Karnataka Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri. Ashok Kumar S Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-07-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT APPEAL No.3308/2016(T-RES) BETWEEN : SRI. ASHOK KUMAR.S, S/O LATE M.SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT42YEARS R/A #101, HIMA PRIYA APARTMENT, MARIYAN PALYA HEBBAL BANGALORE-560 024. (WRONGLY SHOWN AS R/AT NO.79, 4TH MAIN, BEHIND GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, HEBBAL, BENGALURU 560 024). ... APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJESWARA.P.N, ADVOCATE) AND :1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, "VANIJYA THERIGE, KARYALAYA", 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2 GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 009.2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, LVO-075, PEENYA BENGALURU-560 058.3. SRI JAGADEESHA.S S/O. LATE. M. SONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT49YEARS, R/AT No.79, BEHIND GOVT. HIGH SCHOOL, 4TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, HEBBAL, BENGALURU -560024. CLAIMING TO BE THE PROPRIETOR OF M/s. S.J.INDUSTRIES, No.C-144, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGAL...
J. Hemavathy Vs. The State of Karnataka, Department of Social Welfare, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-06-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the entire records leading to the order dtd 14.01.2014 and 04.03.2014 and quash Order No. HAI/HR/47(2)/2014 dtd 14.01.2014 (under Annx-AF to the W.P.) and the order of the Appellate Authority dtd 04.03.2014 (under Annx-AJ to the W.P.) passed by the R-3/Company by issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari and direct the R-3 to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith and grant all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and all benefits flowing from quashing Annx-AF and AJ as if the impugned orders were never in existence.) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 14.01.2014 passed by the disciplinary authority viz., the Director, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), thereby imposing punishment of dismissal from service on the ground that petitioner had obtained appointment in respondent - HAL by producing false caste certificate against a...
Maria Joseph @ Joseph Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order of conviction and sentence dated 12.12.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, FTC-V, Bangalore in S.C.No.373/2011, convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default of payment of fine he shall undergo R.I. for two years for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 12.12.2011 recorded in V- Fast Track (Sessions) Court, Bangalore City, on his file in S.C.No.373/2011 whereby the appellant herein is convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `50,000/- with default clause. 2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter the p...
Mansoor Naghnoor Vs. The State of Karnataka, Bengaluru and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint, FIR in Crime No.63/2016, registered by first respondent J.C.Nagar Police Station, Bangalore and all further investigation pending before court of VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore for Commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC.) 1. The petition coming on for Admission is heard for final disposal with the consent of counsel for the parties. The petition is admitted to file. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned State Public Prosecutor. 3. The petitioner is arraigned as an accused in a complaint filed by the second respondent before the jurisdictional police. It is the case of the complainant that the petitioner is known to him and that they are well acquainted. The complainant is said to be engaged in real estate business. It is alleged that the...
Sudeep Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
(Prayer: This miscellaneous first appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 04.08.2006 passed in MVC No.658/2003 on the file of the XVIII Addl. Judge and SCJ, Member MACT-4, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore, (SCCH-4), partly allowing the claim petition for comepnsation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. This is a claimant's appeal directed against the judgment and award dated 4.8.2006 in M.V.C.No.658/2003 on the file of the XVIII Additional Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-IV, Bangalore (SCCH-4) ('the Tribunal' for short) being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 2. Succinctly stated, the appellant/claimant filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989, contending that on 30.12.2002 while proceeding in his Maruti Car bearing registration No.KA-01/M-3946 on Bangalore-Mysore Road near Doddamalur at 4.00 p.m., the offending vehicle bearing registration No.KA-11/A-1599...
Shivashankar Chandrashekar Jotavar Vs. Poornima W/O Shivashankar Jotav ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
R IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KARNA TAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED TH IS THE1S T DAY OF S EP TEMB ER2016BEFORE THE HONBL E MR . JUS TI CE P.S .DIN ESH KUMAR RPFC NO.100 062/2 016 BE TWE EN : SHIVASHANKAR CHANDRASHEKAR JOTAVAR AGE:46. YEARS , OCC: I NS TRUC TOR , R/O: HOUSE NO.35 0, WARD NO.14 , MARADIMATH (KONNUR) 5 91 231 , TQ: GOKAK , DIS T: BE LAGAVI. ... PE TI TION ER (BY SRI M G NAGANURI, ADVOCATE.) AND1. 2 . 3 . POORNIMA W/O SHI VASHANKAR JO TA VAR AGE:34. YEARS , OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: C/O: S .G. KIT TUR , PLOT NO.1280 , NEAR JAIN BAS TI RAMTE ER TH NAGAR, B ELAGAVI-5 90016 , NOW A T KI TTU R RANI CHANNAMMA, RESIDEN TIAL SCHOOL, KI TUUR-5 91115 , TQ: BAI LHONGAL, DIS T: BE LAGAVI. KUMAR NANDAN S/O SHIVASHANKAR JO TA VAR AGE:5. YEARS , OCC : S TUDEN T, SINCE MINOR RE P. BY HIS NATURAL MOTHE R RESPONDEN T NO.1 . KUMARI SONAM D/O SHIVASHANKAR JO TAVAR2AGE:4. YEARS , OCC : S TUDEN T, SINCE MINOR RE P. BY HIS NATURAL MOTHE R RESPONDEN T NO.1 . ... RESPONDEN TS (R.1 NOTICE SE RV ED, R.2 AND R .3 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›