Karnataka Court October 2016 Judgments
GCL Private Limited (Formerly Known As GCL India Private Limited), Pee ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the letter Dtd.30.12.2013 marked as Annex-e and the letter dtd.11.8.2014 marked as Annex-h issued by the R-2 by issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash clause 22 of the registered lease-cum-sale Agreement Dtd.25.2.2010 marked as Annex-C by issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari as it confers unguided, arbitrary and unilateral power on R-2. This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, with a prayer to quash the impugned letter dated 6.9.2014 vide Ann-N passed by the R-4 as arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and article 14 of the constitution of india and direct the R-3 to execute the sale deed of the land in plot no. 265-p and 266-p of Narasapura industrial area, kolar district in terms of clause 6 of the allotment condition imposed in allotment letter dated 29.2.2012 and in terms of the order dated 16.6...
Tag this Judgment!N. Rajanna Vs. Dr. Rajaneesh Goel, I.A.S. Principal Secretary Departme ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
(Prayer: This CCC is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the contempt of courts Act 1971, by the complainant, praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/accused and punish them in accordance with law for having disobeyed the order of this Hon ble Court dated 11.01.2016 passed in writ petition No.22179/2014 (Annexure-A). Oral: H.G. Ramesh, J. 1. If no time limit is fixed for compliance of the order, whether action for contempt of court is maintainable in law? This is the short question for consideration in this case. The question is answered in the negative. 2. The case of the complainant is that the order dated 11.01.2016 made in W.P.No.22179/2014 is disobeyed. Hence, he has sought for initiating action against the accused for contempt of court. Operative portion of the order, whose disobedience is complained of herein, reads as follows: Accordingly, we pass the following order: (i) (ii) Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the request of the petitioner for re...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Y. Manjunath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. These petitions are heard and disposed of by this common order, as the petitions are filed challenging the same proceedings. 2. The facts are stated to be as follows. The petitioner in the first of these petitions was said to be working as the Deputy Commissioner of Excise, arrayed as accused 8 and the petitioner in the second of these petitions was said to be working as an Inspector of Excise and in-charge Additional Deputy Superintendent of Excise, Mysore, arrayed as accused 4. 3. It transpires that the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta, Mysore, on receiving information of certain corrupt practices in the Office of the Inspector of Excise, Range I and IV, Mysore, is said to have obtained a search warrant from the Court of the District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, to conduct a search of the said offices. Accordingly, he is said to have proceeded with his staff and other panch witnesses to the Office premises of the Deputy Superintendent...
Tag this Judgment!Sri N Rajanna Vs. Dr. Rajaneesh Goel
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
1 - - CCC No.925/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF OCTOBER2016PRESENT R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CCC No.925/2016 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: SRI N.RAJANNA S/O LATE NARASIHMAIAH AGED ABOUT56YEARS WORKING AS ASSISTANT MASTER GOVERNMENT SPORTS HIGH SCHOOL VIDYANAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE 560 078 ... COMPLAINANT DR. RAJANEESH GOEL, I.A.S AMENDED PRINCIPAL SECRETARY V/C/O DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES DATED AND SPORTS, M.S.BUILDING0310.2016 BANGALORE 560 001 (BY SRI M.S.BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. SRI ANUPAMA AGARWAL, I.P.S DELETED DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF V/C/O DATED YOUTH SERVICES AND SPORTS2208.2016 ... ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS11& 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT1971 BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER OF THIS2- - CCC No.925/2016 HONBLE COURT DATED1101.2016 PASSE...
Tag this Judgment!M. Muniyappa Vs. Kempamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of india Praying to set aside the Order Dated 23.09.2016 Passed by The Learned Sr. Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli in O.S.853/2008 on I.A.31 Vide Annexure-A;). 1. This is 3rd defendant's writ petition against the order dated 23.09.2016 made in O.S.No.853/2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, rejecting I.A.No.31 filed under Order IX Rule 7 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The Respondent Nos.1 and 2/ plaintiffs filed suit in O.S.No.853/2008, for partition and separate possession of 2/5th share in the suit schedule property; declaration that the partition dated 04.12.1990 between deceased Munihanumantharayappa and his sons, defendants 1 to 3, is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; declaration that the Will dated 16.02.1991 and 19.02.1991 said to be executed by late Munihanumantharayappa in favour of defendants 4 and 5, as forged, fabricated by defendants...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shoukath and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) of M.V.Act against the Judgment and Award Dated 15.10.2010 passed in MVC No.19/2007 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and Jmfc, Mact, Chinthamani, awarding a Compensation of Rs. 63,000/- with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit.) 1. This appeal is by the Insurance company challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chintamani, ['Tribunal', for short] in MVC No. 19/2007. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that the 1st respondent, aged about 12 years at the time of the accident instituted a claim petition represented by his natural guardian-mother contending that the 1st respondent and his father were waiting for a bus at Vyjakur gate on 18.10.2006 at about 10.30 a.m., at that point of time, an Auto rickshaw bearing No.KA-07/T- 5708 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against him causing grievous injuries. The appellant resisted the claim. The Tribunal after e...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Baba Developers Pvt. Ltd., Rep. By P. Sasi Bhushan Vs. The State ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Demand Notice under the heading of immediate action Dated 21.9.2016 passed by R-7 vide annex-P and the Order Dated 8.9.2016 vide letter Dated 15.9.2016 passed by R-3 vide Annex-Q.) 1. The petitioner-company has approached this Court by way of present writ petition with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ quashing the demand notice under the heading of IMMEDIATE ACTION dated 21.9.2016 passed by the 7th respondent vide Annexure 'P' and the order dated 08.09.2016 vide Letter No.C.R/216/17/555 15.09.216 passed by the 3rd respondent vide Annexure-'Q'. (ii) Issue a Writ or any other nature of Writ or order or direction as deem fit to meet the ends of justice. (iii) Pass such other order or orders and grant such other relief in favour of the Petitioner as deem fit in the circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity". 2. The l...
Tag this Judgment!Praveen Kumar Vs. Mangalore City Corporation, Represented by its Commi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the Respondents to initiate legal action against the person named vide.., representations at Annexures-E, F and G Dated 14.06.2016, 21.07.2016 respectively within the time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Mr.Udaya Prakash M., Adv. for Petitioner The present petitioner has approached this Court seeking a mandamus direction against the respondent- Mangalore City Corporation for prohibiting his neighbour, Sri.Chandrashekar Karkera and his brothers for raising the construction illegally without obtaining proper licence and sanction from the city corporation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also brought to the notice of the Court that for similar reasons, he had filed O.S.No.250/2002 in the competent Civil Court, which was decreed in his faovur on 30.06.2008, against which the first appeal was preferred by the defendant neighbour Mr.Chandrashekar karkera which came...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance co.ltd., Vs. Shoukath S/O M Babu
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA M.F.A.No.2162/2011 [MV]. BETWEEN : BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 105A/107A, CEARS PLAZA, I FLOOR, 136, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE 25, NOW SITUATED AT BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., #31, GROUND FLOOR, TBR TOWER, I CROSS, NEW MISSION ROAD, ADJACENT TO JAIN COLLEGE, BANGALORE 560027. (BY SRI A.N.KRISHNA SWAMY, ADV.) AND :1. SHOUKATH S/O M.BABU NOW AGED ABOUT16YEARS, SINCE MINOR REP. BY HIS NATURAL GAURDIAN/NEXT FRIEND HIS MOTHER SMT.PARVEEN TAJ, W/O M.BABU, NOW AGED ABOUT34YEARS, R/AT VYJAKUR VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK-563125 ...APPELLANT - 2 - 2. SYED S/O SULEMAN NOW AGED ABOUT32YEARS OWNER OF AUTORIKSHAW R/AT VYJAKUR VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK-563125. RESPONDENTS THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF M.V.ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED1510.2010 PASSED IN MVC NO.19/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JU...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Anita W/O Vijay Pandhre and Ors Vs. Shri Ravindranath S/O Namdev ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA MFA No.200308/2015 (MV) Between:1. 2. 3.4. 5.6. 7. Smt. Anita W/o Vijay Pandhre Aged 32 years, Occ: Household work Kumari Vaishnavi D/o Vijay Pandhre Aged about 12 years, Occ: Student Kumari Madhvi D/o Vijay Pandhre Age:10. years, Occ: Student Kumar Vishwajeet S/o Vijay Pandhre Aged 8 years, Occ: Student Kumari Vaibhavi D/o Vijay Pandhre Aged about 6 years, Occ: Student (Appellants 2 to 5 being minors are represented by their natural mother and M/G1t appellant) Namadev S/o Narayan Pandhre Aged about 57 years, Occ: Agriculture Smt. Latika D/o Namadev Pandhre Aged about 52 years Occ: Household work All R/o Penur, Tq. Mohol Dist. Solapur, now residing at 2 Dobale Galli, Vijaypur 586 101 (By Sri S.S.Mamadapur, Advocate) ... Appellants And:1. 2. Ravindranath S/o Namdev Kamble Age:47. years, Occ: Business R/o A-10, Shriramdarshan Phase-II Opp. Sawant Viha...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »