Karnataka Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashwini Vs. C. Avinash
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 9-7-2014 passed in G and WC No. 212 of 2011. By the said order, the Court below has overruled the objection taken by the learned Counsel for the petitioner herein who is the respondent in the said proceedings, for the marking of the documents which has been referred to in the course of the order. The petitioner therefore claiming to be aggrieved by the same is before this Court. 2. The objection as has been raised before the Court below has been put forth by the learned Counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order. Insofar as the call details, FSL report and the Compact Disc (CD) which have been produced and marked in evidence, it is contended that it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, more particularly with regard to marking the electronic records. 3. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that insofar as the call details, the document as secured from the police...
Ambarisha Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(Prayer: Crl.P filed U/s. 439 Cr.P.C by the Advocate for the petitioner praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in S.C.No. 46/2015 pending on the file of the II Addl.Dist and S.J., Chikkamagaluru for the offence P/U/S 3048, 302 of IPC and Sec.3 and 4 of the D.P.Act.) L. Narayana Swamy, J. - (1) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government pleader appearing for the respondent - State. (2) Petitioner is accused No. 1 in Cr. No. 289/2014 on the file of the respondent “ Kadur Police Station, Chikkmagaluru District for the offences punishable under Ss. 302, 306 and 304 -B r/w Sec.149 of IPC and Ss. 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. He is in judicial custody since last 8 months and hence he has filed this bail application under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. (3) The case of the prosecution is that one Lokesh lodged a complaint against the petitioner and others with the respondent - Police alleging that his sister was given in marria...
Kondappa Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Dist and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the orders passed by the R3 in proceedings dt. 16.5.1994 and the order passed by the R2 in R.A.No.90/1994-95 dt. 9.1.2003 and the order passed by the R1 in case no. R.A.No.104/2002-2003 dt. 24.2.2006 vide Anx-D, E and F respectively and etc.,) 1. It is a matter of record that respondent No.4 when arraigned as respondent before the Sheristedar, in a proceeding under Section 129 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, ('Act' for short), did not respond to the notice and was absent, while in the appeal filed by the petitioner before the Assistant Commissioner, the 4th respondent, filed statement that she was a subsequent purchaser of the immovable property in question from 5th respondent/Smt. Venkatalakshmamma, whose husband had purchased the said property from one Gurappa, during the pendency of O.S.No.449/1973 instituted by said Gurappa arraigning petitioner as defendant in res...
K.R. Revanna @ K.R. Revanasiddaiah Vs. R.V. Savani
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 30.12.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, I Addl. Labour Court at Bangalore at Annexure 'F', etc.) 1. Petitioner filed an application at Annexure 'A' dated 5.6.2008 before the I Additional Labour Court, Bangalore under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking a direction to the respondents for payment of arrears of salary, gratuity, bonus and other benefits. According to him, he has worked with the respondents for a period of 27 years and that he is entitled for salary for the month of July, 2007, gratuity from the date of appointment till the date of dismissal, bonus for the year 2007-2008 and other benefits which are capable of being computed in terms of money, had the petitioner continued in service and retired in the normal course. 2. The respondents have entered appearance and filed their objections. The parties have let in e...
United India Insurance Co Ltd Raichur Branch Vs. Sri Sanna Thayanna
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA R KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE1T DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2152/2006 (WC) Between: M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, Raichur Branch Through its Regional Office at No.25, Shankaranarayana Building M.G.Road, Bengaluru 560 001 Represented by its Deputy Manager Sri M. Gopinatha Rao (By Sri Manvendra Reddy, Advocate) Appellant And:1. 2.3. Sanna Thayanna S/o Hanumantha Dasarayagaru Age: Major, Occ: Agriculture Earanna S/o Sanna Thayanna Aged about 23 years Both are R/o Rajola Manavi Taluka, Raichur District Somashekar Gowda S/o Rudragowda Age: Major, Occ: Agriculture 2 R/o Matmari Raichur Taluk & District (Owner of Lorry No.KA-36/T-5580) 4. M. Basanna Gowda S/o Chanana Veerana Gowda R/o Turukana Doni Raichur Taluk & Dist. (Owner of Trolly No.KA-36/T-689) Since deceased through his legal heirs; 4(A) Anusuyamma W/o Basana Gowda Age:55. years, Occ: Household 4(B) Chanaveer...
The Superintending Engineer ( Ele) Vs. Shaheda W/O Mainuddin Kagagi
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE1t DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.5391/2012 BETWEEN:1. The Superintending Engineer (Ele) O & M Circle, HESCOM, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum-590001.2. The Executive Engineer, HESCOM, Ghataprabha, Gokak Taluka-591306.3. The Section Officer, KPTCL (Rural), HESCOM, Gokak Taluka-591306. (By Sri M.B. Kanavi, Advocate) AND: ... APPELLANTS1 Smt. Shaheda w/o Mainuddin Kagaji, Age: Major, Occ: Household, R/o Jannat Colony, Ashraya Badavane, Gokak Taluka-591 307.2. Faruq s/o Mainuddin Kagaji, Age: Major, Occ: Household, :2. : R.o Jannat Colony, Ashraya Badavane, Gokak Taluka-591 307.3.3. Irfan s/o Mainuddin Kagaji, Age: Major, Occ: Household, R.o Jannat Colony, Ashraya Badavane, Gokak Taluka-591 307.4. Ruqayya d/o Mainuddin Kagaji, Age: Major, Occ: Household, R.o Jannat Colony, Ashraya Badavane, Gokak Taluka-591 307.5.5. Sadaf s/o Mainuddin Kagaji, Age: Major, Occ: Household, R.o J...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›