Karnataka Court January 2016 Judgments
Sri Shivaji and Ors Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
1 W.P.Nos.19835-837/2015 C/W W.P.Nos.202970-973/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.19835-837/2015 C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.202970-973/2015 (LB-RES) WRIT PETITION Nos.19835-37/2015: BETWEEN:1. 2.3. Sri Shivaji S/o Ramarao Patil Aged about:38. years, Social Service, R/o Ujani, Taluk Aurad, Bidar District 585 421. Sri Swamidas S/o Eashappa, Aged about:39. years, Member of Grama Panchayath R/o Ujani, Taluk Aurad, Bidar District 585 421. Sri Ravindra Reddy S/o Vitha Reddy Hegde, Aged about:37. years, Social Service, R/o Ujani, Taluk Aurad, Bidar District 585 421. (By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate) ... Petitioners 2 W.P.Nos.19835-837/2015 C/W W.P.Nos.202970-973/2015 AND:1. 2. 3.4. 5.6. The State of Karnataka Represented by Addl. Chief Secretary, Dept. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Vidhanasoudha, Bangalore 560 001. The Regional Commissioner Kalburgi Divi...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Ramachandrachar Vs. Smt. Devakumari
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19h DAY OF JANUARY2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.181/2012 BETWEEN: SRI RAMACHANDRACHAR S/O LATE DASAPPACHAR, AGED ABOUT66YRS R/A NO.588, GOPALSWAMY GUDI BEEDI OPPOSITE TO VIJAYALAKSHMI THEATRE CHIKKAPETH MAIN ROAD BANGALORE (By Sri: R K SRIDHARA MURTHY, ADV. FOR MURTHY ASSOCIATES, ADV.) AND: SMT. DEVAKUMARI D/O LATE SRI MUNIYAPPACHAR W/O SRI RAMACHANDRACHARCHAR, AGED ABOUT61YRS, R/A BUKKAPATNA VILLAGE SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT (By Sri: M K BHASKARAIAH, ADV. ) THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397(1) r/w 401(1) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER2DATED:23.12.11 PASSED BY THE P.O., FTC-VI, BANGALORE IN CRL.A.NO.687/11. THIS CRL.RP HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON1101.2016 AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS THIS DAY, A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Divergen...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka (Central) Vs. M/s. RNS Infra ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the settlement commission accepting the application without passing a speaking order vide Annexure-E to the writ petition and etc;) 1. The facts leading up to these petitions are as follows:- The respondent is said to be an assessee within the jurisdiction of the petitioner. A search is said to have been conducted at the business premises of the respondent and the residential premises of its Directors, by the Income Tax Department, in exercise of power under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter referred to as the IT Act', for brevity) as on 16.2.2012. It transpires that incriminating material regarding undisclosed income was found and seized. The assessing officer is said to have initiated proceedings under Section 153A of the IT Act, for the Assessment years 2006 -07 to 2011-12, by a notice dated 7.12.2012. The respondent is s...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Limited, Represented by Division Offic ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records in MVC No.1628/2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Court of Small Causes Bangalore City (SCCH-10) peruse the same and set aside/quash the impugned order dated 12.5.2006 vide Annexure-A and consequently pass an order allowing the application and dismiss the claim petition as not maintainable in law.) 1. This petition is filed challenging an Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Court of Small Causes, Bangalore City (SCCH-10), on a preliminary issue, in a claim for compensation made under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 2. The brief facts are as follows: The second respondent herein is an exporter. It had dispatched a consignment of goods from Gujarat to Bangalore on a lorry bearing no. KA 01 6075. The goods were duly insured, with the first respondent. It transpires that when the lorry was moving on National Highway...
Tag this Judgment!Aluvelamma Since Dead by Her Lrs Vs. R Nazeer Ahamed
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA MFA No.190/2010 (MV) BETWEEN: ALUVELAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER L.RS. 1.(A) SRI. B.N. RAGHUCHANDRA S/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT39YEARS. 1(B) SRI.B.N. SUBBARAMAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT35YEARS. NOTE: BOTH ARE RESIDING AT JANGALAHALLI NAREMADDEPALLI POST PATHAPALYA HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT 563 001. SINCE L.R.NO.1(a) B.N. RAMACHANDRA DIED, SUBSEQUENT TO JUDGMENT HENCE, HE IS NOT IMPLEADED IN THE APPEAL DIED ON0802.2009. LEAVING BEHIND HIM THE LRS1b) & (c) OF CLAIMANT AS HIS SOLE LEGAL HEIRS. (BY SMT.SUGUNA .R.REDDY, ADV.) ... APPELLANTS22.1. R. NAZEER AHAMED S/O R. GAFFAR SHARIFF MAJOR IN AGE R/AT. K.R.EXTENSION M.G.ROAD CHINTAMANI CHIKBALLAPUR DISTRICT. AND (BY SMT. HARINI SHIVANANDA, ADV FOR R-2; R-1 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:05. 12.2008 PASSED IN MVC NO.68/2004 ON T...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. M/S Tata Aig General Insurance Co L ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF JANUARY2016 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.984 OF2010(GM-AC) BETWEEN: The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.33A, II Floor, I Stage, P.B.No.3883, Indiranagar, Bangalore 560 038, Represented by Division Office-5, Infantry Road, Bangalore 560 001, By its Senior Divisional Manager, Smt. Neeraja Kapur. PETITIONER (By Shri C.R.Ravishankar, Advocate) AND:1. M/s. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, West Entrance, Khanija Bhavan, Race Course Road, Bangalore 560 001, Represented by its Manager. 2 (Exports), Regd. Office: No.B1, 62/5, Begur Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore 560 068, Represented by P.A.Holder, M/s. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited.2. M/s. K. Mohan and Company 3. Sri. Chandrashekar Reddy, M/s. A.K.Transport, No.827/6, Ramamurthynagar Main Road, Banaswadi Post, Bangalore 560 043. RESPONDENTS (By Shri O. Mahesh, Advocate for Respondent No.1; Responde...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Rns Infrastructure Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF JANUARY2016 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.44007 OF2014AND27452750 OF2015(T-IT) BETWEEN: The Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka (Central), C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bangalore. PETITIONER (By Shri K.V.Aravind, Advocate) AND:1. M/s. RNS Infrastructure Limited, 2. No.14, Naveen Complex, 7th Floor, M.G.Road, Bangalore 560 001, Represented by Managing Director. Income Tax Settlement Commission, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. 2 [respondent no.2 impleaded Vide court order dated 18.6.2015]. RESPONDENTS (By Shri A. Shankar, Advocate for Shri S. Sukumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1; Shri Krishna S Dixit, Additional Solicitor General, for Respondent no.2) ***** These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the settlement commission accepting the application without passing a speaking or...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka State Road Vs. Dr Lavanya R
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-14-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA MFA NO.7323 OF2014(MV) C/W MFA NO.6966 OF2014(MV) IN MFA73232014 BETWEEN KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE, BY ITS MANAGING DRIECTOR. ... APPELLANT (By SRI. D. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV.) AND1 DR. LAVANYA R., W/O. LATE CHETAN KUMAR B.S., AGED ABOUT30YEARS.2. NIHARIKA CHETAN, D/O LATE CHETAN KUMAR B.S., 3.4.5. 2 AGED ABOUT6YEARS. SRI. SIDDANANJA SHETTY D., S/O. LATE GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT65YEARS. SMT. SAROJA S. SHETTY, W/O. SRI. SIDDANANJA SHETTY G., AGED ABOUT57YEARS. AVANTIKA CHETAN, D/O. LATE CHETAN KUMAR B.S, AGED ABOUT1YEAR, THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND5ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN AS THE RESPONDENT NO.1. THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO5ARE ALL R/AT. NO.46, 3RD MAIN, 2ND STAGE, BINNY LAYOUT, (ATTIGUPPE), VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. ... RESPON...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. A.P.S. Industries, Rep. by its Partner Praveen Chabra Vs. The Sta ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the notification dated 30.04.2005 as amended by notification dated 05.08.2005 (Annexures “ Aand B') issued by Respondent No.1 excluding lead sub-oxide from its ambit as discriminatory and arbitrary and therefore, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and etc.,) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate. 2. The petitioner has challenged the notification No. FD 197 CSL 2005(6), Bangalore, dated 30.04.2005, as amended by notification No. FD 316 CSL 2005(II), Bangalore, dated 05.08.2005, which is issued by respondent No.1, as discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and Clarification No.KSA.CR.25/12-13 dated 31.05.2012 issued by the 2nd respondent, as it contravenes the provisions of Entry No.67 of the third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ...
Tag this Judgment!The Managing Director, Karnataka Milk Federation Ltd. and Others Vs. K ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the order dt. 9.11.2006 passed by the government as per Annexure c.) 1. The petitioners in all these petitions are the Co- Operative Milk Producers Societies/Unions/Federations of different Districts in the State of Karnataka. The respondents are the Employees Federation/Unions which are espousing the cause of its members who are seeking regularisation of their services in the petitioner Societies/Unions/Federations. In all these petitions, the petitioners have a common grievance with regard to the order dated 09.11.2006 made by the Government referring the dispute under Sections 10(1)(c) and (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 'I.D Act' for short) to the Labour Court for adjudication. Hence these petitions are taken up together, heard and disposed of by this common order. 2. The gist of the case between the parties is stated herein. The petitioners are the District Milk U...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »