Court : Karnataka
(MFA filed U/O 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC against the order dated 05.02.2015 dismissing I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 in O.S. No.994/2012 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru.) Oral: Order regarding maintainability of a common appeal presented under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against a common order passed on several interlocutory applications in a suit or in a Regular Appeal: 1. Registry has raised an objection as to maintainability of this common appeal on the ground that a single appeal presented against a common order dated 05.02.2015 passed by the trial court in exercise of the power under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.994/2012 is not maintainable. According to the Registry, separate appeals will have to be presented against the order relating to each of the interlocutory applications though the order is common. 2. In my opinion, a common appeal presented under Order XLIII Rule l(r) of CPC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NO.112519/2014 (LR) BETWEEN NARAYAN NAGAPPA NAIK SINCE DECEASED BY LRS.1. 2.3.4. SHAKUNTALA NAIK W/O LATE NARAYAN NAIK AGE:64. YEARS. RAJVARDAN NAIK S/O LATE NARAYAN NAIK AGE:38. YEARS. ANANDAVARDAN NAIK S/O LATE NARAYAN NAIK AGE:37. YEARS. ISHWARAYYA NAIK S/O LATE NARAYAN NAIK AGE:34. YEARS. ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS AND R/O.HINDU COLONY, "TIMMOVVA HOUSE" BHATKAL, TQ: BHATKAL UTTAR KANNADA DIST ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.V.YAJI, ADV. FOR SRI. NARAYAN V YAJI, ADV.) :2. : AND1 2.3. STATE OF KARNATAKA , R/B ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU LAND TRIBUNAL, BHATKAL BY ITS SECRETARY, BEEVIMAIMUNNA SINCE DECEASED BY LR. 3(A) ABDULGANI S/O JAINULLA BIDDENHUSAIN AGE: ABOUT43YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. GUDAGARGALLI, MAIN ROAD, SUSAGADI, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA (BY SMT K.VIDYAVATI, AGA FOR R1 & R2) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1433 OF2015BETWEEN: AHAMED @ MUDASSIR, S/O. LATE ABDUL RASHEED, AGED ABOUT30YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.65/2B, 10TH CROSS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, MYSURU CITY- 570 001. PETITIONER THE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER, MYSURU CITY 570 010. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, NARASIMHARAJA POLICE STATION, MYSURU CITY 570007. (BY SRI.A.S.KULKARNI, ADV.) AND:1. 2.3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NARASIMHARAJA SUB-DIVISION, MYSURU CITY 570 007. (BY SRI.RACHAIAH, HCGP) RESPONDENTS2THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION397R/W401CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE EXTERNMENT ORDER DATED1612.2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 U/S55A) OF KARNATAKA POLICE ACT IN MAG(2) NO.275/2015-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C by the Advocate for the petitioner praying to set aside the externment order dated 16.12.2015 passed by the respondent No.l u/s 55(a) of Karnataka Police Act in MAG(2) No.275/2015-16 vide Annexure-B.) Heard the learned counsel Sri. A.S. Kulkarni, representing the petitioner and Sri. Rachaiah, learned HCGP representing the respondent. 2. Present petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C challenging the order dated 16.12.2015 passed by the Special Executive Magistrate and Deputy Police Commissioner, Mysuru, against this petitioner under Section 55-A of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. By virtue of the order dated 16.12.2015 petitioner is directed externed from the limits of Mysuru city for a period of six months from 16.12.2015. Facts leading to the filing of this present petition are as follows: Petitioner is a permanent resident of Rajendra Nagar, Mysuru city. He is married and has one school going fe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5330/2015 BETWEEN: SHANKARE GOWDA @ SHANKARA S/O KALLE GOWDA AGED34YEARS R/A SOREKAPURA NUGGEHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATTANA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573 131. (BY SRI S.CHETAN NAG, ADV.) AND:1. STATE BY MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU 560 001. PETITIONER2 R.A.H.SIGURAN DE FACTO COMPLAINANT C/O JUSTICE AND CARE GPO POST OFFICE, PB NO.5502, NEAR VIDHAN SOUDHA POLICE THIMMAIAH CIRCLE DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHETAN DESAI, HCGP FOR R1; SMT.JWALA POULSE, ADV. FOR R2) - 2 - THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 OF ITP ACT, 1956 AND SEC.366A, 372 R/W34OF IPC IN S.C. NO.219/2013 ON ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.303/2010 BETWEEN: Manu, S/o. Siddaramu, Aged about 23 years, R/at Chikkamandya, Mandya Taluk. ...APPELLANT (By Sri A.H. Bhagavan & Sri A.N. Radhakrishna, Advs.) AND: State by Mandya Rural Police, Represented by S.P.P., High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri B. Visweswaraiah, HCGP) This Crl.A. is filed under S.374(2) Cr.P.C. r/w S.11(2) of P.O. Act, praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 30.11.2009 and 16.02.2010 passed by the Prl. Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.75/2008 (counter case SC462008), convicting the respondent - accused No.3 2 therein / appellant herein, for the offence punishable under S.324 of IPC. This Crl.A. coming on for hearing this day, the Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT The appellant was tried along with his parents, for the offences punishable under Ss.341, 324, 307 read wi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA ITA Nos.750 and 758-759/2009 BETWEEN M/s Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Bangalore. .Appellant (By Sri.V.K. Gurunathan, Advocate For Sri.S. Parthasarathi.) AND The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-tax (TDS) Circle 16(2), Bangalore. Respondent (By Sri.K.V. Aravind, Advocate ) These Appeals are filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 to set aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore in ITA Nos.1449 to 1451/BNG/2008, dated 03.07.2009, in the interest of justice and equity 2 These Appeals having been heard and reserved for orders on 25th January 2016, coming on for pronouncement of Judgment this day, S. Sujatha J., made the following. JUDGMENT These appeals are filed by the assessee challenging the common order dated 03.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Bangalore (Tribunal for short...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 - - M.F.A.No.292/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF FEBRUARY2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.292/2016 (CPC) R BETWEEN: SRI MADHAVA PRABHU S/O SRINIVASA PRABHU HINDU AGED74YEARS RESIDING AT HOSOOR VILLAGE KARJE 576 215 UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT APPELLANT (BY SRI S.KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI SUBHAS SHETTY S/O MODLUTHAVU GOPALA SHETTY HINDU AGED55YEARS KONTHYAL HOSOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 576 201 2. SRI H.RAGHURAM SHETTY S/O HALGERI DODAMMA NANJAMMA SHEDTHI HINDU AGED60YEARS11H ULLOOR VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TALUK AND UDUPI DISTRICT 576 201 RESPONDENTS MFA FILED UNDER ORDER43RULE1r) R/W SECTION106OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0512.2015 PASSED ON I.A.NO.5 FILED BY THE APPELLANT UNDER ORDER39RULES1AND2OF CPC IN RA NO.43/2015 AND GRANT TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM CUTTING THE TREES OR HAVING SURVEY CONDUCTED IN THE SUIT PROPERTY TILL DISPOSAL OF RA NO.43/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE02n d DAY OF FEBRUARY2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATI L WRIT PETITION No.61555 of 2011 [GM-KEB]. C/w. WRIT PETITION No.84387 of 2013 [GM-KEB]. In WP No.61555/2011: BETWEEN: M/S CHANNAGIRI CEMENTS PVT. LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI.RAHUL RACHAPPA KULLOLLI, AGE:25. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: UTTUR - 587313, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. (By Sri.J.S.SHETTY ADV.) AND:1. HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO.LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, P B ROAD, NAVANAGAR-580025, HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD.2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HESCOM, MUDHOL SUB DIVISION, MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT. ... PETITIONER (By Sri. SHIVARAJ P MUDHOL ADV.) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (I) CALL :2. : FOR RECORDS (II) QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED:02/02/2011 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K. In WP No.84387/2013: BETWEEN: M/S. CHANNAGIRI CEMENTS PRIVATE LTD....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 - - M.F.A.No.1239/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF FEBRUARY2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1239/2015 (CPC) R BETWEEN: ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT51YEARS S/O LATE RAMARAJU R/AT NO.32, 8TH MAIN BEML LAYOUT, 5TH STAGE RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE 560 039 APPELLANT (BY SRI ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI M.S.RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI R. RAMU AGED ABOUT58YEARS S/O LATE RAMARAJU11H CROSS, PADARAYANAPURA BANGALORE 560 026 2.3. SRI R.JAGANNATH AGED ABOUT66YEARS S/O LATE RAMARAJU R/AT NO.10, ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BANGALORE 560 085 SRI R. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT54YEARS S/O LATE RAMARAJU R/AT NO.10, ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BANGALORE 560 085 4. SRI VARADARAJ NAIK AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O LATE G.R.NAIK R/AT NO.6, K.R.ROAD BANGALORE 560 004 2 - - M.F.A.No.1239/2015 RESPONDENTS MFA FILED U/O43RULE1d) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED3001.2014 PASSED ON M...
Tag this Judgment!