Karnataka Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited and Ano ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
(Prayer: M.F.A. No.6015/2013 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 06-05-2013 passed in M.V.C. NO.6846/2010 on the file of the 16th Additional Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore City (SCCH-14), awarding a Compensation of Rs.15,79,000/- with Interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of this Petition till the date of Payment. M.F.A. No.7547/2013 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and award dated 06-05-2013 passed in M.V.C. NO.6846/2010 on the file of the XVI Additional Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore City (SCCH-14), partly allowing the claim Petition for Compensation and seeking enhancement of Compensation.) 1. Both these are appeals preferred assailing the judgment and award passed by the XVI Additional Judge, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal-14, Bangalore City, ('the Tribunal' for brevity) whereby the injured claimant is awarded a compensation of Rs.15,79,...
G.H. Prabhakara Vs. E. Narayanagowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
1. This appeal by the appellant-complainant is directed against the judgment arid order dated 6.11.2009 passed by the Fast Track Court-V, Madhugiri, in Crl.A.No.81/2008. 2. By the impugned judgment and order, the Appellate Court has set aside the conviction and sentence passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Division) and JMFC., Madhugiri in C.C.No.890/2006 and has acquitted the accused i.e., the respondent herein for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. Aggrieved by that, the appellant-complainant has filed this appeal. 4. Briefly stated the facts are: The appellant-complainant filed a private complaint for the offence punishable under section 138 of the N.I. Act. The case of the appellant-complainant was that he is a business man. He used to go to Tumakuru. At that time, the respondent-accused used to meet the appellant. They are good fnends. Thereafter, the respondent was transferred to Chilling Centre situated at Hindupura road, Madhugiri. Th...
Sri. Gajanan Ramachandra Velangi, Vs. Sri. Vijaya Irappa @ Chudamani U ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
-1- WA No.100191/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE1t DAY OF MARCH2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.A. No.100191 OF2015GM-ST/RN) R BETWEEN: SRI. GAJANAN RAMACHANDRA VELANGI AGE:47. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O No.148/B, BHUDHAWAR PETH TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. APPELLANT (BY SRI. F.V. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2.3. SRI. VIJAYA IRAPPA @ CHUDAMANI UNDRE AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O16421, ANASURKAR GALLI BELAGAVI, DIST.BELAGAVI. MISS. REKHA D/O IRAPPA CHUDAMANI UNDRE AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O16421, ANASURKAR GALLI BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI. MISS. PRAMILA D/O IRAPPA CHUDAMANI UNDRE AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O16421, ANASURKAR GALLI BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI. WA No.100191/2015 2 4.5. 6.7. 8.9. SHRI. NARAYAN S/O SIDRAI CHOUGALE AGE: MAJOR, OCC: CONTRACTOR R/O A/P MANNUR, BELAGAVI DIST. BELAGAVI. SHRI. JOTIBA S/O SIDRAI CHOUGALE AGE: MAJOR, OCC: CONTRACTOR R/O A/P MANNUR, BELAGAVI. DIST. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›