Karnataka Court December 2016 Judgments
Basappa Vs. IndraGouda and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal appeal is filed under section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the Judgment dated 30.04.2011 passed by the fast Track Court-II Koppal in S.C.No.97 of 2010, by allowing the appeal in the interest of justice. This appeal coming on for final Hearing this Day, j. Ravi Malimath delivered the following.) 1. The case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 is the husband of the deceased; accused No.2 is the brother-in-law, accused No.3 is the father-in-law and accused No.4 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. Accused No.5 is the maternal uncle of accused No.1 and accused No.6 is the sister-in-law of the deceased. A complaint was lodged by the father of the deceased on 8th July 2010 at about 12.45pm. He has stated that the deceased Smt. Shobha was his second daughter. She was given in marriage to accused No.1 on 8th May 2008. Cash and gold was given at the time of marriage. They have a female child. Thereafter, the husband of the parents starte...
Tag this Judgment!Saurodeep Bhattacharjee and Others Vs. The Registrar (Evaluation), Raj ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the valuation Methodology adopted by Respondent (Second Valuer) in granting zero to the petitioner in the subjects Anatomy 1 and 2 the relevant portions marked herewith as Annex-N and P respectively in Questions 14, 13 and 19 respectively. In the I MBBS Examination conducted by the Rajeev Ghandhi University of Health Sciences during the June 2016, as Arbitrary, Unscientific and Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and etd.,.)1. All these writ petitions are similar in nature and therefore they are disposed of by this common order. 2. The petitioners in these writ petitions are pursuing their studies either in MBBS or BDS courses. They have taken up examination and are failed one or two subjects. Some of the petitioners have failed with little margin of marks say 1 or 2 marks. They are aggrieved by the method of evaluation adopted by the respondent on the ground of ...
Tag this Judgment!Mallikarjuna and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its State ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to call for the records in S.C.No.153 of 2011 on the file of the Fast Track Court-I, Bellary, peruse the same, allow the appeal and set aside the Judgment, Order of conviction dated 12.04.2012 and sentence dated 13.04.2012 and set the appellants at liberty in the interest of justice.) Ravi Malimath J. 1. The case of the prosecution is that accused No.1 is the husband of the deceased Smt. Usha and accused No.2 is the mother of accused No.1. That on 07.05.2011, the deceased along with her husband had visited Roopanagudi to attend a marriage of their relative. On 08.05.2011, they returned back to Bellary at about 10.00 a.m. Thereafter, the accused picked up a quarrel with the deceased. At about 11.00 a.m, with an intention to kill her they suspected her fidelity and both of them poured kerosene on her and accused No.1 lit the fire. As a result, the deceased sustained grievous burn injuries. She ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri K Manohara Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF DECEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P S DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.37411/2016 (S-KAT) C/W W.P.Nos.32876/2016, 33242/2016, 33791/2016, 33793/2016 & 33795/2016 IN W.P.No.37411/2016: BETWEEN: SRI K MANOHARA S/O SRI ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT63YEARS, INTERNAL AUDITOR, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE, SIRUGUPPA, BALLARI DISTRICT R/AT APMC QUARTERS, SIRUGUPPA-583 221 BALLARI DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI P.N.NANJA REDDY, ADV.) 2 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, 6TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 THE DIRECTOR AGRICULTURAL MARKETING DEPARTMENT, NO.16, 2ND RAJBHAVAN ROAD, P.B. NO.5309, BENGALURU-560 001 ... RESPONDENTS AND:1. 2. (BY SRI D.NAGARAJ, AGA.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED2904.2016 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA STATE A...
Tag this Judgment!Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF DECEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. WRIT PETITION No.8895/2015 (LB-RES-PIL) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.10349-351/2015 (LB-PIL), WRIT PETITION Nos.14141-142/2015 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.15183/2015 (GM-RES), AND WRIT PETITION No.24579/2015 (PIL) IN WRIT PETITION No.8895/2015 Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development 204, Rayville Apartments Lower Bender Mangalore-2 Represented by its Joint Co-Ordinator Ms. VidyaDinker. ... PETITIONER (By Smt Jayna Kothari, Adv.) 2 Urban Development Department Vikasa Soudha Bangalore-560 001 Represented by its Principal Secretary AND :1. The State of Karnataka VidhanSoudha-560 001 Represented by its Chief Secretary.2. The State Government of Karnataka 3. The Directorate of Town Planning 4. Mangalore City Corporation 5. Mangalore Urban Development Authority M.S. Building Phase-IV Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi Ban...
Tag this Judgment!Vedpraksh Power Private Limited, Rep. by its Director Zonun Pari Vs. P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-10-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash and canceling the impugned tender dated 19.8.2016 (being Annexure - A) issued by the R1 and declaring the response/impugned order dated 14.9.2016 (being Annexure - E) of the R1 as not in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner has called into question the tender issued by the respondent No.1 for the supply of power contending that certain terms and conditions of the tender are arbitrary and discriminatory. It has also sought a writ that the first respondent's order, dated 14.9.2016 (Annexure-E) on the petitioner's representation seeking clarifications is not legal. The petitioner, who claims to be a prospective bidder, sought interim stay of the impugned tender process. On 26.9.2016, this Court turned down the petitioner's request for the grant of interim stay. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed W.A.No.3869/2016. The Division Bench, by its order, dated 6.10.2016 direct...
Tag this Judgment!Shantavva Vs. Anand S/O Virupakshappa Ballari
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE09H DAY OF DECEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR MFA No.101018/2015 (MV) BETWEEN1 2. SHANTAVVA W/O LATE GADIGEPPA AWARI @ ELIVAL, AGE:43. YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, VEERBHADRAPPA S/O GADIGEPPA AWARI @ ELIVAL AGE:17. YEARS9MONTHS, OCC: STUDENT, SINCE APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER AS GUARDIAN i.e., APPELLANT NO.1, BOTH ARE R/O: NOOLVI, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. ... APPELLANTS (By Sri. HARISH S MAIGUR & K H MULLA, ADVS.) AND1 ANAND S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA BALLARI AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: A/P SASARAWAD, TQ: SIRHATTI, DIST: GADAG.2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER SRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., E-8, RIICO, INDUSTRIAL AREA, 2 SITAPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302022. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri. ASHOK T KATTIMANI, ADV. FOR R1) THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED0403.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.439/2013 ON THE FI...
Tag this Judgment!Madeppa @ Shivalingappa @ Madiwalappa Vs. Madiwalappa S/O Basappa Sube ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA C.R.P.No.100098/2016 BETWEEN:1. 2.3. SRI MADEPPA @ SHIVALINGAPPA @ MADIWALAPPA, S/O VEERBHADRAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:80 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, SRI GURUSIDDAPPA MALLAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:56 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, SRI BASAPPA MALLAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:53 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O: TURAKARSHIGIHALLI, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.S.H.MITTALKOD FOR SRI V.M.SHEELAVANT, ADV.) AND:1. 2.3. SRI MADIWALAPPA S/O BASAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:68 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, SRI SOMAPPA S/O BASAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:60 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, SRI BABU S/O BASAPPA SUBEDAR, AGE:65 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O: TURAKARSHIGIHALLI, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI. .. RESPONDENTS :2. : THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED1909.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.54/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KITTUR, REJECTING IA N...
Tag this Judgment!Iranna S/O Mallappa Baliger, Vs. The State of Karnataka,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KARNA TAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED TH IS THE8T H DAY OF DECEMBE R2016 BEFORE THE HONBL E MR . JUS TI CE S.N . SA TYANARAYANA CRL .P.NO .101 410/2 016 BE TWE EN : IRANNA S/O MALLAPPA BAL IGER , AGE:24. YEARS , OCC: AGRICUL TU RE , R/O: BENAKAL , TQ: YALBURGA, DIST: KOPPAL-5832 32 . (BY SRI RAJASHEKHAR B HALL I , ADVOCA TE .) ... PE TI TION ER AND THE S TA TE OF KAR NA TAKA, REPR ESEN TED BY TH E STA TE PUBL IC PROSECU TOR , THROUGH NAREGAL POLIC E S TA TION, TQ: RON, DIS T: GADAG. (BY SRI P RAVEE N K . UPPAR , HCGP .) ... RESPONDEN T THIS CR IMINAL PETI TIO N IS F ILED UNDER SEC TION438OF CR .P .C., SE EK ING TO A LLOW THE PE TI TION DI REC TING TH E RESPONDEN T TO REL EASE THE PE TI TIONER ON BAIL IN THE E VEN T OF H IS ARRES T IN NAREGAL POLIC E S TA TION C RIME NO.118 OF RON , DIS TRICT: GADAG, REGIS TE RED FOR THE OFFENC ES PUN ISHABLE2016, TA LUKA:2. UNDER SEC TION21OF M.M.R.D . AC T, 195 7 AND UNDER SEC TION379OF IPC, E TC.,. THIS PE TI TION COMING ON FOR ORDER...
Tag this Judgment!RNS Infrastructure Limited, Reptd. by Its Managing Director, Naveen R ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Order passed by R-1 under Sec. 245D(4) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 Dated 27.05.2016 and 11.08.2016 in Annex-A1 and A2 as without jurisdiction and barred by limitation; quash the order passed by R-3 giving effect to the orders of the R-1 and consequent notice of demand issued under Sec. 156 of the act by R-3 Dated 20.06.2016 in respect of Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2012-13 at Annex-A3 to A9; quash the orders of penalty under Sec. 271(1)(C) of the act and the consequent demand notice issued under Sec. 156 of the Act by R-3 Dated 20.06.2016 in respect of assessment years 2006-07 TO 2011-12 AT ANNEX-A10 TO A15; quash all consequential proceedings initiated by the R-2 and 3 in Relation to recovery of amount, treating the petitioner as willful Defaulter and Initiation of Prosecution Proceedings etc.) 1. These petitions are filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »