Karnataka Court December 2016 Judgments
The State of Karnataka represented by the Principal Secretary to Govt. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
(Prayer: These STRP s are filed under Sec.65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act., against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2015 passed in STA Nos. 1057 to 1061/2014 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal District Judge Member, Commercial Taxes Member, Bengaluru, allowing the appeal filed under Sec.63 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act.) Jayant Patel, J. I.A.No. 1/2016 is filed seeking condonation of delay of 22 days. Since the delay is only for 22 days, we could have taken a lenient view of the matter, but considering facts and circumstances, we find it appropriate to consider the merits of the petitions. 2. The present petitions are directed against the order dated 30.09.2015 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal for the sake of convenience), whereby the Tribunal for the reasons recorded in the order has allowed the claim of the assessee in capacity of a purchaser dealer for extending the benefit of input tax credit. 3. ...
Tag this Judgment!T.J. Abraham Vs. Ashok Kheny
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
(Prayer: The Election Petition is filed under Section 81 read with Sections 100(1) (A) (D) (I) and (IV), 33 (4) and (5), 33-A 36, 5(C) and 9-A of the Representation of People's Act, 1951 and Articles 9 and 173 of the Constitution of India, by one Sri.Abraham T.J., Petitioner: Candidate (Party-in-Person), challenging of Election of the Respondent, Sri.Ashok Kheny to the Karnataka Legislature From no.49, Bidar (South) assembly constituency, General Elections held in the Year 2013, praying to Adjudge and declare that the contest of Sri.Ashok Kheny, Respondent, is illegal and to thereby set aside his Election as being illegal, Void and of no effect and etc.) 1. This Election Petition is filed by one of the defeated candidates under Section 81 read with Section 100(1)(a)(d) and (iv), 33(4) and (5) 33-A, 36, 5(c) and 9-A of the Representation of Peoples Act,1951 and Articles 9 and 173 of the Constitution of India. 2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that election relates to 49-Bidar So...
Tag this Judgment!smt.shashikala Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF DECEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.100756/2016 BETWEEN:1. 2. SMT.SHASHIKALA ANNASAHEB JOLLE, W/O SRI.ANNASAHEB JOLLE, AGE:47. YEARS, OCC: MLA OF NIPPANI, R/O: EXAMBA, CHIKODI TQ., BELAGAVI DIST. SMT.THARA @ THARA ANURADHA AGE:44. YEARS, OCC: MLC, R/O:"CHIGURU", 278, 15TH CROSS, 5TH PHASE, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560078. (BY SRI : J.BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONERS AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (THROUGH SADALAGA PS) REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAJA RAGHAVENDRA NAIK, HCGP) 2 THE PROCEEDINGS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE COMPLAINT REGISTERED AND IN C.C. NO.350/2015 (CR. NO.88/2014) ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKODI AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDG...
Tag this Judgment!Korangrapady Co-operative Agricultural Society Ltd. By its Chief Execu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Clause No.2 (vi) of the notification Dated 8.11.2016 issued by the R-1 Vide Annexure -A in so far as the Petitioners are concerned and direct the DCCBs/Nationalized/Commercial Banks under the control of R-2 to compensate the petitioners by granting suitable rate of interest for retaining their huge funds in Current Accounts restricting cash withdrawals based on needs and etc.) 1. The petitioners are all the agricultural/fishermen/ multipurpose/credit co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. They have filed these petitions seeking the redressal of their grievances over the cap on the withdrawal of the amounts fixed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 pursuant to the scheme of demonetization, as per the notification, dated 8.11.2016 (Annexure-A). 2. Prof.Ravivarma Kumar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Mahesh R. Uppin fo...
Tag this Judgment!The Divisional Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Deput ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
(Prayers: This MFA filed U/Sec. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and award dated: 28.08.2014, passed in MVC.No.1937/2012, on the file of the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member, Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Belgaum, awarding Compensation of Rs.6,73,000/- along with interest rate the rate of 6% P.A. from the date of petition till realization. This MFA Crob in MFA No.100380/2015 filed under Order XLI Rule 22 of CPC, 1908, against the Judgment and award dated 28.08.2014, passed in MVC No.1937/2012 on the file of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge and Member, Additional Mact, Belagavi, partly allowing the claim petition for Compensation and seeking enhancement of Compensation.) 1. The Insurer is in appeal whereas the claimant has filed the cross-objection challenging the judgment and award dated 28.08.2014 passed by the 1st Addl. Senior Civil Judge and Addl. MACT, Belgaum in MVC No.1937/2012. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and pe...
Tag this Judgment!Vijayashreepura Kshemabivrudhi Sangha (Okkoota) Regd., Represented by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to a call upon the R-1 and 2 to place before this Hon'ble Court the original records of (I) Memorandum of Agreement dated 5.10.1949 signed between Government of Mysore and his Highness Jayachamaraj Wadeyar, the late Maharaja of Mysore and (ii) list of immovable properties held by his highness the Maharaja of Mysore as private property as on 26.1.1950 (Annexure-C) it does not show Sy.No.1 of Vijayashreepura, Mysore-570 005) for this Hon'ble High Court's scrutiny and verification as to whether the Land in Sy.No.1 of Vijayashreepura, Mysore acquired vide Annexure-A dated 14.11.1899 and Annexure-A1 dated 12.7.1900 acquired for Government work is state property. These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct R-1 and R-2 not to treat the petitioners as "Encroachers on land in Sy No.1 of Vijayashreepura, Mysore" whose dwelling houses have been regulari...
Tag this Judgment!The Union of India Vs. Sri. Thoushif
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P S DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.37241/2016 (S-CAT) BETWEEN:1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, KESHAVAPURA, HUBLI-560020, DHARWAD DISTRICT KARNATAKA THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER OFFICE OF DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER, BANGALORE DIVISION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, NEAR BANGALORE CITY RAILWAYS STATION, BANGALORE-560023 KARNATAKA (BY SRI.ABHINAY Y T, ADVOCATE) 2. ...PETITIONERS2AND: SRI. THOUSHIF SON OF LATE ABDUL AZIZ, AGED ABOUT29YEARS, RESIDING AT MUDDULINGANAHALLI JANATHA COLONY, MANNE POST, TYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA BENGALURU DISTRICT-560020 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI.GANAPATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED1612.2015 PASSED IN O.A.NO.170/00765/2015 BY THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE A...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. Udaykumar S/O Basappa Neglur
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 6th day of December, 2016 R Present THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN And THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR W.A. Nos.31169-31180/2013 (GM-RES) Between: - Appellant National Highways Authority of India Project Implementation Unit, Sattur Colony, Vidyagiri, Dharwad, Represented by its Manager (TECH) and Competent Authority for Land Acquisition Sri Ch Ramanjva Rao of Dharwad. (By Sri Sachin S Magadum, Advocate) And:1. 2.3. Udaykumar s/o Basappa Neglur, Age:50. yrs, Occ.: Agriculture, R/o Kavalettu village, Tal.: Ranebennur & Others. Sri Shankar s/o Basappa Neglur, Age:50. yrs, Occ.: Agriculture, R/o Kavalettu village, Tal.: Ranebennur & Others. Hanumantappa Siddalingappa Kyatammannavar, Age:50. yrs, Occ.: Agriculture, R/o Kavalettu village, Tal.: Ranebennur & Others. 2 4.5. 6.7. 8.9. Basavaraj Channappa Negalur, Age: Major, Occ.: Agriculture, R/o Kavalettu village, Tal.: Ranebennur & Others. Mahadevappa s...
Tag this Judgment!Korangrapady Co-Operative Agricultural Society Ltd Vs. Union of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI W.P.NOS.61428 61432 OF2016[GM-RES]. & W.P.NOS.61548-61552/2016 C/W W.P.NOS.61433-61437/2016 & 61553-61557/2016, 61438-61442/2016 & 61518-61522/2016 & 61566/2016, 61449-61453/2016 & 61506-61510/2016, 61280-61284/2016 & 61511-61515/2016, 61285- 61289/2016 & 61543-61547/2016, 61443-61447/2016 & 61533-61537/2016 AND6145461458/2016 & 6152561529/2016. WP NOS. 61428- 61432/2016 & WP NOS.61548-61552/2016 BETWEEN1 KORANGRAPADY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY LTD HEAD OFFICE:No.76, BADAGUBETTU, KUKKIKATTE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 101 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UPPOOR AGRICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD P.O. THENKABETTU, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 105 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.2.3. PADUBIDRI CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY LTD NEAR BUSTAND, PADUBIDRI - 574 111 2 UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.4. GANAPATHI CO-OPERA...
Tag this Judgment!M John Phillips Vs. The Commissioner Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Pali ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-05-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to consider the representation given by the petitioner vide Annexures-E, F and G dated 18.04.2016 pass appropriate orders.) 1. The prayers in the writ petition are quoted below; "a) Issue a writ of mandamus to consider the representation given by the petitioner vide Anneuxres-E, F and G dated 18.04.2016 pass appropriate orders. b) Pass any other writ, order direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Recently, this Court in the case of V Dhamodaran and others versus Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and others in WP Nos.3880-3881/2014 decided on 28.11.2016 has held that these type of writ petitions are not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are quoted below for ready reference; "5. Upon a preliminary hearing of ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »