Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF JUNE2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.20882 OF2016(KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN : Sri N.Chandra Reddy, Son of Late Narayana Reddy, Aged about 64 years, Residing at No.65, Govindashetty Palya, Near Electronic City, Hosur Main Road, Bangalore 560 100. ... Petitioner (By Sri D.P.Mahesh, Advocate) AND:1. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, M.S.Building, Bangalore 560 001.2. The Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore South Sub-Division, Kandaya Bhavana, Bangalore 560 009.3. The Special Tahasildar, Anekal Taluk, Anekal 562 106. 2 4. Shankar Reddy @ Shankarnarayana @ Shankarappa, Son of Late Veerareddy, Residing at No.54/A, Pem Nivasa, 3rd Cross, Kaveri Layout, Thavarekere Main Road, Bangalore 560 029. Respondents (By Sri A.G.Shivanna, AAG and Sri T.L.Kiran Kumar, AGA for R1 to R3: Sri G.D.Aswathanarayana, Advocate for R4) This writ petition is filed u...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 14.03.2016 passed by R2 in R.A.(A)67/2015-16 at Annexure-A as the same is arbitrary, illegal and without authority of law, etc.) 1. The petitioner has called into question the order, dated 14.03.2006 (Annexure-A) passed by the second respondent Assistant Commissioner taking up the Appeal No.67/2015-16 for reconsideration based on the representation and application of the respondent No.4. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the Tahasildar effected M.R.No.23/1997-98 in respect of the land measuring 30 guntas at Sy.No.98/11 of Rayasandra Village. By the said M.R., the mutation entry and the khatha were effected in favour of the respondent No.4. The petitioner challenged the said M.R. by way of appeal in 2015 invoking Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'KLR Act'). On finding that the respondent No.4 had not purchased the land standing a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15T H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100100/2015 BETW EEN: SMT. PUSHPA W /O. YESHW ANT PATIL, AGE ABO UT22YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O. C/O. RAMACHANDRA HUVAPPA KUGAJI, NANDIHAL LI VILL AGE, TQ & DIST: BELAGAVI (BY SRI RAMACHANDRA A. MALI, ADV.) .PETITIONER AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY HIGH COURT SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARW AD BENCH, DHARW AD.2. SRI. YESHW ANT S/O. TUKARAM PATIL, AGE:30. YEARS, OCC: DEFENCE SERVICE R/O. KUNDAL VILL AGE, TQ:KHANAPUR, DIST:BEL AGAVI.3. SRI.TUKARAM S/O. YESHW ANT PATIL, AGE:61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KUNDAL VILL AGE, TQ:KHANAPUR, DIST:BEL AGAVI.4. SMT. JIJABAI S/O. YESHW ANT PATIL, AGE:56. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOL D, R/O. KUNDAL VILL AGE, TQ:KHANAPUR, DIST:BELGAVI. (BY SRI RAJ A RAGHAVENDRA NAI K, HCGP FO R R1; SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADV. FOR R2 TO R4) .RESPONDENTS :2. : THIS CRIMINAL R EVISION PETITION IS FI ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.No.16233/2013 (S-RES) BETWEEN: Smt.K.Seethamma, Professor, Aged 57 years, Department of Economics and Registrar (Adhoc), Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi Campus, Bangalore 560 056. (By Sri H.Subrahmanya Jois, Senior Counsel for Sri K.C.Shanthakumar, Adv.) AND:1. The State of Karnataka, PETITIONER Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, M.S.Building, Vidhana Veedhi, Bangalore 560 001.2. The Vice Chancellor, Bangalore University, Jnana Bharati Campus, Bangalore 560 056. RESPONDENTS (By Sri Aditya Sondhi, Addl. Adv. General for Sri D.Ashwatahppa, AGA. for R1, Sri T.P.Rajendra Kumar Sungay, Adv. for R2 This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to concerning and connected with impugned notification dated 04.04.2013 vide Annexure-A from the 1st resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to concerning and connected with impugned notification dated 04.04.2013 vide Annexure-A from the 1st respondent, peruse the same, and declare and quash the said notification as arbitrary, irrational, illegal and unsustainable in law.) 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is calling in question notification dated 04.04.2013 issued by the State Government through the Department of Higher Education, vide Annexure-A, thereby withdrawing the ad hoc in-charge arrangement made by posting the petitioner to discharge the duties as Registrar of Bangalore University. 2. Facts leading to this writ petition, stated in nutshell are that petitioner is a Professor and Head of the Department of Economics in Bangalore University. As the post of Registrar was vacant, petitioner was posted there on 20.02.2013 to discharge the duties as an ad hoc and temporary arrangement. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.39211/2015 (GM-EDN) BETWEEN: JENNIFER.A W/O. EMMANUEL ISRAEL, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, RESIDING AT #10/3, 6TH MAIN, ITC COLONY, COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE. PETITIONER ESIC COLLEGE OF NURSING (UNDER MINSITRY OF LABOUR & GOVT OF INDIA), #70, APPAREDDY PALYA, 7TH MAIN, INDRANAGAR, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, (BY SRI.C.M.POONACHA, ADV.) AND:1. 2.3. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, KARNATAKA, 4TH T BLOCK, BANGALORE 560 041. REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR (INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL, COMBINED COUNCILS BUILDING KOTLA ROAD, TEMPLE LANE2OPP. MATA SUNDRI COLLEGE, NEAR I.T.O., NEW DELHI- 110 002. (BY SMT.M.P.GEETHADEVI, ADV.. FOR R1) ...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 UNIVERSITY TO ISSUE THE ADMIT CARD/HALL TICKET PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO WRITE HER2D YEAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondents to take such other steps to facilitate the seventh day Adventist group of students from taking up Economics and History subjects Schedules on o2.07.2016 and 09.07.2016 respectively, by rescheduling the same to any other day of the week to facilitate the said group denominations of Christians to write Examination by issuing a revised time-table.) 1. Petitioner is seeking for issuance of issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to take steps to facilitate the Seventh Day Adventist Group of students from taking up examination scheduled to be held on 02.07.2016 and 09.07.2016 in Economics and History subjects by re-scheduling the same to any other day of the week and to facilitate the said group of denominations of Christians to write examination by issuing a revised time table. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has taken notice on behal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF JUNE, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NOS.31681-31682/2016 (EDN-EX) SOUTH CENTRAL INDIA UNION OF SDA, NO.98, SPENCER ROAD FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION WING DR. PRASANNA BETWEEN:1. 2. MASTER JUSTIN JOSH SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN-FATHER SRI JAYASHANKER S/O SRI. JAYASHANKER AGED ABOUT17YEARS R/AT NO.37, 2ND CROSS HUTCHINS ROAD BANGALORE-560 084 (BY SRI.R.A. DEVANAND, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONERS THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA REP. THROUGH UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMETN OF EDUCATION VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, SAMPIGE ROAD AND:1. 2. 2 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.PUTTIGE R RAMESH, AMICUS CURIAE; SRI D. NAGARAJA, AGA AND SMT. PRAMODINI KISHAN, HCGP) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 R/w Sec.401 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for records in Criminal Appeal No.162/2014 on the file of Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum and set aside the order dated 17.03.2015 made in Criminal Appeal No.162/2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum as the same being not sustainable in law.) 1. The petitioner had filed Crl.Misc.No.20/2012 by invoking the provisions of PWDV Act, 2005 (for short, the Act ). The JMFC II at Belgaum, allowed the petition in part and directed the respondent No.2 herein i.e., husband of the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.6,000/- p.m. and Rs.25,000/- as compensation and damages to the petitioner. The reliefs sought against the other respondents was rejected. 2. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal under S.29 of the Act. There being delay of 78 days, I.A.1 was filed under S.5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. Statement of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
S. Sujatha, J. 1. Since identical issues are involved in these matters, all these cases are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by this common order. 2. Petitioner is an undertaking of Government of Karnataka engaged in power distribution. The Petitioner Company has established various 66/1, KV MUSS Stations in different parts of Mysore. The respondents claiming to be the workmen of the petitioner Company, filed claim statements in the reference made by the Government of Karnataka for adjudication of the dispute of refusal to give work to the workmen. It was inter alia contended that they have joined the services of the petitioner as operators. Though they have rendered unblemished record of service to the petitioner for more than 240 days, the petitioner without following the procedure prescribed under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short) refused to give work to the respondents. Accordingly, they sought for reinstatement with back-wages. Petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!