Karnataka Court May 2016 Judgments
Mohammed Razhur Rehman @ Umesh and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-10-2016
(Prayers: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the Order dtd:17/19.12.11 passed by the P.O., FTC-II, Bangalore City in S.C.No.539/06 convicting the appellants/accused for the offence p/u/s 120b, 121-a, 121 of IPC and Sec. 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act and Sec.25 and 26 of the Arms Act and the appellants/accused are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence p/u/s 120b of IPC and the appellants/accused are further sentenced to undergo S.I. for 7 yrs., and shall pay fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default to undergo further S.I. for a period of one year for the offence p/u/s 121-a of the IPC and the appellants/accused are further sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence p/u/s 121 of IPC and the appellant Nos.2, 3, 5/accused Nos.2, 4 and 6 are sentenced to undergo S.I. for 7 yrs., and shall pay fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default to undergo further S.I. of one year for the offence p/u/s 5 of the Explosive Sub...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd., and Others Vs. The D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
(Prayer: RFA No.483/2016 is filed under S.96 R/W Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC., against the judgment and decree dated 15.02.2016 passed in O.S.No.3639/2010 on the file of the XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, at Bengaluru, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction.) 1. These appeals are by the plaintiffs in the suits filed to pass declaratory decree(s) that the communication(s) of the Bangalore Development Authority (for short 'BDA') vide (Exs.P9 to P44) as illegal and for grant of permanent injunction against the defendants - BDA and its Officers, from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule shop premises. For convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the plaintiffs' and 'the defendants'. 2. The plaintiffs filed 41 separate suits in respect of the shop premises situated in Austin Town and Indiranagar Shopping Complexes of the BDA. The plaintiffs having occupied the respective shop premise(s) by virtue of the licence(s) issued by...
Tag this Judgment!The Karnataka State Financial Corporation, Rep. by Managing Director, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
(Prayer: This RFA is filed under S.96 r/w Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree Dated 18.6.2009 passed in O.S.No.9422/1998 on the file of the XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, Ordering the suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction.) 1. The defendant Nos.1 and 2 in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction are the appellants in this appeal. The suit was filed by the 1st respondent herein against the appellants and respondent No.2 / defendant No.3, on 09.12.1998, to declare the recovery proceedings initiated against him as a surety to defendant No.3 by defendant Nos.1 and 2 as per a notice dated 24.02.1998 and the proposed auction sale of the suit schedule property is illegal and to restrain the defendants from treating the suit schedule property as security for any loan or from meddling with it or from auctioning the same. For convenience, the parties will be referred by their rank in the suit. 2. The plaintiff's case in brief is, that he is th...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka Fisheries Development Vs. The Deputy Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF MAY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.483/2016 C/W RFA NOS.458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 539, 552, 578 & 579 OF2016BETWEEN: KARNATAKA FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR V.K. SHETTY, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, SHOP PREMISES NO.34 & 35, BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.483/2016) B.R. HARISH AGED ABOUT60YEARS, S/O. B.A. RAMAPPA GOWDA, M/s. SPECTRA FOODS SHOP NO.27 & 28, BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.458/2016) PUSHPA RAI AGED ABOUT52YEARS W/O. RAMESH RAI SHOP PREMISES NO.37 BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, 2 BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.459/2016) SRI LI CHING LIN AGED ABOUT60YEARS S/O. LATE LI YUNG CHUNG SHOP PREMISES NO.07 AUSTIN TOWN ...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Jayaram Alva Vs. Commissioner for Hindu Religious Institutions and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for records and to set aside the impugned order dated 12.5.2011 passed by the first respondent and produced hereto as Annexure-A.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The brief facts as stated are, that Shri Durga Parameshwari Temple, Kateel, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District is an ancient temple. It is a temple notified as a religious endowment under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1997 Act' for brevity). It is stated that the temple has been managed and administered by an ancient noble family, Devashya. It is stated that the said Devashya family owned large tracts of land, comprised in four villages, including that of Kondemoola. It is said that the family also owned large Guthu houses, of which Kodethur Guthu was one, situated at Mennabettu village. It is claimed that with t...
Tag this Judgment!R. Sridhar and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 5.3.2016 at Annexure-C issued by first respondent and to strike down Section 29G(i) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 as being unsconstitutiona and unworkable.) 1. These petitions are heard and disposed of by this common order. 2. In the writ petition in WP 19162/2016, the facts stated are as follows. The petitioner was said to be working earlier in the cadre of Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies and was the Secretary, Karnataka State Warehousing Corporation, Bangalore. He was then said to have been promoted to the cadre of Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies. He was then said to have been deputed to the Kolar - Chickballapur District Co-operative Milk Producers' Union Limited, the fifth respondent herein as the Managing Director, by an order dated 5.3.2016. He was said to have been accordingly relieved from his earlier post of Secreta...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›