Karnataka Court August 2016 Judgments
Sri v G Hittalamani Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF AUGUST2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.43919 OF2016(S-KAT) BETWEEN: SRI V.G.HITTALAMANI S/O GOUDAPPA AGED ABOUT59YEARS, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH, BAILAHONGALA TALUK BELGAUM DISTRICT-591102 (BY SRI.MAHESH L, ADVOCATE FOR M/S.PANCHAJANYA ASSOCIATES) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (SERVICES B & C) RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, ...PETITIONER2M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. SRI. C.S.KADROLLI MAJOR, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH, HIREKERURU, HAVERI-581109 3. THE UNDER SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE 01. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD, AGA FOR R1 & R3; SRI.BALAGANGADHAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS PERTAININ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Surendra Nayak Vs. A M Mohammed Shafi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF AUGUST2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.43445/2016 (HRC) BETWEEN : SHRI SURENDRA NAYAK S/O. MUKUNDA NAIK, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, DOOR NO.44-340, GR. FLOOR, MANAR COMPLEX, BANTWALA, NEW ROAD, MANGALORE. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SACHIN B. S., ADV.) AND: A. M. MOHAMMED SHAFI S/O A. M. MOOSA HAJI, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, RESIDING AT SECO MAHAL, KAPRIGUDDA FALNIR, MANGALORE AND ALSO AT NO.1113, BARTON CENTRE, M. G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED2706.2016 IN R.R.P.2/2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, D.K. MANGALORE AD CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE RRP22011 AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC. HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING : THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY ... RESPONDENT2ORDER The petitioner, Mr. Surendra Nayak, has challenged the leg...
Tag this Judgment!Justice. Micheal f.saldanha (Retd.) Vs. Sri. m.p. Noronha (Melwyn Prak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.25452/2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: JUSTICE.MICHEAL F.SALDANHA (RETD.) S/O LATE SR JOHN ANTHONY SALDANHA AGED ABOUT70YEARS R/AT.NO.401, SILVER CREST, 13 REST HOUSE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 PETITIONER (By Sri.VIVEK REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W Sri.SUBBA REDDY K.N , Adv.,) AND:1. SRI.M.P.NORONHA (MELWYN PRAKASH NORONHA) ADVOCATE AND NOTARY AGED ABOUT49YEARS S/O LATE J M NORONHA II FLOOR, ROYAL CHAMBERS KODIALBAIL, MANGALORE 575 003 2.3. Mr. SATISH N VAIDYA S/O.NARAYANA VAIDYA, ADULT EDITOR OF KARAVALI ALE400C, BAIKAMBAPDY INDUSTRIAL AREA MANGALORE 575 011 Mrs.ROHINI SEETHARAM W/O.B.V.SEETHARAM MANAGING DIRECTOR OF2CHITRA PUBLICATION PRIVATE LTD., HAVING OFFICE A-400-C BAIKAMBAPDY INDUSTRIAL AREA MANGALORE 575 011 Mr.B.V.SEETHARAM DIRECTOR OF KARAVALI ALE CHITRA PUBLICATION PRIVATE LTD., HAVING OFFICE A-400-C BAIKAMBAPDY INDUSTRIAL AREA MANGALOR...
Tag this Judgment!C. Mruthyunjayaswamy and Others Vs. State by, Karnataka Lokayuktha Pol ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-22-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to quash the preliminary investigation report dated 21.7.2011 submitted by SR. Renuka Prasad - Inspector of Lokayuktha as per Annexure-A and consequently, the report of the First Information dated 21.7.2011 (Annexure-B) filed by Sri. Girish- Deputy Superintendent of Police in Crime No.28/2011 and all proceedings on the file of the XXIII Additional City Civil and Special Judge, Bangalore (CCH-23) in pursuance of Crime No.28/11 may be quashed. This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to a) quash the seizure proceedings in respect of the passbooks of the petitioner and also freezing of the accounts of the petitioner pertaining to i) SB No.160010027820 - Vysya Bank Limited, Banashankari, Bangalore - Annexure-E. ii) SB No.1072500100243201 ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri C Murthyunjayaswamy Vs. State
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-22-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST2016BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.21782 OF2014(GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION No.38450 OF2014(GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.38451 OF2014(GM-RES) WRIT PETITION No.38498 OF2014(GM-RES) CRIMINAL PETITION No.7166 OF2015IN W.P.No.21782 OF2014Sri. C. Mruthyunjayaswamy, Son of Late Channappa Shastre, Aged about 51 years, Presently working as Chief Engineer, National Highways, K.R.Circle, Bangalore 560 001. (By Shri V. Lakshminarayana, Senior Advocate for Smt. Shilpa Rani, Advocate) PETITIONER2Office of Lokayuktha, Represented by its Registrar, M.S.Buildings, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore 560 001. State by Karnataka Lokayuktha Police, Bangalore City Division, Bangalore 560 001. Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Lokayuktha. AND:1. 2. 3.4. (By Shri Venkatesh P.Dalwai, Advocte for Respondents 1 to 3; Shri. G. Devaraj, Advocate for Respondent No.4) The...
Tag this Judgment!Gangadhar and Others Vs. Somashekhar and Others
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-20-2016
(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 5.12.2011 passed in O.S.No.88/2007 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Bijapur, partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff.) Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. These appeals are heard and disposed of by this common judgment as the appeals arise out of the same suit. 2. The appeal in RFA 6001/2012 is filed by the plaintiffs. The facts as asserted by the plaintiffs was that the suit properties were their joint family properties. It was claimed that land bearing survey no.794/1+2+3 of Sarwad village, described at Item no.4 of the suit Schedule- A, was ancestral property and the remaining items of land were purchased overtime in the name of the father of the fourth defendant and the father of the plaintiffs, Mahalingappa, who was no more. The genealogical tree of the family is as under: GENEALOGY ( CHART ) = Respondent No.8/defendant No.11 stranger ...
Tag this Judgment!Shivappa H. Lamani Vs. State of Karnataka, By Its Principal Secretary, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying to quash the order dtd:1.7.2016 passed by the Hon'ble Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, at Bangalore in Matter Bearing Application No.6031/2016 vide Annexure-A and etc.) 1. Rule. 2. Mr.A.S.Ponnanna, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr.H.T.Narendra Prasad, learned AGA waive notice of Rule for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.S.Ponnanna, learned Additional Advocate General, also appears for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 7. Mr.K.N.Puttegowda, learned Counsel appears for respondent No.3. None appears for Mr.Hanumantharayappa-respondent No.6. 3. The present petition is directed against the order dated 01.07.2016 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal' for the sake of brevity), whereby for the reasons recorded in the order, the Tribunal has rejected the application and respondent Nos.1 and 2 were directed to give posting to the applicant within on...
Tag this Judgment!Revanappa Vs. Gangappa
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated: 07.04.2011 passed in R.A. No.44/2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Basavakalyan (Camp at Humnbad), dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2008 passed in O.S. No.26/2006 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.,) and JMFC at Humnabad.) 1. This appeal is preferred; by the appellant/ defendant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 7.4.2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Basavakalyan, camp at Humnabad dismissing R.A. No.44/2008 and confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2008 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Humnabad in O.S.No.26/2006. 2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant/defendant and also the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/plaintiff on admission. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant taken this Court to the judgment and decree passed by the C...
Tag this Judgment!Hemavathy Vs. The Director and Appellate Authority Scheduled Tribes We ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the impugned order at Ann-A, passed by the R2, dt.11.11.09, at Ann-B passed by the R1, dt.27.1.14, respectively.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the orders dated 11.11.2009 and 27.01.2014 impugned at Annexures-A and B respectively. 2. The petitioner who acquired her degree in Engineering (Industrial Production) had applied and was selected as Engineer-II in the third respondent company. While seeking employment she had relied on the caste certificate dated 14.01.1991. The said certificate indicated her to belong to the Jenu Kuruba caste which is a Schedule Tribe. As required, on being employed the third respondent employer referred the caste certificate for verification of its validity. The second respondent in that view issued notice to the petitioner. During the pendency of the proceedings, the family of the petitioner on gaining knowledge of the Gove...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka through Adrash Nagar Police Station, Bijapur Vs. Sa ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-18-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C. by the advocate for appellant/the Addl. SPP for the State praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 09.07.2010 passed in Criminal Appeal No.30/2008 on the file of the Fast Track Court-I/II at Bijapur, acquitting the accused/respondent for the offences P/U/S 337, 338 304-A of IPC.) 1. The judgment and order of acquittal dated 9th July 2010 passed by the FTC-I/II Bijapur in Criminal Appeal No. 30/2008 is called in question in this appeal preferred by the State. 2. The facts of the case that the complaint was lodged by PW 1 one Mr. Yatawari Shahani alleging that himself and other persons went nearby the shop of Sairaj Marbles in order to load the marble stones in the vehicle. As per the complaint averments the incident took place on 30.3.2006 when they all loading the marble stones in the 407 vehicle bearing No. KA-29- 6177 at about 10.30 a.m. It is the allegatio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »