Karnataka Court November 2016 Judgments
shri.aditya Vs. shri.vasudev
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA R.S.A.No.100698/2016 (VAC. POSSN. & MES. PRO.) BETWEEN: SHRI.ADITYA A/F LATE SATYAPRASAD MISHRA, AGE:28. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O:188. A, LINE BAZAR, DHARWAD-580001. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.MURUGENDRA TUBAKE AND SRI NAVEEN R.MELINAMENI, ADV.) AND:1. SHRI.VASUDEV S/O RAMACHANDRA PUJAR, AGE:48. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: OPPOSITE RAJANI APARTMENT, SANMATI NAGAR, DHARWAD-580002.2. SHRI.MUKESH S/O HARIJIVANDAS PATADIA, AGE:53. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: ADARSHA NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580023. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.GANGADHAR J.M. AND SRI PRAVEEN TARIKAR, ADV. FOR C/R1 AND R2) THIS RSA IS FILED U/SEC.100 R/W ORDER42RULE1OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:29.04.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.187/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD:28.05.2012, PASSED...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Shankarappa Vs. Karnataka Power Transmission
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
1 WP No.23485/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF NOVEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA WRIT PETITION NO.23485/2015 (GM-KLA) R BETWEEN: SRI SHANKARAPPA S/O LATE SHIVAMURTHAPPA AGE:53. YEARS, OCC: SHIFT OPERATOR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M R S (MAIN RECEIVING STATION) KPTCL, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA PRESENTLY R/ AT MRS COLONY QUARTERS NO.26, VIDYANAGAR SHIVAMOGGA 577 201 (BY SRI P.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR M/S RAVI B.NAIK ASSOCIATES) AND:1. ...PETITIONER KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, KAVERI BHAVAN K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR ADMN AND HRD KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR ...RESPONDENTS2 (BY SRI SUSHEN.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI HARIKRISHNA S. HOLLA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI G.DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2) 2 WP No.23485/2015 WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri T. Venkatesh Vs. M/S. Bangalore Turf Club Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF NOVEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P S DINESH KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NOS.1643-1650/2015 & 1952/2015(L-TER) C/W WRIT APPEAL NO.2438/2015(L-TER) WRIT APPEAL NOS.296-303/2016 & IN W.A.NOS.1643-1650/2015 & 1952/2015 BETWEEN:1. SRI T. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT57YEARS, NO.146, SRINIVAS NILAYA, NEAR I.N.SCHOOL, SRI RAMANAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 079. 2.T.DAMODARAN SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS a). SMT.UDAYA KUMARI W/O LATE T.DAMODHARAN, 2 AGED ABOUT55YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, NARAYANAPPA STREET OIL MILL ROAD, THOMAS TOWN, BANGALORE-560 084. b). SARAVANA KUMAR S/O LATE T.DAMODHARAN, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, NARAYANAPPA STREET, OIL MILL ROAD, THOMAS TOWN, BANGALORE-560 084. c). NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE T.DAMODHARAN, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, NARAYANAPPA STREET, OIL MILL ROAD, THOMAS TOWN, BANGALORE-560 084. d). PADMANABHAN S/O LATE T.DAMODHARAN, AGED ...
Tag this Judgment!Dora Babu Vs. C.V. Jagadish and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the impugned ORDER DATED 13.09.2016 passed by the XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in O.S.No.4663/2010 on I.A.NO.7 vide Annexure-A.) 1. Though the writ petition is listed for preliminary hearing, with the consent of learned counsel on both sides, it is heard finally. 2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.4663/2010. That suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,94,626/- with interest at the rate of 21% p.a. from the date of the suit till realization. In response to the said plaint, the respondents herein who are the defendants in the suit filed their written statement seeking a counter claim to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/- on the alleged breach of the contractual agreement dated 08.03.2007. No written statement to the counter claim was filed by the plaintiff. Thereafter, the suit was set down for trial. On 05.08.2016, I.A.No.7 was ...
Tag this Judgment!Eramallappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, By Malleshwaram Police, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.37/2016 of Malleshwaram P.S., Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 115, 23 of Karnataka Education Act, Sections 418, 420, 381 of IPC and Section 3 of Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act. This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.37/2016 of Malleshwaram P.S., Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 115, 23 of Karnataka Education Act Sections 418, 420, 381, 120B, 118 of IPC and Section 3 of Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act. This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.37/2016 of Malleshwaram P.S., Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 115 and 23 Karnataka Education Act and Section 418, 420 and 381 of IPC. This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of t...
Tag this Judgment!M/s.3F Industries Ltd., (earlier known as M/s. Foods Fats and Fertilis ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
(This STA is filed under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the order dated 15.04.2015 passed in Order No.AR.CLR.CR.52/2012-13 on the file of the Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings, Bengaluru, clarifying that the vegetable fat spread is an unscheduled commodity and exigible to tax at the rate of 14.5% under Sec.4 (b)(iii) of the KVAT Act, 2003.) Jayant Patel, J. 1. The appellant-assessee has preferred the present appeal by raising three questions of law, but, in our view the question really arises for consideration can be formulated as under:- Whether the product of the petitioner as vegetable fat spread can be said as included in Entry No. 32 of the III Schedule or not?" If the answer is negative it will necessarily fall in the residuary category. If the answer is in the affirmative it would fall under Entry 31 for chargeability of tax. 2. The present appeal is directed against the decision of the Advance Ruling Authority whereby the Advanc...
Tag this Judgment!M/S 3f Industries Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23d DAY OF NOVEMBER2016PRESENT R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR STA No.15/2015 Between: M/s.3F Industries Ltd., (earlier known as M/s.Foods Fats and Fertilisers Limited) No.46/5,(Old No.46/B), Behind Govardhan Theatre Yeshwanthpur Bengaluru-560 022. Represented by its Vice President(Co-Ordination), Sri.A.K.S. Moorthy Aged about 67 years, S/o.late Sri.A.C. Krishnaswamy Iyer. (By Sri.G. Rabinathan, Advocate) And:1. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar, Bengaluru-560 009. 2.Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings, Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar, Bengaluru-560 009. (Sri.T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA) Respondents Appellant 2 This STA is filed under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the order dated 15.04.2015 passed in Order No.AR.CLR.CR.52/2012-13 on the file of the Authority for Clarification and ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. Dora Babu Vs. Sri. C. V. Jagadish
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION No.55351/2016 (GM-CPC) PETITIONER BETWEEN: SRI. DORA BABU S/O V.DORASWAMY AGED ABOUT42YEARS R/O NO.22, CHOWDAPPA COCONUT GARDEN, HOSAKERAHALLI BANASHANKARI III STAGE BANGALORE 560 085. (BY SRI. SHIVARUDRAPPA SHETKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. (BY SRI.RAVISHA M.G., ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 & R-2) BOTH RESIDING AT NO.12/1 OLD NO.316, 12TH A MAIN6H BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE 560 010. SRI.C.V.JAGADISH S/O LATE C.L.VENKATA RAO AGED ABOUT54YEARS. SMT.SARITHA JAGADISH W/O C.V.JAGADISH AGED ABOUT50YEARS. RESPONDENTS2THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED1309.2016 PASSED BY THE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.4663/2010 ON I.A.NO.7 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though th...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Pachamma Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23d DAY OF NOVEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.19354 OF2014(GM-RES) BETWEEN: Smt.Pachamma, W/o.Late Shri Chinnappa, Aged about 68 years, Having her permanent residence At No.254, Indira Harijana Seva Sangha, New Byappanahalli, Indiranagar, Bangalore 560038. Presently residing at P87(Hut), Krishnappa Garden, Behind BEML, Nagvarpalya Post, C.V.Raman Nagar, Bangalore 560 093. Petitioner (By Sri Clifton DRozario, Advocate) AND:1. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore 560 001. 2 Station House Officer, Byappanahalli Police Station, Byappanahalli, Bangalore 560 038.2. 3.4. Karnataka Slum Development Commissioner of Police, Bangalore City, Infantry Road, Bangalore 560 001. Board, represented by its Commissioner, Risaldar Street, Seshadripuram, Bangalore 560 020.5. Shri S.Karunakaran, S/o.Late Shri M.S.Srinivas, Residing at No.285, 2nd Cross,...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Y. Bhaskar Rao Vs. State of Karnataka, Through Special Investigati ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to quash the prosecution sanction order dated 20.7.2016 vide Annexure-K issued by his Excellency Governor of Karnataka; quash the order taking cognizance dated 10.8.2016 at Annexure-J, passed by LXXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bangalore and consequently quash the additional charge sheet dated 3.8.2016 at Annexure-C submitted by the first respondent on the file of LXXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bangalore.) 1. The petitioner in this case is arraigned as accused no.7, along with six others, for offences punishable under Sections 8,9 and 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'PC Act', for brevity) and Sections 119, 120(B), 201, 202,217,385,419 read with Section 36 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »