Karnataka Court November 2016 Judgments
Sri v Dhamodaran Vs. Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
1/19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 28th day of November, 2016 Before THE HONBLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Writ Petition Nos.3881-3883/2014 (LB-BMP) Between 1. Sri. V. Dhamodaran Aged about 32 years S/o Sri. N. Venugopal No.224/8, B.R.S. Residential Building Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore 560035.2.3. Sri. K. Srinivasa Reddy Aged about 31 years S/o Sri. Krishna Reddy R/at. No.405, Rudrappacharya Vatara Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore 560035. Sri. S.M. Shivakumar Aged about 26 years S/o Sri. Maheshwaraiah No.224/8, B.R.S. Residential Building Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore-560035. (By Mr. S.R. Krishna Kumar, for Mr. Shrikara P.K. Advocate) And 1. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Corporation Buildings, N.R. Square Bangalore 560 002. Represented by its Commissioner.2. The Assistant Director of Town Planning ... Petitioners Date of Order 28-11-2016 W.P.Nos.3881-3883/2014 Sri. V. Dhamodaran & others Vs. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and others 2/19 Mahadevapura Zone...
Tag this Judgment!Vishwas Concrete Products Private Limited Vs. Bangalore Electricity Su ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28h DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WP No.44405/2016 c/w WP No.15128/2016(GM-KEB) In WP No.44405/2016 BETWEEN ...PETITIONER VISHWAS CONCRETE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED OFFICE AT #80/85, 3RD MAIN ROAD NEW THARAGUPET BANGALORE 560 002. (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR B.R.VISHWAS) (BY SRI A.V.AMARANATHAN, ADVOCATE) AND1 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(EL.,) BESCOM, C8 SUB DIVISION SAHAKAR NAGAR BANGALORE 560 011. (REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER) BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD CORPORATE OFFICE K.R.CIRCLE BANGALORE 560 001. (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR) (BY SRI PAVAN SAGAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) ...RESPONDENTS Date of order :28. 11.2016 in WP No.44405/2016 c/w WP No.15128/2016(GM-KEB) Vishwas Concrete Products Private Limited Vs. Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd & another 2/16 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226...
Tag this Judgment!L. Jagadish Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Food) and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
(Prayer: In view of the order dated 19.02.2015 passed by a learned single judge of this Court referring the question stated therein for the opinion of a division Bench, the question is referred to this division bench.) H.G. Ramesh, J. 1. A learned Single Judge of this Court has referred the following question of law for the opinion of a Division Bench; hence, the matter is placed before this Division Bench. Whether the claim of an adopted son for transfer of authorisation to run fair price shop on compassionate grounds is tenable? The aforesaid question may be recast as follows: Whether the word son referred to in the proviso to Clause 13 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Control Order, 1992 includes an adopted son ? 2. The reference was made because of divergent opinions rendered by two learned Single Judges of this Court in Sri Shivakumar vs. The Deputy Commissioner [WP No.8879/2013 (D.D.07.11.2013)], and in S.Balakrishna Reddy vs. The Hon ble...
Tag this Judgment!C.N. Dinesh Malavaiah and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented b ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the file in Cr.No.509/2012 of the Respondent Police for the offence P/U/S 498(A), 506 R/W 34 of IPC and same is pending before the IV ACMM, Bangalore, vide Annexure-A.) 1. Though this matter is listed for admission today, but with the consent of both sides it is taken up for final disposal. 2. This petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the proceedings registered in FIR No.509/2012 of respondent No.1 Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 468, 477A, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC, which is now pending before the IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Benglauru, produced as per Annexure-A. 3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that one Nagendra, The Secretary, Indiranagar Club, Bengaluru, i.e., respondent No.2 herein, filed the complaint before respondent No.1-Police. It is mentioned in the petition that ev...
Tag this Judgment!K.N. Kiran Kumar and Others Vs. State By Mandya Rural Police, Rep. by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C praying to set aside the Order Dated 05.12.2012 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.114/08 - convicting the Appellant/Accused for the offence punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 341, 302 and 307 r/w 149 of IPC. and etc., This Crl.A. is filed u/s.374(2) Cr.P.C praying to set aside the Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence Dated 05.12.2012 passed by the Addl. Dist. and S.J., Mandya in S.C.No.114/2008 convicting the Appellants/Accused for the offences P/U/SS 143, 147, 148, 341, 302 and 307 r/w Sec.149 of IPC and 27 of Indian Arms Act. and etc., This Criminal Appeal is filed u/s.374(2) Cr.P.C praying to set aside the Judgment and Order of conviction and Sentence Dated 05.12.2012 passed by the Addl. Dist. and S.J., Mandya in S.C.No.114/2008 - convicting the Appellants/Accused for the offences P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 302 and 307 r/w Sec.149 of IPC and u/s 27 of Indian Arms...
Tag this Judgment!K N Kiran Kumar Vs. State by Mandya Rural
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
Crl.A.1402/2012 C/W -1- Crl.A.Nos.52/2013 & 108/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1402/2012 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.52/2013 & 108/2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1402/2012 BETWEEN: K N KIRAN KUMAR S/O LATE NAGARAJU, 32 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, KILARA VILLAGE, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 450. (BY SRI C N RAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE BY MANDYA RURAL POLICE REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 560 001 RESPONDENT (BY SRI P M NAWAZ, SPP-1) APPELLANT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0512.2012 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA IN S.C.NO.114/08 - CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE Crl.A.1402/2012 C/W -2- Crl.A.Nos.52/2013 & 108/2013 PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION143 147, 148, 341, 302 AND307R/W149OF IPC. AND ETC., ******* IN CRIMIN...
Tag this Judgment!L Jagadish Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Food)
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
W.P.No.1008/2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF NOVEMBER2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH R AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRIT PETITION NO.1008/2015 (GM-PDS) ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: L.JAGADISH ADOPTED SON OF KRISHNOJI RAO AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/O LINGAPURA VILLAGE HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 577 001 (BY SRI H.C.SHIVARAMU & SRI H.R.HARSHAKUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATES) AND:1. 2. (BY SRI A.G.SHIVANNA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONG WITH SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA) THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (FOOD) DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE 577 001 THE TAHSILDAR HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 577 001 ... RESPONDENTS IN VIEW OF THE ORDER DATED1902.2015 PASSED BY A LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT REFERRING THE QUESTION STATED THEREIN FOR THE OPINION OF A DIVISION BENCH, THE QUESTION IS REFERRED TO THIS DIVISION BENCH. UPON HEARING ON THE QUESTION REFERRED, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: W.P.No.1008/2015 -2- ORDER H.G.RA...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary and Others Vs. H.B. Munivenk ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
(Prayer: This regular second appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2008 passed in R.A.No.38/2004 on the file of the II Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.1.1995 passed in O.S.No.394/1993 on the file of the Addl. Second Munsiff, Bangalore.) 1. This is a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated December 17, 2008, passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) II Court at Bengaluru (Rural) District in Regular Appeal No.38 of 2004, affirming the judgment and decree dated January, 24, 1995, passed by the learned Munsiff, Second Additional Court at Bengaluru Rural District in Original Suit No.394 of 1993. 2. The said suit was instituted, inter alia, for declaration that the suit property at survey No.15(old) / 54(new) measuring about 11 acres and 20 guntas at Pattandur Agrahara Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore South ...
Tag this Judgment!Shankarappa Vs. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Repr ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the recommendation dated 16.01.2015 (Annexure-K) passed by the Upa-Lokayukta and the show cause notice dated 15.05.2015 (Annexure-L) issued by Respondent No.1.) H.G. Ramesh, J. (Oral): 1. The following questions fall for determination in this case: (i) Whether Upa-lokayukta can disagree with the findings of an inquiry officer recorded in a disciplinary inquiry? (ii) What is the procedure to be followed by a Disciplinary Authority, if it disagrees with the findings of an inquiry officer and/or the recommendation of Upa-lokayukta? (iii) Whether the decision of this Court in The KPTCL vs. Javarai Gowda and Anr. [ILR 2015 KAR 1615] is per incuriam? 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is challenging the recommendation dated 16.01.2015 (Annexure-K) made by Upa-lokayukta as per Regulation 14(A)(d) of the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees' (Classification, Disciplinary, Control and App...
Tag this Judgment!T. Venkatesh and Others Vs. M/s. Bangalore Turf Club Ltd., Represented ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
(These Writ Appeals are filed U/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.28534- 28542/2010 dated 20/04/2015. These Writ Appeals filed U/S 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act Praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ Petition No.28534- 28542/2010 C/W W.P.No. 1492-1500/2011 Dated 20/04/2015.) Jayant Patel J. 1. As both the group of matters arise from the common judgment and the order passed by the learned Single Judge, they are being considered simultaneously. 2. We may record that W.A.Nos. 1643-1650/2015 and 1952/2015 are preferred by the workmen (hereinafter referred to as the workmen for the sake of convenience) against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 20.04.2015 in their respective writ petitions, whereby the learned Single Judge for the reasons recorded has dismissed the petitions. Whereas W.A.Nos.2438/2015 and allied matters have been preferred by the employer/Management against the order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »