Karnataka Court March 2016 Judgments
Dr. Digambareppa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Mar-22-2016
K.N. Phaneendra, J. 1. At the stage of admission itself, the matter is heard on merits. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader have submitted their arguments. 3. The present petition is filed seeking to quash the entire proceedings in C.C. No.4435/2014 pending on the file of Principal JMFC-II Court, Raichur, for the offences punishable under sections 22 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and for violation of Rules 22(4), 28(2), 29(1) and 29(5) of the Minimum Wages Rule, 1950. 4. The Labour Inspector, Second Circle, Raichur, has laid a charge-sheet against the petitioner by name, describing him as Vice Chancellor of University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, for the above said offences on the ground that on 12.3.2014 the Labour Inspector has visited the said University and found some violations of the provisions of Minimum Wages Act and Rules, that is to say University has not furnished Registers pertaining to the Annual Report and Registers i...
Tag this Judgment!C. Balakrishna Vs. C. Muniraju and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-22-2016
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Judgment and award dated 23-6-2009 passed in MVC No. 137/2004 on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, partly allowing the claim petition for Compensation and seeking enhancement of Compensation.) 1. The appellant, Mr. C. Balakrishna, is aggrieved by the award dated 23-6-2009, passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, whereby the learned Tribunal has exonerated the M/s. Cholamandalam General Insurance Company Limited, respondent No. 2, from its liability to pay the compensation to the appellant in M.V.C. No. 137 of 2004. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 26-1-2004 at about 7.30 a.m., the appellant was riding a motor cycle, bearing Registration No. KA-02 EH-1726, on the Bangalore-Sarjapura road. At the relevant time, a TVS Moped, bearing Registration No. KA-05 EN-254...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Deepak Apparels Pvt Ltd Vs. City Union Bank Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-22-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF MARCH, 2016 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER A N D THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.28182/2013 (GM-DRT) No.526, 6th Block, 2nd Phase, Banashankari III Stage, Bangalore 560 085, Rep. by its Managing Director Sri K. Kotrabasappa. BETWEEN:1. M/s. Deepak Apparels Pvt. Ltd., 2.3. Sri Kotrabasappa, S/o. G. Kotrappa, A/a:50. years, Managing Director of M/s. Deepak Apparels Pvt. Ltd. Smt. Kumari G.S., W/o. Kotrabasappa, A/a:43. years, Director of M/s. Deepak Apparels Pvt. Ltd. 2 Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are residing at No.526, 6th Block, 2nd Phase, Banashankari III Stage, Bangalore 560 085. PETITIONERS (By Sri R.L. Patil, Senior Adv. for Sri Ashish Krupakar, Adv.) AND:1. 2.3. City Union Bank Ltd., Having its registered office at: Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu and Branch office at No.82, 6th Cross, Malleshwaram, Bangalore 560 003. H.R. Var...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Pioneer Marketing Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-22-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22d DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION NO.15894 OF2016(T-RES) Between: M/s. Pioneer Marketing, Having its registered office at No.59/5, G-Block, Sahakaranagar, Bangalore 560 092. Represented by its Proprietor, Mr. Anilkumar Niranjanprasad. Petitioner (By Shri. S.S. Naganand, Sr.Counsel for Shri. S. Manjunatha, Adv.) And:1. 2. Office of the Commissioner of State of Karnataka, Vidhana Soudha, Vidhana Veedhi, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Bangalore 560 001. Represented by its Finance Commissioner. Commercial Taxes in Karnataka, V.T.K. Gandhinagar, Bangalore 560 009. 2 Represented by its Commissioner. Respondents (By Shri.S.V. Girikumar, AGA) --- This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated.22.02.2016 issued by the R-2 at Annexure A which states that Nutralite is to be classified as unscheduled goods under the provi...
Tag this Judgment!Balakrishna C Vs. C Muniraju
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-22-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6206 OF2009(MV) ... APPELLANT BETWEEN: C. BALAKRISHNA AGED42YEARS S/O R. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA RESIDING AT CHEMBENAHALLI SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK. AND:1. 2. (BY SRI N. GOPALA KRISHNA, ADV.) C. MUNIRAJU S/O. CHINNAPPA, MAJOR RESIDING AT SHANTHIPURA VILLAGE HUSKUR POST ANEKAL TALUK-562158. THE MANAGER M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED H. O: TIAM HOUSE, 5TH FLOOR NO.72, RAJAJI SALAI CHENNAI-600001.(T.N) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O. MAHESH, ADV. FOR R-2; NOTICE TO R-1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED283-2014) 2 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED236-2009 PASSED MVC NO.137/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AN...
Tag this Judgment!Bhaskar Industrial Development Limited Vs. South Western Railway Club ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: This MFA filed u/s. 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the order dated 29.08.2015 passed in A.S.No.1 of 2015 (Old No.148 of 2014) on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Dharwad, allowing IA No.II.) H.G. Ramesh, J. (Oral): 1. Whether Court has power under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to remit the matter to the arbitral tribunal after setting aside an arbitral award, is the question that requires determination in this appeal. The question is answered in the negative. 2. This appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act' for short) is directed against an order dated 29.08.2015 passed by the Court of the Principal District Judge, Dharwad, in Arbitration Suit No.1/2015. The appellant herein was the plaintiff before the trial Court in the aforesaid suit. The aforesaid suit (Application) was filed under Section 34 of the Act against an arbitral award dtd. 06.01.2014. By ...
Tag this Judgment!Hanumanthappa Vs. Central Bureau o Investigation, by its Superintenden ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: CRL.P filed U/S.438 CR.P.C by the Advocate for the Petitioner praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petr. on Bail in the event of his arrest in CR.NO.RC 27(A)/2015 of CBI/ACB/BLR P.S., Bengaluru District for the offence P/U/S 120(B) R/W 420, 468, 471 of IPC and Sec.13(2) R/W 13(1)(d) of P.C.ACT and Sec.66 of I.T. Act and etc.) 1. Petitioner in the main petition bearing Crl.P.1439/16 is the 4th accused and the petitioner in the connected petition, Crl.P.1629/16 is the 3rd accused respectively in RC.27(A)/2015, a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, I.P.C. and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 66 of the Information and Technology Act. Both of them are apprehending arrest at the hands of respondent-CBI and hence separate anticipatory bail applications have been filed on their behalf. 2. The respondent has filed detailed objections opposing both the applications. 3. He...
Tag this Judgment!Narasimha and Others Vs. S. Manoj Kumar and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 02.05.2015 passed by the 1ST Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangaluru IS O.S. No.102/2015 on I.A. III produced at Annexure-A.) This petition is filed by the petitioners-defendants requesting the Court to quash the order dated 02.05.2015 passed by the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore on I.A.No.3 in O.S.No.102/2015, which is produced at Annexure-A. 2. I.A.No.3 was filed on behalf of the petitioner-defendants before the Trial Court under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, praying that all further proceedings may be stayed and parties may be referred to arbitration for resolution of the dispute raised in the plaint. Said application is supported by the affidavit of the petitioner No.1 defendant No.1, wherein it is stated that petitioners-defendants were the partners of the firm by name K.N.S.B Palguni Textiles initially as per the partnership dated 29.03.200...
Tag this Judgment!Shakthi Vs. Balasubramanya and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
Rathnakala, J. 1. The appellant/claimant is aggrieved by the inadequate compensation awarded by the 6th Addl. Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore (SCCH-2) (for short, Tribunal ) in respect of the injuries suffered by him in the road traffic accident that occurred on 24-09-2010 at 7.30 a.m. 2. The claimant filed a claim petition under Section 166(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Tribunal, contending that on 24-09-2010 at 7.30 a.m. while he was standing on the side of Whitefield Main Road, near Manasa Driving School, a Lorry bearing registration No. KA-02/A-5688 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against him, resultantly, he fell down and sustained grievous injuries all over his body. Immediately, he was shifted to Bowring Hospital, for first aid treatment, thereafter, to Nimhans Hospital. From there, he was treated as inpatient at a private Hospital, Tamil Nadu. From the date of accident, intermittently he was in...
Tag this Judgment!Sandeepani Niketan Vs. N. Nanjappa and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to exercise its supervisory and extraordinary jurisdiction in so far as it relates to setting aside the order Annex-A dated 22.04.2015 in Ex-Petition No.2713/2012 whereby the by learned Judge illegally and arbitrarily rejected I.A.No.VI filed by the petitioner.) 1. This writ petition is preferred by Sandeepani Niketan Education Society being aggrieved by the order dated 22.4.2015 passed by the Executing Court in Execution Petition No.2713/2012 on I.A.No.6 produced as per Annexure A herein and also requested the Court to consequently direct the Court below to consider the objection filed by the petitioner in terms of Section 47 of CPC before issuance of delivery warrant. 2. Petitioner herein filed I.A.No.6 before the trial Court under Sections 94(e), 151 and order XXI Rule 97(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as amended r/w Rule 19(3) of the Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967, as amend...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »