Karnataka Court September 2016 Judgments
Aishwarya S. Nayak and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to grant exemption to petitioner from the neet examination to seek admission by re-allocation to the R-5 college to the MBBS course for the year 2016-17 as the petitioner was already admitted to the MBBS course for the year 2015- 16 by issuing a writ of mandamus and etc.,) Jayant Patel, J. 1. All the petitions are preferred by the respective petitioners-students who were earlier granted admission for the academic year of 2015-2016 in the management quota pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.4770-4829/2016 preferred by Sridevi Medical College, wherein the interim order was granted, which subsequently came to be vacated by the Apex Court and the admissions were also cancelled. As per the petitioners, there were similarly situated students who were granted admission on the seats of CET as well as on COMED-K and this Court (NKJ and SSJ) vide order dated 23.06.2016 had direct...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Gupta Verses State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, praying to call for records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.397/2016 dated 17.8.2016 at Annexure-A and to quash the FIR in 397/2016 dated 17.8.2016 at Annexure-A as registered by first respondent.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner would contend that one of the reliefs claimed herein, is seeking the release of the vehicle that has been seized. However, he would seek to withdraw the petition insofar as such relief is concerned, with liberty to approach the Magistrate. 3. It is secondly contended that the petitioner, pursuant to a direction by this court, did approach the Magistrate in seeking bail. Though the matter had been adjourned on three occasions, ultimately, the Public Prosecutor was compelled to file his objections and now the matter is set down for further hearing on 6.10.2016. Inciden...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Sunil Gupta Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION NO.48585 OF2016(GM-RES) BETWEEN: Mrs. Sunil Gupta, (Mrs. K.S.Archana Gupta), Wife of Sunil Gupta, Aged 37 years, #S-711, 7th Floor, South Block, Manipal Centre, Dickenson Road, Bengaluru 560 042. (By Shri P. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate) AND:1. State of Karnataka, Represented by Station House Officer, Mahadevapura Police Station, Benglauru, Karnataka 560 048. PETITIONER22. Mr. Lavakumar, (By Shri K.R.Keshav Murthy, State Public Prosecutor-II for Respondent No.1) Vice President Liaison, Vaswani Estate Developers Private Limited, No.30, Vaswani Victoria, Victoria Road, Bengaluru 560 047. RESPONDENTS ***** This Writ Petition filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, praying to call for records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.397/2016 dated 17.8.2016 at Annexure- A and to q...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore and Another Vs. Shakuntala D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore in ITA No.1170/BANG/2008 dated 30.01.2009 and confirm the order of the appellate commissioner confirming the order passed by the Dy. Director of Income Tax, (Intl., Taxn.,) Circle-II(1), Bangalore and etc.,) 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench C' (for short 'ITAT') in ITA No.1170(BNG)/08, whereunder ITAT has allowed the appeal filed by the assessee in-part by concluding that assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'Act') as assessee had fulfilled all the conditions prescribed under said section. 2. Facts in brief which has led to filing of this second appeal by the revenue can be crystlised as under: For the assessment year 2003-04 a return of i...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of Mysore, Mysore and Another Vs. K. Nagamani and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the order dt.13.08.08, of the Learned Judge of the Family Court at Mysore on IA.Nos.1 and 2 in OS.No.30/08, as at Ann-A and issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing rejection of IA.Nos.1 and 2 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC., in OS.No.30/08, on the file of Learned Judge Family Court, Mysore. These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the order dt. 13.08.2008 passed on I.A.Nos. I and II in O.S.No.30 of 2008 in the court of the Family Court at Mysore as per Annexure-K.) 1. The petitioners in both these petitions are assailing the order dated 13.08.2008 passed by the Family Court, Mysuru on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.30/2008. The petitioner- State Bank of Mysuru in W.P.No.2739/2009 is the second defendant and the petitioner - Sri. K.Govindaraju in W.P.Nos.2998 a...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Bellappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 14.03.2012 passed in MVC No.106/2011 on the file of the District Judge, Member, MACT, Chamarajanagar, awarding a compensation of Rs.3,20,800/- with interest @ 6% P.A. pendete-Lite and future interest till Realization.) 1. Since these matters arise out of same accident and against common Judgment, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 2. These matters arise against the Judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chamarajanagar, ( Tribunal for short) in MVC 106, 107 and 108 of 2011. 3. Facts in brief are that the injured/claimant filed a petition before the Tribunal contending that on 01.05.2011, while he was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-02/Q-1807 along with his wife deceased Jayamma and son deceased Mahadevamurthy met with road traffic accident owing to the actionable negligence of the driver of KSRTC bus bearing regis...
Tag this Judgment!Matte Manjunatha Vs. State by Hosadurga, P.S. rep. by SPP, High Court ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 (1)(a)(b) of Cr.P.C., praying to modify the order and relax the conditions passed by the Hon ble Spl. II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga District dated 29.08.2016 in S.C.No.50/2016 pending on the file of Hon ble Spl. II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga District.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. This is a petition filed under Section 439(1)(a)(b) of Cr.P.C. for modification of the order passed by the Sessions Judge on his file in S.C.No.50/2016. The operative portion of the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge reads thus: The petitioner filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Accused is enlarged on bail after execution of personal bond for Rs.50,000/- (Fifty thousand) with like-sum two sureties and by directing to pay in a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) out of ...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Bellappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA M.F.A.No.6222/2012 c/w M.F.A.Nos.6225/2012 & 6226/2012 [MV]. IN M.F.A.No.6222/2012: BETWEEN : KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION OWNER/INTERNAL INSURANCE FUND SHANTHINAGAR, K.H.ROAD BANGALORE BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER ...APPELLANT (BY SRI H.R.RENUKA, ADV.) AND : BELLAPPA S/O PUTTAMADAPPA AGED ABOUT51YEARS R/O MELAJIPURA VILLAGE BADANAGUPPE POST KASABA HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK-571313. RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.Y.SREENIVASAN, ADV.) THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF M.V.ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED1403.2012 PASSED IN MVC NO.106/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, CHAMARAJANAGAR, - 2 - AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS.3,20,800/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. PENDETE-LITE AND FUTURE INTEREST TILL REALIZATION. IN M.F.A.No.6225/2012: BETWEEN : KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION OWNER/INTERNAL ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Matte Manjunatha Vs. State by Hosadurga p.s.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6706/2016 BETWEEN: SRI MATTE MANJUNATHA S/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT DURUGAMMA BEEDI HOSADURGA TOWN 577 527 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. (BY SMT.RATTIHALLI GEETHA VEERANNA, ADV.) AND: STATE BY HOSADURGA P.S. REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SRI B.VISWESWARAIAH, HCGP.) PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION439(1)(a)(b) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO MODIFY THE ORDER AND RELAX THE CONDITIONS PASSED BY THE HONBLE SPL. II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT DATED2908.2016 IN S.C.NO.50/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE SPL. II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 2 - ORDER Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court G...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Haritha Ravipati Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences fo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayers: This Wit Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned notification dtd.1.7.2015 issued by the R-1 vide Annexure-D. Direct the R-1 and R-2 to conduct fresh valuation in respect of answer scripts of theory paper I, II and III of the subject M.D. dermatology examination undertaken by the petitioner in June/July-2016 and consequently declare the petitioner to have passed in the said examinations. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the Respondents herein, especially R-2 university to get the Petitioner s answer scripts evaluated by a panel of four(4) individual examiners in accordance with Regulation 14(1) (b) of the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2001 ; This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R-1 to award additional marks to the answers given by the petitioner for question no.3, 5, 6, 7...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »