Karnataka Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagadev Biradar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-10-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the representation of the petitioner on the file of the respondents herein vide Annexure-E and to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 5.6.2015 vide Annexure-E and to release all the original documents of the vehicle in question and etc; This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation [Amendment] Act 2014 as unconstitutional, illegal and ultra vires and etc; This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Taxation Amendment Act 2014 vide Annexure-D unconstitutional, illegal and ultra vires and etc; This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare the Karnataka Motor Vehicle T...
Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-10-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH2016 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.38868-38870 OF2015(LA-UDA) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION Nos.38871-38874 OF2015(LA-UDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.35858 AND3588035881 OF2013(LA- BDA) WRIT PETITION No.82 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.26980-26982 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION No.83 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.15616-15620 OF2013(LA-UDA) WRIT PETITION No.40076 OF2014(LA-BDA) IN W.P. Nos.38868-38870 OF2015BETWEEN:1. 2. Smt. K.M.Chikkathayamma, Wife of D. Ramu, Aged about 58 years, Sri. R. Krishna, Son of D. Ramu, 2 Aged about 34 years, Smt. R. Hema, Daughter of D. Ramu, Aged about 32 years, Smt. Parimala, Daughter of D. Ramu, Aged about 26 years, Sri. R. Umesha, Son of D. Ramu, Aged about 29 years, Smt. T. Renuka, Wife of Late D. Papanna, Aged about 44 years, T. Preethi, Daughter of Late D. Papanna, Aged about 23 years, 3.4. 5.6. 7.8. 9.10. P. Sunil, P. Kiran, Son of Late D. Papann...
Sri Jagadev Biradar Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-10-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH2016BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.28063 OF2015(T-MVT) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION No.594 OF2015(T-MVT) WRIT PETITION No.22682 OF2015(T-MVT) WRIT PETITION No.26102 OF2015(T-MVT) IN W.P.No.28063/2015 BETWEEN: Sri. Jagadev Biradar, Son of Madivalappa, Aged about 53 years, Resident of S.R.No.2/2/2/6, Building No.A, PINNACLE TAHE WOODS, Flat No.501, Wakad, Pune 411 027, Maharastra State. Also at: H.No.124, M.R.Riches Garden, NRI Layout, Phase-2, Near Jubilee College, 2 Kalkere, Bengaluru 560 043. PETITIONER State of Karnataka, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha, Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru 560 001. (By Shri Keshav R Agnihotri, Advocate) AND:1. 2.3. The Commissioner, Transport and Road Safety, I Floor, A Block, TTMC Building, Shanthi Nagar, Wilson Garden, Bengaluru 560 027. The Regional Transport Office (RTO), Represented by the Inspector of Motor Vehicles (IMV), Old...
R. Ravi @ Ulsoor Ravi Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.03.2011, vide Annexure-A, passed by the R-3 and consequently to direct the R-3 and R-4 to delete the name of this petitioner in the rowdy list maintained by R4, Ulsoor Police Station, Bengaluru.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 25.03.2011 passed by respondent No.3 at Annexure-A and is consequently seeking that the respondents No.3 and 4 be directed to delete the name of the petitioner in the rowdy list maintained by respondent No.4 Police station. 2. The petitioner claims to be a M.A. Graduate and is employed after his education and is also carrying on independent business. According to the petitioner, through he was not involved in any criminal activities, he was wrongly implicated on the crime registered which was ultimately considered in S.C.No.471/2003. The judgment passed in the said case dated 30.05.2013 is referred to a...
Ramakrishna Vs. Revanna and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
Rathnakala, J. 1. The appellant/claimant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 6-9-2014 passed in MVC No. 445/2010 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge and Additional MACT, Hassan (for short, Tribunal ) whereby the Tribunal dismissed his claim petition filed under Section 166 of MV Act with cost of Rs. 5,000/-. This is the second round of litigation between the parties before this Court. 2. The case of the appellant/claimant before the Tribunal was, on 17-11-2009, while he was walking on the left side of Shravanur-Mandagere Road, at that time, the driver of the Tractor-Trailer bearing registration No. KA-11-T-3780/3781 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against him; resultantly, he sustained multiple grievous injuries; he was shifted to Mangala Hospital, Hassan where he was treated as inpatient for five days. He had spent more than Rs. 50,000/- for his treatment. Hence, he filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs. 20,00,000/- with interest at th...
Lalitha @ Basamma Vs. Siddaramappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
Rathnakala, J. 1. The appellant/wife is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21-8-2014 in M.C.No. 2/2014 on the file of the Judge Family Court, Davangere, whereby petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act', is dismissed. 2. Succinctly stated, the wife filed the petition for divorce before the Court below; her case was, the parties were married as per Hindu customs on 21-12-1997. They lived happily together for there months only. The husband was alcoholic, used to harass the wife physically and mentally. On his divorced, her parents gave him dowry amount to see that their daughter pulls on in the marital home, but ill-treatment and harassment of the husband persisted on the wife. They are blessed with two children, one male and one female from the marriage. He suspected the fidelity of his wife and ultimately drove her from the matrimonial home on 10-8-2012. He is not amenable to any advise by the elders. He has not l...
G.V. Beeranna Vs. Yeshodamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: This RFA is filed under S.96 read with order 41 Rule (1) of CPC, against the Judgment and decree dated 27.08.2014 passed in O.S. No. 244/2012 on the File of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, JMFC, Kolar itinerating at Mulbagal, partly decreed the suit for partition and separate possession.This RFA coming on for orders this day, the Court delivered the following:)1. This appeal by a defendant is directed against the preliminary decree for partition and separate possession passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Mulbagal. Suit filed by the first respondent has been decreed in part. The plaintiff and defendant Nos. 2 to 4 have been held as entitled for 1/4th share each, in item Nos. 1 to 16 of plaint A schedule property and the plaint B schedule items. Plaintiff has been held entitled to recover mesne profits, under Order XX Rule 12 CPC, from the date of suit till recovery of her share from defendant No. 4. Claim made for share by partition in respect of items Nos. 17 and 18 of plaint A...
E. Thimmappa and Another Vs. Roopa Thimmappa and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: This CRL.RP filed U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C by the Advocate for the Petitioner praying that this hon'ble Court may be pleased to modify the Judgment passed by the Crl.Misc.No.36/11 dated: 14.6.11 on the file of the MMTC-IV, Bangalore and in Crl.A.No.330/13 dated:15.6.13 on the file of the P.O., FTC-XII, Bangalore and consequently be pleased to allow the Petn. filed U/S 12 of Protection from Domestic Violence Act 2005 and Residency order to the petr. and her son.) Common Order: 1. The petitioner in the main petition, i.e. Crl.R.P.619/14, Thimmappa is the legally wedded husband of Smt.Roopa, the petitioner in the connected petition. The first wife of the Thimmappa is dead, and Roopa is a divorced lady. The marital relation of Roopa was dissolved by means of a decree of divorce passed in M.C.1001/07 dated 13.3.2008. Thimmappa had married one Girija in the year 2002 and she died because of certain ailments, leaving behind one child aged 1 years. Thereafter Thimmappa married Roopa and...
Sri G v Beeranna Vs. Smt Yeshodamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.228/2015 BETWEEN: SRI G.V. BEERANNA W/O. LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT57YEARS, R/AT C/O. DINNAHALLI SEENAPPA, DOOR NO.6783, BYRESHWARA PRASANNA NILAYA, THYAGARAJA COLONY, MULBAGAL TOWN, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131, KOLAR DISTRICT. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI K. VENKATA REDDY, ADV.-. ABSENT) AND:1. SMT. YESHODAMMA W/O. SRI MUNISWAMY D/O. LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, R/AT H.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK-563 131, KOLAR DISTRICT. 2 SMT. SONNAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT80YEARS, R/AT H.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK 563 131 KOLAR DISTRICT. SMT. PADMAMMA W/O. LATE NARAYANA GOWDA, D/O. LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT67YEARS, R/AT NO.174, 9TH CROSS ROAD, 12TH MAIN ROAD, KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE-570 008. SMT. V. PARVATHAMMA W/O. SRI P.M...
H N Ramachandra Vs. State of Karnataka by Police Inspector, Rajajinaga ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-08-2016
(Prayer: This Crl.RP filed U/S. 397 Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the Petitioner praying that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 26.11.09 passed in CRL. A. NO. 281/2004 on the file of the Addl. S.J. and P.O., FTC-IV, Bangalore city and acquit the Petr., from the charges levelled against the Petr.)1. The present petition is filed under Sections 397, Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of conviction passed by the IV Additional CMM in C.C. 542/99 and affirmation of the same by the learned Sessions Judge and presiding officer of fast Track Court-IV in Crl.A 281/04.2. Petitioner herein was the first accused in the said case. There were three more accused apart from him. The 2nd accused Purushottam died during the pendency of the case soon after filing the charge sheet. The 3rd accused Anantharamu is acquitted in the said case. The case against 4th accused Anthony Rao is split up.3. Charge sheet is filed against all the accused for the offences punishable unde...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »