 26.4.2012 and 30.4.2012 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru in S.C.No.122/2011 in so far as he is concerned - convicting the Appellant/Accused No.2 for the offence P/U/S 302 R/W Section 34 of IPC and the Appellant/Accused No.2 sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs) each, in default to pay fine to undergo R.I. for a period of One Year for the offence P/U/S 302 R/W 34 of IPC.) 1. These appeals are by the convicted accused Nos.1 and 2 against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur, in Sessions Case No.122/2011 dated 26.4.2012 whereunder the accused Nos.1 and 2 are convicted for the offences punishable under section 302 r/w. section 34 of Indian Penal Code and are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- each, in default to pay f...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Karnataka Vs. Govinda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF JANUARY2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.648/2016 BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BASAVESWARNAGAR POLICE STATION BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SRI NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP) AND: GOVINDA SON OF KANNAN AGED33YEARS R/O NO.89, 13TH CROSS60FEET ROAD J.C.NAGAR, BENGALURU. PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION397R/W401OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED1512.2015 IN S.C.NO.94/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE LVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY PASSED IN RESPECT OF OFFENCES P/U/S399 402 OF IPC REGISTERED IN CR.NO.108/2011 OF BASAWESHWARANAGAR P.S. AND ALLOW THE ABOVE CRL.R.P.-. 2 - THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FOR RESERVED ON PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:06. 01/2017 AND COMING ON ORDER...
Tag this Judgment!N Jayaram Vs. The State of Karnataka,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF JANUARY2017BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.100744/2016 C/w CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100814/2016 CRIMINAL PETITION No.100744/2016 BETWEEN:1. 2. 3.4. N JAYARAM S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGE:50. YEARS, OCC: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, R/O: BELAGAVI. B R RAVIKANTHEGOWDA S/O RAMANNA, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, R/O: BELAGAVI. RAVINDRA K GADADE, AGE:40. YEARS, OCC: ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE R/O: BELAGAVI. B S ANGADI, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, R/O: CHIKODI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 2 5.6. R S BADADESAR, AGE:38. YEARS, OCC: CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R/O: ATHANI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. HANUMANT S/O LAKKAPPA DHARMATTI, AGE:36. YEARS, OCC: POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, R/O: KAGAWAD, TQ: ATHANI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. (By Sri : K L PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND1 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD....
Tag this Judgment!Aruna W/O Sudhir Lengade Vs. Madhukar Bapusaheb Lengade
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH ON THE30H DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR R.F.A.NO.4100/2012 C/W30112011 IN RFA NO4100OF2012BETWEEN1 ARUNA W/O SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:55. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 2. MAITHILI D/O. SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:33. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 3. AISHWARYA D/O. SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:30. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI M G NAGANURI, ADVOCATE) AND1 MADHUKAR BAPUSAHEB LENGADE AGE:70. YEARS SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs. 1A) 1(B) 1(C) 1(D) 2.3. 4.5.6. :2. : SMT.SUNITHA W/O MADHUKAR LENGADE AGE:64. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O23 KHANAPUR ROAD BELGAUM-590 006 SMT.SANJANA W/O RAHUL MIRAJKAR AGE:43. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O LENGADE BUILDING, CLUB ROAD BELGAUM-560 001 SHRI MAHAVEER MADHUKAR LENGADE AGE:40. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/...
Tag this Judgment!Vishalakshi Bhat Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by State Public P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayers: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR and complaint in Cr.No.01/2016 registered by respondent No.1 police for the offences P/U/S 420 of IPC at Annexure-A and B and etc. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR and complaint in Cr.No.345/2015(Now C.C.No.7833/2016) registered by respondent No.1 police for the offences P/U/S 406 and 420 R/W 34 of IPC at Annexure-A and B etc. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR and complaint in Cr.No.33/2016, registered by the respondent No.1 offence P/U/S 406 and 420 of IPC at Annexure-A and B etc. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR and complaint in Cr.No.747/2015, registered by respondent No.1 Police for the offence P/U/S 420 of IPC at Annexure-A and B etc. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR and complain...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »