Karnataka Court August 2016 Judgments
Babu @ Vishwanatha Vs. The State of Karnataka, By Bidadi Police Statio ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 16.8.2011 recorded in S.C.No.286/2008 by the I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, convicting the appellant/accused for the offence p/u/s 302 and 201 of IPC.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 16.8.2011 recorded by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, on his file in S.C.No.286/2008 whereby the appellant herein is convicted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (for short hereinafter referred to as "the IPC"). 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their original status before the Trial Court. 3. Briefly stated, the complainant/respondent Police, charge sheeted the first accused Seena @ Srinivasa and the second accused (appellant herein) in respect of the offences under...
Tag this Judgment!Gopala Vs. J. Revanna
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: This MSA is filed under S.100 of CPC., against the judgment and decree dated 14.03.2016 passed in R.A. No.3/2014 on the file of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Pandavapura, allowing the appeal filed under order 41 RULE 1 and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2014 passed in O.S.No.307/2009 on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC., Pandavapura, remanding back the matter to the trial court to provide opportunities to both sides with reference to the additional evidence produced at the appellate stage.) 1. The plaintiff is the appellant. He filed O.S. No. 307/2009 in the Court of Civil Judge, Pandavapura to pass decree of permanent injunction and restrain the defendant from interfering into his possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Written statement was filed and the suit contested by the defendant. Issues having been raised and during trial the plaintiff got examined himself as PW1 and examined two witnesses as PW2 and PW3 and marked Exs....
Tag this Judgment!Sri Gopala Vs. Revanna J
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2016 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO.55/2016 BETWEEN: SRI GOPALA S/O. SIDDASHETTI, AGED52YEARS CHIKKAMASEEDI ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428. (BY SRI R.PRAMOD, ADV.) AND: REVANNA J., S/O. JAVAREGOWDA AGED50YEARS, R/O. BEERASHETTAHALLI VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571 428. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI PRABHUGOUD B. TUMBIGI, ADV.) ... RESPONDENT2THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER S.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED1403.2016 PASSED IN R.A. NO.3/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PANDAVAPURA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED UNDER ORDER41RULE1AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED2001.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.307/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PANDAVAPURA, REMANDING BACK THE MATTER TO THE TRIAL COURT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES TO BOTH SIDES WITH REFERENCE TO THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE PRODUCED ...
Tag this Judgment!T. Nagaraja Gowda Vs. The State of Karnataka, Bangalore and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 23.04.2015 made in A.No.2729/2010 at Annex-A of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal and etc.) Final Order 1. Heard. Issue Rule. 2. With the consent of the learned Advocates appearing for both sides, the petition is finally heard. 3. The short facts of the case appears to be that on 26.10.1976, the petitioner was appointed as Primary School Assistant Teacher. On 27.8.2001, he was promoted as Head Master in the Government Higher Primary School. On 4.4.2002, he was promoted as Secondary School Assistant Teacher Grade-II . On 20.05.2002, the Medical Board advised him to change the cadre as he was suffering from chronic allergic bronchitis. On 4.11.2002, the second respondent submitted a proposal to the first respondent seeking approval for change of cadre of the petitioner from teaching to non-teaching cadre. On 20.1.2003, such permission was granted to change the...
Tag this Judgment!Danone Narang Beverages Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka, Repres ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, along with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to praying to quash the complaint vide Annexure-B C.C.No.829/2012 filed by the first respondent before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-I and the entire proceedings vide Annexure-A before the court pursuant to the said complaint and etc;) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner is said to be a private limited company engaged in the manufacture and distribution of packaged natural mineral water under the brand name of 'Qua'. It is claimed that the bottles distributed by the petitioner have labels affixed on the bottle, containing all the pre-printed information required to be provided, which is common to every bottle upon which such label is affixed, including the address of the manufacturer, nutrition...
Tag this Judgment!Danone Narang Beverages Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF AUGUST2016BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.13060 OF2013(GM-RES) BETWEEN: Danone Narang Beverages Private Limited, M/s. Danone Narang Beverages Private Limited, No.B-869, Sarkar Heritage, 2nd Floor, J.P.K.S.Complex, Kane Road, Bandstand, Bandra (West), Mumbai, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. J.Venkatesh. PETITIONER (By Shri Pradeep Nayak and Shri Arun Sri Kumar, Advocates) AND:1. State of Karnataka, Represented by the Inspector, Legal Metrology, Flying Squad-2, 2 No.1, Ali Asker Road, Bangalore 560 052.2. Mr. Shivraj Menon, Major, M/s. Drive India Enterprise Solutions Limited, No.159/1 and 160/1, Kannamangala, Whitefield Hoskote Road, Bangalore. RESPONDENTS (By Smt. R. Anitha, Government Pleader for Respondent No.1/State; Respondent No.2 served) ***** This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, along with Section 482 of the Code ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri T Nagaraja Gowda Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF AUGUST2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S. SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.6761/2016 [S-KAT]. BETWEEN: SRI T.NAGARAJA GOWDA AGED ABOUT62YEARS, S/O LATE SRI T.VENKATAPPA, RETIRED FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT, (RETIRED ON3101.2014) OFFICE OF THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 036. R/AT H.No.649, JAYANAGARA8H CROSS, TEKAL ROAD, KOLAR - 563 101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI P.RAJASHEKAR, ADV.) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SACHIVALAYA - II, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2 THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS O/O THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, KALASIPALYAM...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. R. A. Nagendranath Vs. The Karnataka State Road Transport Corpora ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF AUGUST, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION NO.24879 OF2016(S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: R. A. NAGENDRANATH S/O. LATE AMARENDRANATH, AGED59YEARS, CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, CLASS-I, SELECTION GRADE, K.S.R.T.C., SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE, (PRESENTLY ON DEPUTATION AS THE CHIEF PLANNING AND STATISTICAL OFFICER, N.W.K.R.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBBALLI). (BY SRI SUBRAMANYA JOIS, SENIOR ADV. FOR SRI SUMANTH L. BHARADWAJ, ADV.) PETITIONER THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. RAJENDER KUMAR KATARIA MAJOR, MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICE, K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU. AND:1. 2. 2 3.4. INQUIRY OFFICER ROOM NO.GF-18, K.S.R.T.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU. CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER (DEFAULT) K.S.R.T.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU. (BY MS. H. R. RENUKA, ...
Tag this Judgment!Mr Bhargav B L Vs. Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Law College
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29h DAY OF AUGUST, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION NO.10458 OF2016EDN AD) PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN, ADVOCATE) BETWEEN: MR. BHARGAV.B.L AGED ABOUT25YEARS, S/O SRI K.V.LAKSHMINARAYANA, R/AT NO.54/55, CHALUKYANAGARA, NEAR PRASANNACHANDRASHEKARA ASHRAMA, ANDRAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 091. AND:1. 2. 3.4. BAR COUNCIL OF KARNATAKA, DR.RAM MANOHAR LOHIA LAW COLLEGE, NO.1 & 2, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, GOTTIGERE, BENGALURU 560 083. KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY, SUTAGATTI ROAD, NEAR RTO OFFICE, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI 580 025. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA21 ROUSE AVENUE INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEAR BAL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 110 002. 2 KGID BUILDING, NEXT TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SRI C.N.MAHADESHWARN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 GANAPATHI BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2 GEETHADEVI M.P, ADVOCATE FOR R3 NATARAJ.G, ADVOCATE FOR R4 RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CO...
Tag this Judgment!M. Venkatesh Murthy Vs. State of Karnataka, By Karnataka Lokayuktha Po ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated 6.2.2013 passed by the XXIII Additional City Civil and sessions Judge and Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act, Bangalore City in Spl.C.C.No.33/2013 thereby taking cognizance against the petitioner and ordering to register a case and issue summons and consequently the entire proceedings pending thereon in so far as it relates to the petitioner/accused herein.) 1. Heard the learned Senior Advocate Shri C.H. Jadhav appearing for the petitioner in Crl.P.7293/2013 and the learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.7955/2013. 2. The present petitioners are said to be arraigned as Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 respectively. It transpires that the complainant - Respondent No.2 herein had lodged a complaint on 25.04.2012 to contend that he is a contractor and that he has been doing contract work for the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and that there was l...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »