Karnataka Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Karnataka By Vs. Sri Kantharaj
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-04-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF MARCH, 2016 P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER A N D THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.508/2012 BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NYAMATHI POLICE STATION NYAMATHI, HONNALI TALUK (By Sri: P.M. NAWAZ, SPP) AND: SRI KANTHARAJ S/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA AGED28YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/O MACHAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT (By Sri: KARTHIK YADAV, ADV FOR SRI: S K VENKATA REDDY, ADV. ) ... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT2CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(1) & (3) OF CR.P.C BY THE STATE P.P. FOR THE STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DT.1/12/2011 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE IN S.C. No.37/2011 - ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S. 302 & 201 OF IPC. THIS CRL. APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, A.V. CHANDRASHEKARA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUD...
Puttaiah @ Mahesh Vs. State by Rural Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-04-2016
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL REVIEW PETITION NO.1317/2010 BETWEEN: PUTTAIAH @ MAHESH, S/O. D.N. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, R/O. JODI GUBBE, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (By SRI. RAVIKUMAR N. R. AND SRI. K. S. GANESH, ADVS.) AND: STATE BY RURAL POLICE, HASSAN, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-1. ... RESPONDENT (By SRI. RACHAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W401CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED2309.2010 PASSED BY THE P.O. AND ADDL. S.J.FTC, HASSAN IN CRL.A.28/07 AND JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF CONVICTION DATED0103.07 PASSED BY THE PRL. C.J.(JR.DN.) & JMFC., HASSAN IN - 2 - C.C.NO.122/02 AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OF THE RESPONDENT. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THIS CRL.RP IS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondent.2....
Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Narayan and ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
S. Sujatha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bidar. 2. Briefly stated the facts are : The deceased-Babanna aged about 6, met with an accident on 8-11-2013 and succumbed to the injuries sustained in the accident. The claimants being the parents of the deceased filed claim petition, claiming global compensation of Rs. 7,50,000/- with interest. The Tribunal after analysing the evidence placed on record, following the judgment of this Court in the case of Sagar (deceased) by LRs. v. Suresh in MFA No. 22068 of 2011, D/- 6-11-2013, awarded compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/-. Being aggrieved by the said award, the insurer is before this Court. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Insurer contends that the deceased was aged 6 years, the Tribunal ought to have considered the age of the younger parent to apply the multiplier, to compute the quantum of compensation. Awarding compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- is contrary to the pr...
State of Karnataka, Represented by Arakalgud Police Vs. B.D. Sandeepa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: This CRL.P filed U/S.439(2) CR.P.C by the S.P.P. for the stated Praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the Order Dated 23.04.2015 passed in CRL.MISC.PETR.No.324/2015 by the PRL. Sessions Judge, Hassan, Granting bail to the Respondent/Accused in CR.NO.315/2014 of Hassan Rural P.S., and Cancel the said Order of bail and permit the police to arrest and take the Respondents to Custody.) 1. The State of Karnataka represented by Arkalgud police station has filed this application under Section 439(2), Cr.P.C. requesting this court to cancel bail granted to the respondent-accused by the Principal Sessions Judge, Hassan, in Crl.Misc. No.324/15 on 23.4.2015. Respondent will be referred to as accused in view of his ranking before the sessions court. 2. The learned sessions judge has allowed the application filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C. and has chosen to grant bail to the accused. The facts leading to the filing of the application under Section 439(2), Cr.P.C. are ...
The Chairman, RGTI Ltd. Vs. Khasim Ali and Another
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ or order and quash the impugned order dated 27.11.2012 passed in Civil Misc. No.269/2010 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-II at Bidar, vide Annexure-G and all proceedings pursuant thereto. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order and quash the impugned order dated 28.09.2012 passed in Misc. Petition No.22/2010 by the Fast Track Court II at Bidar, vide Annexure-G and all proceedings pursuant thereto. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order and quash the impugned order dated 01.08.2012 in Misc. Petition No.207/2010 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge at Bidar vide ...
A.R. Basavarajappa Vs. Naramma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: RSA filed U/S. 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dt.29.6.2005, passed in R.A.No.126/2004 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I at Davanagere, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Judgment and Decree dt.4.11.1998 passed in OS.190/1997 on the file of the PRL. Civil Judge (JR.DN.), Davanagere.) 1. Divergent judgment passed by the learned judge of first appellate court in Fast Track Court-I, Davanagere, in R.A.126/04 is called in question. 2. The appellant was plaintiff in an original suit in O.S.197/97, a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction relating to 1.15 acres of land in Survey No.35/1 of Echagatta village, Mayakonda Hobli, Davanagere Taluk. His case is that he is in possession of the said land on the strength of a registered sale deed dated 28.8.1996 executed by the 6th defendant- Ekanthappa who had in turn purchased the same from Revanasiddappa, son of Revanna by means of a registered sale deed dated 10.1.1994. Since def...
M/s. ITC Infotech India Ltd. Vs. Venkataramana Uppada
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 17.03.2015 passed by the III Addl. Labour Court in I.D.No.6/2014 Vide Annexure-A and hold that I.D.6/2014 is barred by Limitation.) 1. In this Writ Petition, order dated 17.03.2015 passed in I.D.No.6/2014 by the Principal Labour Court, Bengaluru, Annexure-A is impugned. 2. A claim petition filed under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short `I.D.Act') came to be filed on 13.02.2014 by the respondent herein, questioning termination letter dated 11.02.2009 - Annexure-O. An interlocutory application under Section 11-A of the I.D. Act read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 151 CPC -Annexure-P came to be filed seeking for condonation of the delay of 730 days in filing the claim petition. Said application having been allowed by the impugned order has been called in question by the employer - Management in this writ petition. 3. H...
M/S Itc Infotech India Ltd Vs. Mr Venkataramana Uppada
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3d DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.27510/2015 (L-TER) BETWEEN: M/S ITC INFOTECH INDIA LTD., NO.18, PULIKESHINAGAR POST BANASAWADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER MS. REMADEVI THOTTAHIL (MAJOR) (BY SRI.KASTURI, SR.COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP KUMAR J, ADVOCATE) AND: ... PETITIONER MR. VENKATARAMANA UPPADA S/O LATE YELLAYYA REDDY AGED ABOUT46YEARS R/O No.18, 2ND CROSS, THINDLU POST, APC LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-560 097. (BY SRI VENKATARAMANA UPPADA- PARTY IN PERSON) ...RESPONDENT2THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED1703.2015 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. LABOUR COURT IN I.D.NO.6/2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND HOLD THAT I.D.6/2014 IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. THIS WRIT PETITION BEING HEARD AND RESERVED, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER In ...
The Chairman Rgti Ltd. Pipe Line Vs. Khasim Ali S/O Mastansab & Anr
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.103949/2013 C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.101106/2013, 84067/2012, 84068/2012, 84141/2012, 84142/2012, 87549/2012, 87597/2012, 87598/2012, 87599/2012, 102450/2013, 101226/2013, 102449/2013, 101107/2013, 101446/2013, 101228/2013, 101227/2013, 103961/2013, 103960/2013, 103959/2013, 103957/2013, 101216/2013, 101217/2013, 101218/2013, 101219/2013, 101220/2013, 101221/2013, 101222/2013, 101223/2013, 101224/2013, 101225/2013, 87043/2012, 102616/2013, 102617/2013, 102618/2013, 102619/2013, 102620/2013, 102621/2013, 102622/2013, 102623/2013, 102636/2013, 102637/2013, 102638/2013, 102639/2013, 102640/2013, 102774/2013, 102775/2013, 102776/2013, 102777/2013, 102778/2013, 102780/2013, 102781/2013, 102782/2013, 102783/2013, 102785/2013, 102786/2013, 102787/2013, 103946/2013, 103948/2013, 103952/2013, 103953/2013, 103958/2013, 103962/2013, 102788/2013, ...
Justice Subhash B. Adi Vs. The Secretary, Karnataka Legislative Assemb ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the communication bearing No.D.O.No.KLAS/Sec/Lok/31/2015-16 dated 03.12.2015 issued by the first respondent vide Annexure-'A' and etc.) 1. This case was listed today in the category of orders for dealing with five interlocutory applications, out of which, four have been filed the by the petitioner, and I.A.-4/2016, for impleadment, has been filed by Mr.K.V.Dhananjay, the learned counsel for petitioner. 2. But even before this court could deal with these interlocutory applications, Mr.Madhusudhan R. Naik, the learned Advocate General, has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the writ petition itself before this court. Therefore, before dealing with the interlocutory applications, with the consent of the learned counsel for parties, this court proceeds to deal with the preliminary objection raised by the Advocate General. 3. Mr.Madhusudhan R. Naik, the lear...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »