Karnataka Court October 2016 Judgments
Sri Praveen Kumar Vs. Mangalore City Corporation
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 Before THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION NO.51117 OF2016(LB-RES) BETWEEN SRI.PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O NARAYANA NAMBIAR AGED ABOUT49YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3-13-1196 MAROLI KAIKAMBA KULSHEKAR P.O., MANGALORE 575 005. PETITIONER (BY SRI.UDAYA PRAKASH M., ADV.) AND1 MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION2 MANGALORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT LALBAGH MANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 575 008. AUTHORITY URWA, MANGALORE 575 008 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. RESPONDENTS Date of Order 24.10.2016 in WP No.51117/2016 Sri.Praveen Kumar Vs Mangalore City Corporation 2/8 WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO INITIATE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE ERSON NAMED VIDE.., REPRESENTATIONS AT ANNEXURES-E, F & G DATED1406.2016, 21.07.2016 RESPECTIVELY WITHIN THE TIME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT. HEARNG THIS DAY, COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THE PET...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Karnataka, Represented by its secretary to Government and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records and to quash the Annexure-A dated 16.09.2015 passed by the Hon ble Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in Application No.7376/2010.) Jayant Patel, J. 1. Rule. Mr.Ranganath S. Jois for Sri. Aravind H. appears for the respondents and waives notice of the petitions. 2. As all petitions arise from the similar orders passed by the Tribunal, they have been considered simultaneously and with the consent of learned Advocate appearing for both sides, they are taken up for final disposal. 3. Writ petition Nos.40643/2016 and 42245/2016 are directed against the order dated 16th September 2015 passed by the Tribunal in Application Nos.3223- 3224/2010 and whereas, the Writ petition No.44096/2016 and Writ petition No.40642/2016 are directed against the order dated 16th September 2015 passed by the Tribunal in Application No.5987/2010 and Application No.7376/2010 respectively. 4....
Tag this Judgment!D. Siddayya and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka Department of Rural ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the 6th respondent to vacate the office of the Adhyaksha, Zilla Panchayat, Ballari and to quash the proceedings dated: 29.04.2016 declaring the 6th respondent as Adhyaksha Of Zilla Panchayat, Ballari, vide Annexure-H.) 1. Petitioners in this writ petition have prayed for : a) a writ of quo warrantoand to direct 6th respondent to vacate the office of Adhyaksha, Zilla Panchayat, Ballari; b) to quash proceedings dated 29.4.2016 declaring 6th respondent s election as Adhyaksha; and c) to quash the CasteCertificate dated 26.4.2016 (Annexure-G). 2. Petitioners claim to be residents of Ballari. Their grievance is that 6th respondent obtained a false caste certificate and got elected to the post of Adhyaksha, ZillaPanchayat, Ballari, which is reserved for a candidate belonging to Backward Class II-B Category. 3. Heard Shri S.M.Chandrashekar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Sm...
Tag this Judgment!H.V. Rajanna and Others Vs. Additional Registrar of Co-Operative Socie ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 1-2-2016 on I.A.No.1 passed by Respondent No.1 produced as Annexure-A and etc.) 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 1-2-2016, passed by the learned Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, whereby the learned Additional Registrar has vacated the stay granted by him to the petitioners. The petitioners are equally aggrieved by the order dated 10-6-2016, passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed the petitioners' revision petition, and has confirmed the order dated 1-2-2016 passed by the learned Additional Registrar. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners claim to be members of the Karnataka State Judicial Department Multipurpose Co-operative Society. According to them, this Society was formed in 1938. The Society has permanent office in the premises of the H...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Gayathri Projects Ltd., Rep. By its Accounts Manager B. Subbaraju ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to: A) Declare that the impugned notices issued u/s.45 of the Karnataka value added Tax Act, 2003, dated: 12.08.2016 for Rs.47,01,840/- of the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit 1), Davanagere towards arrears of tax, penalty and interest payable for the periods of 2005-2006 and (II) the impugned notice under Section 45 of the Karnataka value Added Tax Act, 2003, dated: 12.08.2016 for Rs. 10,50,25,796/- by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit 1), Davanagere being arrears of tax, penalty and interest payable for the periods of 2006-2007 and (III) The impugned notice issued under Section 9 of the Tax on the entry of Goods Act, 1979 dated: 12.08.2016 for Rs.2,12,76,976/- being the arrears of Tax, penalty and interest payable for the year 2006-2007 as intimated by the Respondent No.2, the Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Khairatabad, Hyderabad in his letter dated: 16.08....
Tag this Judgment!The State Vs. Mohammed Ghouse
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21t DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR Writ Petition Nos.40643/2016 and 42245/2016 C/W Writ Petition No.44096/2016 and Writ Petition No.40642/2016 (S-KAT) In W.P.Nos.40643/2016 & 42245/2016: Between:1. 2. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary to Government, DPAR Services-2, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru. The Additional Regional Commissioner, (Revenue matters and others) Office of the Regional Commissioner, Mysore Division, Mysore. Petitioners (By Sri.H.T.Narendra Prasad, AGA) And:1. Mohammed Ghouse, 2 S/o Late Mohammed Ibrahim, Aged 64 years, Retired KAS officer, R/at No.19/2, 3rd Cross, Kauser Nagar, R.T.Nagar Post, Bengaluru-560 032. D.Radhakrishna, S/o. M.S.Doreswamy Iyengar, Aged 65 years, Retied Shirestedar, No.1047/17A, 2nd Main, 6th Cross, Vidyaranyapuram, Mysore-570 008. Respondents 2. (By Sri.Ranganatha.S.Jois for Sri.Aravind.H., Advocat...
Tag this Judgment!D Siddayya S/O Thimmappa Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R Dated this the 21 s t day of October, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR Writ Pe tition No.106417/2016 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:1. D SIDDAYYA S/O THIMMAPPA AGE:61. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O NO.38, ASHRAYA COLONY, MOKA BALLARI TQ, BALLARI DIST-583 117 2.3.4. RAGHVENDRA S/O LATE VENKATESHWARA AGE:32. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O NO.13/6, OLD MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, BALLARI- 583 101 ASUNDI B. NAGARAJGOWDA S/O B. SIDDANGOWDA, AGE:45. YEARS OCC: BUSINESS, R/O NO.2, ESHWAR TEMPLE ASUNDI VILLAGE, BALLARI TQ BALLARI-583 101 SATISH REDDY S/O SHIVARAM REDDY AGE:27. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O HARIJAN KERE, NEAR BALLARI ROAD KOLLAGALLU, BALLARI-583 101 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.M. CHANDRASHEKHAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE) :2. : AND:1. 2.3.4. 5.6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, M. S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STATE ELEC...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Gayathri Projects Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
:1. : IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KARNA TAKA DHARWAD BENCH Da ted th is the 2 1 s t d ay of Oc tober, 2016 BEFORE R THE HONBL E MR.JUS TICE P .S.DI NESH KUMAR WR IT PET IT IONS No.106 815 -1068 17/20 16 (T -RES) BE TWEEN : M/s. GAYA THRI PROJ EC TS L TD., I-FLOOR No .2, WARD No.1 6 SRI TEJALAKSHMI DEVI COMPL EX RAGHAVENDRA TALKI ES ROAD TALUKA BALLARI, DIS TRIC T: BALLARI REP . BY I TS ACCOUN TS MANAGER SHRI B . SUBBARAJU S/O NARAYANA RAJU AGE:44. YEARS , RES : BALLARI ... PE TI TION ER (BY SRI NARAYAN G . RASALKAR, ADV.,) AND:1. 2. THE DEPU TY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDI T-1) VANIJY E THERIGE BHAVAN D.DEVARAJ URS LAY OU T A BLOCIK, DAVANAGERE THE SEN IOR MANAGER BANK OF BA RODA KHAIRATABAD B RANCH61-84, SEC RE TARI A T ROAD KHAIRATABAD HYDERABAD 500 004 ... RESPONDEN TS (BY SRI M KUMAR, AGA., FOR R1) THESE WRI T P E TITI ONS ARE F IL ED UNDER AR TICLES226AND227OF THE CONS TI TU TION OF INDIA , PRAYING TO: A) DECLARE THAT THE IMPUGNED NOTICES ISSUED U/S.45 OF THE KARNA TAKA VALUE...
Tag this Judgment!Francis Xavier Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the sale notice dated 25.5.2016 published in the newspaper on 26.5.2016 as at Annexure 'A' to the petition. 2. In spite of certain financial assistance obtained by the petitioner from the respondent - Bank, the respondent - bank, the respondent had treated the same as Non-performing asset (NPA) and thereafter had initiated action under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner at that point, when a sale notice was published as at Annexure 'A' has approached this Court assailing the same. In the petition, the petitioner also referred to One Time Settlement which was sought to be availed by the petitioner. Be that as it may when the petitioner was before this Court, this Court at the first instance had granted the interim order. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent would submit that in view of the same sale has not taken place. Though the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Counsel for the respondent have filed a memo bef...
Tag this Judgment!Rukmini and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
Vineet Kothari, J. 1. The petitioners, 11 in number, are in the second round of litigation before this Court after the earlier in the case of Smt. Rukmini and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others W.P. Nos. 27925 to 27938 of 2016, dated 8-7-2016 came to be disposed of by this Court on 8-7-2016 directing the Chief Officer of the respondent-Belur Town Municipality to consider the representation of the petitioners in respect of their shops given on lease by the respondent-Municipal Council and decide the same in accordance with law. 2. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the aforesaid order are quoted below for ready reference: "3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners, this Court of the opinion that the impugned notices were issued only on 20-4-2016 taking due process of law under the aforesaid Act and the petitioners ought to nave responded to the same with whatever objections they have. 4. In the circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of as premature with a direction to the ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »