Karnataka Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Alliance Business School, Bengaluru and Others Vs. Madhukar G. An ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
1. Heard Sri.D.N. Nanjunda Reddy and Sri. Jayakumar S. Patil, learned Senior Advocates appearing for petitioners and Sri.R. Nagendra Naik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 arid 2. 2. Petitioners are seeking for the following relief: (a) Issue an appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the notification under challenge i.e., Notification dated 29th March, 2016 bearing No.ADM-I, (A)/213/2016 (true photocopy produced at Annexure-A). Under the impugned Notification learned Principal District Judge, Bengaluru has transferred the suit O.S.No. 1094/2016 from XX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-32) court to IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, (CCH-5). 3. Writ petitioners are plaintiffs and respondents are defendants in O.S. 1094/2016. Plaintiffs have instituted said suit for the relief indicated in the plaint which is at Annexure-G. An interlocutory application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 also came to be filed by the pl...
The Chairman, Central Board Of Excise and Customs, New Delhi and Anoth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: This writ appeal is filed under Section 4 of the High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.31835 of 2013 dated 11.01.2016.) 1. The writ petitioner is a public limited company carrying on business of manufacture and export of gold jewellery and gold products. 2. Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, envisages power of the Central Government to grant exemption from duty. On March 17, 2012, the Central Government issued a notification No.12 of 2012 - Customs, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and in supersession of the notification dated March 1, 2012, as the Central Government was satisfied that it was necessary in the public interest so to do, to exempt the goods of the description specified in column (3) of the Table mentioned in the said notification or column (3) of the said Table read with the relevant list appended thereto, as the case may be, and falling within the Chapter, hea...
Gopal Reddy Vs. Munirajamma and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to quash the proceedings initiated on the basis of the PCR No.1/2006 and registration of Cr.No.58/2016 against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 3(20)(i), 3(1) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 and under section 415, 416, 417, 418, 420 of IPC and subsequent investigation by the police and allow the petition.) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition praying to quash the proceedings in PCR No.1/2016 on the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru and Cr.No.58/2016 of Electronic City Police Station registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(i)(ii) and 3(i)(viii) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sections 415, 416, 417, 418 and 420 of IPC. 2. It is stated, G.P.A. was executed by Smt. Puttamma, Sri. Rudrappa and Smt. Padma in favour of the petitioner in respec...
Kareppa Vs. Tahasildar Jamkhandi, Bagalkot District and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash order passed by Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Jamkhandi, in Execution Petition No. 7/2014 dated 23.03.2015 vide Annexure-G and in alternative Hon ble Court pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other suitable order or direction directing respondents to acquire portion of land occupied by road.) 1. These writ petitions are filed challenging the order dated 23rd March 2015 passed by the Executing Court dismissing the execution petition filed by the petitioner as not maintainable. 2. Petitioner had filed O.S. No. 48/2009 against the respondents herein seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants/respondents herein from constructing any road on the suit land without following due process of law. The suit was decreed on 27.03.2012 restraining the defendants from constructing any road on the suit land without due process of law. Petitioner herein filed ...
The Chairman Vs. M/S. Rajesh Exports Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12h DAY OF APRIL, 2016 R PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT APPEAL NO.316 OF2016(T-TAR) BETWEEN:1. THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 037.2. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEAR IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI - 110 037. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI PRABHULING K. NAVADGI, ADDL. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA APPEARING ALONG WITH SRI Y HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. RAJESH EXPORTS LIMITED NO.4, BATAVIA CHAMBERS, KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, KUMARA PARK EAST, BANGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MR. RAJESH MEHTA2AGED:51. YEARS S/O JASWANTHRAI MEHTA ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPEARING FOR SRI.H.N.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE FOR M/s. KESVY & CO., ADVOCATES) - - - This writ appeal is filed under Section 4 of the High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.31835 of 2013 d...
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited Vs. Emta Coal Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 12th day of April, 2016 R PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT APPEAL Nos.92 & 281 OF2016(GM-TEN) C/w WRIT APPEAL Nos.183-184 OF2016(GM-TEN) & WRIT APPEAL Nos.275 & 291 OF2016(GM-TEN) Writ Appeal Nos. 92 & 281 of 2016 BETWEEN: Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, A Government Company under the Provision of Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered office at Shakthi Bhavan # 82, Race Course Road, Bangalore-560 001, Represented by its Asst. General Manager (Law) Mr. R.Murthy ..... APPELLANT (By Sri Jayakumar S.Patil, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ajay J.Nandalike) AND:1. EMTA Coal Limited, 5B, Nandalal Basu Sarani, 2 Kolkata 70071 Through its constituted attorney Mr.C.P.Somnath Panth. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, 104, Marielle Apartments, #3 Magrath Road, Bangalore-560 025, Through its Managing Director Mr. Ujjal Kumar Upadhaya. State of Karnataka, Represented by the P...
M/S Ideb Buildcon Vs. Mr Narinder Malik
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12h DAY OF APRIL2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1273/2015 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1274/2015 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1275/2015 IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1273/2015 BETWEEN:1. M/S IDEB BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED No.7, SIGMA SOFT TECH PARK, 9 AND10FLOOR, DELTA BLOCK, WHITEFIELD ROAD, VARTHUR KODI, BANGALORE-560008 2. MR. H S BEDI S/O LATE MR. I S BEDI, AGED ABOUT57YARS, R/AT177 DIAMOND DISTIRCT, AIRPORT ROAD, KODIHALLI, BANGALORE-560038 3. MR AVNEET BEDI W/O MR. H S BEDI, AGED ABOUT56YARS, R/AT177 DIAMOND DISTIRCT, AIRPORT ROAD, KODIHALLI, BANGALORE-560038 4. MR. OAN ALI ZAHID2S/O LATE MR. QURBAN HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT60YEARS, No.C-712, GOWRI APARTMENTS, NEW BEL ROAD, RMV-2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560054 (By Sri: RAVI B. NAIK, SR COUNSEL FOR SRI: ARVIND KAMATH K, ADV.) AND: MR NARINDER MALIK S/O HIRANAND MALIK, AGED ABOUT62YEARS, R/AT No.778, HAL2D STAGE, 13TH MAIN,...
State by Sanjayanagar P S, Bangalore Vs. Deepak Kumar and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Crl.A. filed U/S.378(1)and(3) Cr.P.C by the State P.P. for the State praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant leave to file an Appeal against the Judgment of Acquittal Dt.21.1.10 passed by the P.O. FTC-V, Bangalore in S.C.NO.7/03-acquitting the Respondents/Accused for the offence P/U/S 498(A), 304(B), 302, 306, 201 r/w 34 of IPC and Sec. 3(1), 4 and 6 of D.P. ACT.) 1. The judgment of acquittal passed by the Fast Track Court-V in S.C.7/03 is called in question by the State represented by Sanjaynagar police station in this appeal. 2. Respondents in the appeal were the accused in S.C.7/03 against whom charge sheet was filed for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B, 306bread with Section 34, I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Later on, Section 302, I.P.C. came to be invoked against them. After a full-fledged trial, they have been acquitted. 3. The case on hand relates to the death of a married lady-Smt.Radha, daughter of PW3-Ra...
State by Sanjayanagar P S Vs. Deepak Kumar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF APRIL, 2016 P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER A N D THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.623/2010 BETWEEN: STATE BY SANJAYANAGAR P S BANGALORE (By Sri: P.M. NAWAZ, SPP) AND:1. DEEPAK KUMAR ... APPELLANT S/O LEHAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT39YEARS NO.145, 9TH MAIN3D CROSS, HIB COLONY BANGALORE-94 2.3.4. 2 SHANTHI BAI W/O LEHAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT57YEARS NO.145, 9TH MAIN3D CROSS, HIB COLONY BANGALORE LEHAR SINGH S/O LATE KESARI LAL, AGED ABOUT60YEARS NO.145, 9TH MAIN3D CROSS, HIB COLONY BANGALORE SANJAY KUMAR S/O LEHAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT36YEARS NO.145, 9TH MAIN3D CROSS, HIB COLONY BANGALORE ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri: S G BHAGAWAN, ADV. FOR R1 TO R4) CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(1)&(3) CR.P.C BY THE STATE P.P. FOR THE STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL DT.21.1.10 PASSED BY THE P.O. FTC-V, BANGALORE IN S.C.NO.7/0...
Thimmaiah Vs. The State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash complaint, fir and proceedings in crime No.80/2015 of Lokayuktha Police, Bangalore urban District vide Annex-A Complaint and Annex-B fir the record of which is acceded and pending before the special Judge, Prevention of corruption Act special Court, Multistoried building, Bangalore.) Pradeep D. Waingankar. J, 1. The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1 in Cr.No.80/2015 of Lokayukta police station, Bangalore Urban Division has filed this petition under Article 226 and 27 of the Constitution of India r/w 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings initiated against him in Cr.No.80/2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 409, 468, 471, 420 r/w 120-BIPC. 2. One Smt. Siddamma, the second respondent filed a private complaint dated 24.11.2015 before the Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta, Bangalore City. It ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »