Karnataka Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Annarao Vs. Gopal Rao
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
(Prayer: This RSA is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 19.10.2002 passed in R.A.No.4/2001 on the file of the Prl. Dist. Judge, Gulbarga, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2000 passed in O.S. No.272/1994 on the file of the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.,) Gulbarga.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present appeal is filed under Section 100, C.P.C. by the sole plaintiff of an original suit in O.S.272/94, a suit filed before the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gulbarga, for the relief of specific performance against the respondent herein who was the sole defendant. The said suit came to be dismissed after contest vide judgment dated 28.11.2000 as against which an appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. was filed before the Principal District Judge, Gulbarga, in R.A.4/01. The said appeal has also been dismissed after contest. 3. While dismissing the suit for specific performance in O.S.272/94, the learned jud...
Dell India Pvt Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Tax Pa ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
1. This is an intra-Court appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P. No. 8901/2015 dated 23-03-2015 whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the initiation of proceedings under Section 147, read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act'), has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of this case are: The appellant/assessee is engaged in the manufacture and sale of computer hardware and related products. As part of the sales of its products, the appellant/assessee offers to its customers, installation and warranty services. Along with sale of such products, a standard warranty is also provided. Such warranty, which is included in the price of the product, is for six months or more. Besides such standard warranty, the consideration whereof is covered in the sale price of the product, the customer may opt for an extended warranty, which may be for one year or more, and which period would comm...
M/s. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Railways a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.10.2014 passed on LA. No.11/2013 (arising of O.A. No.III 01/2013) at Annexure-N consequently allow I.A. No.11/2013 by condoning the delay in making the claim petition under Section 16 of the Act.) 1. This is a petition challenging the decision of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench, Bengaluru, in I.A.No.11 of 2013 arising out of O.A.Ill 01 of 2013. 2. By the impugned order dated October 21, 2014, the learned Members of the Railway Claims Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the claim application. 3. Hence, this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is filed before us. 4. Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 provides for filing of an appeal from every order, not being an interlocutory order, of the claims tribunal, to the High Court having jurisdiction over the place wher...
M/S Ultra Tech Cement Ltd Vs. Union of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2015:PRESENT: R THE HONBLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.2826 OF2015(GM-RES) Between: M/s. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Formerly known as Grasim Industries Limited (Unit Rajashree Cement) Having its registered office At No.503, Adithya Trade Centre 5th Floor, Adithya Enclave Road Ameerpeth, Hyderabad 500 038 Telangana State Represented by its Special Power of Attorney holder Sri.V.K.Daga Aged about 56 years S/o Sri.Champalal Daga (By Sri.Abhinav Ramanand A, Advocate) And: . Petitioner 1. Union of India Ministry of Railways - 2 - Rail Bhawan New Delhi 110 001 Represented by its Secretary 2. South Central Railway Secunderabad 500 071 Represented by its General Manager .Respondents **** This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.10.2014 passed on I.A. No.1...
Rangappa S/O Hulagappa Lamani, Vs. Nagappa S/O Indrappa Waddar,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA RSA NO.6159/2012 (DECLN. & POSSN) BETWEEN1 RANGAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:38. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.2. GOPAL S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:36. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.3. BADIVAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:24. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.4. DEVENDRAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:21. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.5. SUJATHA D/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:19. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. :2. : PINCODE:583. 101.6. YAMANAWWA W/O TUKKAPPA LAMANI, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.7. RATNAWWA W/O MURALI RATHOD, AGE:24. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE...
Dell India Pvt Ltd Vs. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
VSJ/BMJ2d September, 2015 Writ Appeal 1145 / 2015 Between Dell India Pvt Ltd (Now Dell International Services India P Ltd) Divyashree Greens # 12/1, 12/1A Koramangala Inner Ring Road Domlur, Bangalore 71 (By Sri Percy Pardiwalla, Sr. Counsel a/w Sri T Suryanarayana, Adv.) And 1 2 (By Sri K V Aravind, Adv.) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payers Unit (LTU) JSS Towers, 100 ft. Ring Road Banashankari III Stage Bangalore 85 Commr. Of Income Tax - II Large Tax Payers Unit (LTU) JSS Towers, 100 ft. Ring Road Banashankari III Stage Bangalore 85 Appellant Respondents This is an intra-Court appeal filed by the assessee ORDER challenging the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.No.8901/2015 dated 23-03-2015 whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the initiation of 2 proceedings under Section 147, read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act), has been dismissed. 2 Briefly stated, the facts of this case are: The appellant/assessee ...
Annarao Vs. Gopal Rao
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA R.S.A. No.142/2003 BETWEEN: Annarao, S/o Basawanthrao Mali Patil, Age:56. Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kadalgi, Jewargi Taluk, Gulbarga District. Appellant (By Sri. Sreevatsa Sr. Adv. for Sri. K. Siddanna, Sri. B.V. Jalde, & Sri. V.K. Naik, Advs.) And: Gopal Rao, S/o Tirumal Rao Kulkarni, Age:52. Years, R/o H.No.10-2-153, Tai Neralu, S.B. College Road, SBH Colony, Sangameshwar Nagar, Gulbarga. Respondent (By Sri. Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Adv.,) 2 This RSA is filed under section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 19.10.2002 passed in R.A. No.4/2001 on the file of the Prl. Dist. Judge, Gulbarga, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2000 passed in O.S. No.272/1994 on the file of the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.,) Gulbarga. This appeal coming on for Final Hearing this day, the Court delivered the following:...
United India Insurance Company Limited, Bengaluru Vs. Sanna Thayanna a ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act against the judgment and order dated 17.12.2005 passed in WCA:CWC:CR:172/2002 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner of Workmen's compensation, Raichur, awarding compensation of Rs. 2,59,003/- with interest at 12% after one month from the date of accident i.e., from 29.04.2002 till deposit and directing the appellant herein to deposit the same.) 1. Appeal is by the insurer of a tractor challenging the judgment and award passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Raichur, (hereinafter referred to as Commissionerfor short) on the ground of liability. 2. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perusing the judgment and award passed by the Commissioner, the substantial questions of law which arise for consideration in this appeal are: i. Whether the finding of the Commissioner on liability in fastening same on the insurer of the tractor is sustainable in law? ii....
K.G. Keerthi Kumar and Another Vs. K.P. Ramesh @ Ganapathy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(Prayers: This Crl.P. is filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C praying that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to set aside the order Dated 04.07.2012 in Crl.P.No.71/2010 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikerei confirming the order dated 28.07.2010 on application filed by the respondent U/S 45 of Indian Evidence Act in C.C.No.540/2004 on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Somwarpet, true copies of which are produced at Annexure-A and B Respectively. This Crl.P. is filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C praying that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to set aside the order dated:04.07.2012 passed by the S.J.Kodagu, Madikeri in Crl.R.P.No.70/2010 vide Annexure-A and to restore the order dated:30.07.2010 passed by the Prl. C.J and J.M.F.C., Somwarpet, Kodagu Dist. in C.C.No.607/2004 vide Annexure-D.) Common Order 1. Heard. 2. These two criminal petitions arise out of the common order passed by the Sessions Court, Kodagu at Madikeri in Crl.R.P.Nos.70/2010 and 71/2010. 3. The fact is that the complainant Sri.K....
The Superintending Engineer (Ele) O and M Circle, Belgaum and Others V ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
(This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 19.1.2012 passed in R.A.No.333/2011 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court and Adhoc District Judge, Hukkeri sitting at Gokak, dismissing the appeal filed against the judgment dated 31.3.2011 and the decree passed in O.S.No. 14/2010 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gokak, decreeing the suit filed for damages.) 1. This is an unsuccessful defendantsregular second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 19.1.2012 passed in R.A.No. 333/2011 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court and Adhoc District Judge, Hukkeri sitting at Gokak, confirming the judgment and decree dated 31.3.2011 made in O.S.No.14/2010 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gokak, decreeing the suit with costs and declaring that the plaintiffs are entitled for compensation of Rs.5,47,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »