Karnataka Court July 2016 Judgments
Mahadevi Vs. Mallikarjun and Others
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: This RFA is filed against the order dated 04.09.2013 passed in O.S. No. 294/2002 on IA No. 19 pending on the file of the III Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Gulbarga, allowing the I.A.No. 19 filed by the applicant/plaintiff u/o 23 Rule 1 of CPC and the plaintiff is hereby permitted to withdraw the suit.) Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. The appellant was defendant No.3 in a suit for partition filed by the Respondent No.1. The respondent No.2 was the head of the family and appellant was his daughter. 2. During pendency of the partition suit, the first respondent, it is alleged by the appellant, had in collusion with the other respondents sought to withdraw the suit in order to defeat the rights of the present appellant, and without determining and ignoring the counter claim of the appellant and without allowing transposition of the appellant as plaintiff in the above suit, the trial court had allowed withdra...
Tag this Judgment!Garden City Fashions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Karnataka Industrial Areas Developm ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayers: This Writ Appeal is filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ Petition No.27795/2010(GM-KIADB) dated 10/11/2011. This W.P. is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Order dated 7.8.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent vide Annexure-X and quash the possession certificate dated 27.6.2011 issued by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-Y and etc.) Jayant Patel, J. 1. As in both these matters, common questions are involved, they are being considered simultaneously. 2. The facts of the case are that on 15.09.2005, the appellant-original petitioner made an application for allotment of land measuring 8100 square meters at EPIP, Whitefield, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as land in question/subject land). The appellant deposited the amount of Rs.24,00,000/- towards 20% of the cost of the land and another sum of Rs.2,000/- as application fee. (Parties shall be referred as petitioner/Appellant a...
Tag this Judgment!V.S. Krithika Vs. The Director, Director of Lokashikshana and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: This WP is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records relating to the order dated 28.04.2016 in A. No.9420/2014 passed by the Hon ble KAT vide Annex-A, peruse and quash the said order as unsustainable in law and erroneous being contrary to the law laid down etc.) Jayant Patel, J. 1. Rule. Mr. D.Nagaraj, learned Additional Government Advocate, appears for respondents 1 and 2. With the consent of the learned Advocates appearing for both the sides, the petition is finally heard. 2. The short facts of the case appear to be that the petitioner was working as Typist with the respondents. As per the petitioner, after the decision of the Apex Court in case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vs. Umadevi and others, reported at 2006(4) SCC page 1, her case was required to be considered for regularization. However, as her case was not considered for regularization, the petitioner approached the Tribunal by preferring Application...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the President Officer, Fast Track Court No.I at Gulbarga, in Sessions Case No.316/2006 dated 03.07.2010, thereby convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Sections 121, 122, 124(A) of Indian Penal Code, under Section 25 of Arms Act 1959 and under Section 4 and 5 of explosive Acts 1908 and the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and shall also pay the fine amount of Rs.25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 121 of Indian Penal Code, further the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and shall also pay the fine amount of Rs.25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 121 of Indian Penal Code, further the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and shall also pay the fine amount of Rs.25,000/- for ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Mahadevi D/O Revanasiddappa Vs. Mallikarjun S/O Revansiddappa Saj ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.6054 OF2013Appellant Between: Smt. Mahadevi D/o Revanasiddapppa Age:52. years, Occ: School Teacher R/o Hagargundagi Now residing at Gulbarga 585 103. (By Sri J.Augustin, Advocate) And:1. 1A Mallikarjun S/o Revanasiddappa Sajjan Age: Major (As in Plaint) Occ: Agriculture R/o Hagaragundagi 585 308. R/o Hagaragundagi 585 308. Tq & District: Gulbaraga Smt. Vijayalaxmi W/o Late Mallikarjun Age:45. years, Occ: House wife R/o Hagaragundagi 585 308 Tq & Dist: Gulbarga 2 (Presently at C/o Sri Ashok Sajjan Teacher, Post: Fartabad Tq & Dist: Gulbarga Revanasiddappa S/o Malleshappa Sajjan Age: Major (As in Plaint) Occ: Agriculture R/o Hagaragundagi and Presently at H.No.II-1771/1 Shivaganga Nivas Sajjan Building Vidyanagar, Gulbarga 585 103. .Dead Ravikumar S/o Revansiddappa Sajjan No.3, Age ...
Tag this Judgment!Garden City Fashions Pvt Ltd Vs. Karnataka Industrial Areas Developmen ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA WRIT APPEAL NO.18037/2011(GM-KIADB) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.48399/2012(GM-KIADB) IN W.A.NO.18037/2011 BETWEEN: GARDEN CITY FASHIONS PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT NO.84, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE-560022 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MR.M.N.CHITTIAPPA ...APPELLANT (BY SRI.MANMOHAN P N, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R P BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KIADB, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R P BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 3. M/S NANDI CONSTRUCTIVE NO.95/3, 3RD FLOOR, GOWRASRI ARCADE MARATHAHALLI, K R PURAM, OUTER RING ROAD, DODDANEKKUNDI, BANGALORE-560037 4. 2 THE STATE LEVEL SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE COMMITTEE, KARNATAKA UDYOG MITRA, A GOVERNM...
Tag this Judgment!Smt v S Krithika Vs. The Director
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.34340/2016(S-KAT) BETWEEN: SMT. V. S. KRITHIKA, W/O. N. SEETARAM, AGED ABOUT51YEARS, WORKING AS TYPIST, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF LOKASHIKSHANA, 6TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003. (By SRI. RANGANATHA S. JOIS, ADV.) ... PETITIONER THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF LOKASHIKSHANA (MASS EDUCATION), 6TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, AND:1. 2 BANGALORE-560 003. THE SECRETARY, PRIMARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (By SRI. D. NAGARAJ, AGA) 2. THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS RELATING TO THE ORDER DATED2804.2016 IN A. NO.9420/2014 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KAT VIDE ANNEX-A, PERUSE AND QUASH THE SAID ORDER AS UNSUSTAINABLE IN LAW AND ERRONEOUS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAW LAID DOWN ETC....
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Dinesh Gowda Vs. The State - Through the Sub
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY, 2016 :BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION No.3060/2016 BETWEEN:1. MR. DINESH GOWDA, S/O KRISHNAPPA GOWDA, AGED28YRS., R/AT KARADIKANA HOUSE, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST.2. MR. SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGED27YRS., S/O LINGAPPA GOWDA, R/AT PADIKARA HOUSE, MITHABAGILU VILLAGE, DIDUPE POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DIST. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. P. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WHITEFIELD POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY. (REP. BY THE S. P. P., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. (BY SRI. CHETAN DESAI, HCGP) ... RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION438CR. P. C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR. NO.302/2015 OF WHITEFIELD P.S., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S120, 307, 376, 420, 506 OF IPC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON2706.2016, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEME...
Tag this Judgment!Shilpa W/O Praveen S R D/O D M Shivakumar Sharma Vs. Praveen S R S/O S ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JULY2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA MISC.FIRST APPEAL NO.103381/2014 (FC) BETWEEN: Smt.Shilpa W/o Praveen S.R. D/o D.M.Shivakumar Sharma 27 years, Presently at Door No.253 Ward No.1, N.S.Murthy Compound, Sandur Bellary District. (By Ms.V.Vidya Iyer, Adv.) AND: Praveen S.R. S/o S.P.Rameshwaraiah 32 years Software Engineer R/a Door No.505/A20h Ward, Moka Road Gandhinagar Bellary. (By Sri.S.S.Yadrami, Adv.) .. APPELLANT .. RESPONDENT2This appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of the Family judgment and decree Courts Act, 1984, against the dt.30.10.2014 passed in Matrimonial Case No.221/2013 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, at Bellary, allowing the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. This appeal having been heard and reserved for judgment on 12.7.2016 and coming on for Pronouncement of judgment this day, Rathnakala J., delivered...
Tag this Judgment!Government of India and Another Vs. Dr. Raghunath Sharma and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order passed by the central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore bench in O.A.Nos.720 and 721/2013 dated 05.11.2015 vide Annex-C to writ petition and etc.) 1. Rule. Mr. Venkatesh Kumar B.S., learned Counsel appears for the respondents and waives notice of Rule. 2. With the consent of learned Advocate appearing for both the sides, the petitions are finally decided. 3. The short facts of the case appear to be that the respondents were not considered as fit for promotion on account of not reaching the requisite benchmark in Annual Confidential Record (for short ACR) for the last five years. As per the respondents, when ACR grading was given, all the columns before reaching to the conclusion of grading were not filled up by the competent officer and only final grading was given. As the respondents were not found fit for the selection, they approached the Central Admin...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »