Karnataka Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subramanya Vs. The Chairman M/s. Amanath Motors, Motor Owners Co-Opera ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
1. The claimant and third respondent in MVC No.1551 of 2009 on the file of MACT, Bengaluru have come up in these two appeals. The appeal in MFA No.10060 of 2011 is by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The appeal in MFA No.12043 of 2011 is by the third respondent-BMTC seeking to shift the liability to pay compensation on the insurer of BMTC bus which caused the accident. 2. The brief facts leading to these two appeals are as under: On 11-11-2008 the claimant a pedestrian was hit by BMTC bus bearing Registration No.KA 05 C 2201 resulting in fracture of 1/3rd fibula of left leg, fracture of second and fifth metatarsal bones of left foot and also degloving injury to left foot resulting in crush injuries to him in the said accident. The medical record would disclose that claimant was admitted to Victoria Hospital immediately after the accident and he was treated as inpatient in the said hospital upto 30-1-2009 for a period of roughly around 80 days du...
Ghousia College of Engineering, Ramanagar Vs. Bangalore Electricity Su ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J. 1. In this intra-Court appeal, appellant is challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 5-11-2008 in W.P.No.17225 of 2007 (GM-KEB), quashing the order dated 10-7-2007 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Bengaluru in Case No. CGRF/18/2007/2131. 2. Brief facts of the case.-Appellant is an Engineering College situated in Ramanagaram District. First respondent, is a state owned Electricity Supply Company. Appellant obtained pmver supply to the college under HT Installation bearing R.R. No. HT 27 which was serviced on 30-8-2001. At the time of service, the installation was classified under the Tariff Head HT-2A(ii) and Energy Consumption was being charged and collected as per the said tariff. 3. It appears the Audit Officer attached to the office of the Accountant General pointed out during the course of audit that the appellant being a private unaided educational institution is classifiable under HT-2B(ii). In pursuance thereof, the fi...
Vasu Hanamantappa Devaraddi and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Re ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Saundatti in S.C.No.81/2001 by his judgment and sentence dated 07.12.2012 and 28.12.2012 respectively and acquit the appellants (Accused nos.1 and 5) of all the charges alleged against them. This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Saundatti in S.C.No.81/2001 by his judgment and sentence dated 07.12.2012 and 28.12.2012 respectively and acquit the appellants (Accused nos.1 and 5) of all the charges alleged against them. This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Saundatti in S.C.No.81/2001 by his judgment and sentence dated 07.12.2012 and 28.12.2012 respectively and acqui...
The State of Karnataka Vs. Rangaswamy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 :PRESENT: R THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.226/2012 ... APPELLANT BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA POLICE SUB INSPECTOR PATTANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION SIRA TALUK (BY SRI CHETAN DESAI, HCGP) AND: RANGASWAMY S/O LATE GIRIYAPPA AGED26YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O GOLLARAHALLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT (BY SRI SIJI MALAYIL, ADV. FOR M/S. SIJI MALAYIL ASSOCIATES SRI VAGEESH HIREMATH, AMICUS CURIAE) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S3781) AND (3) CR.P.C BY THE STATE P.P. FOR THE STATE PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED:31. 10.11 PASSED BY THE PRL. SESSIONS IN S.C.NO.43/09- ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.436 OF IPC. ... RESPONDENT JUDGE, TUMKUR2THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT The jud...
Vasu Hanamantappa Devaraddi Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2015PRESENT THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.2516/2013 c/w 2517, 2518/2013 Crl.Appeal No.2516/2013 BETWEEN:1. Vasu Hanamantappa Devaraddi Age:47. years Occ: Conductor Resident of Yaragatti Taluk: Saundatti Dist: Belgaum.2. Sheshappa Hanamantappa Devaraddi Age:50. years, Occupation: Agriculture Resident of Yaragatti Taluk: Saundatti District: Belgaum. ..Appellants (By Shri K B Naik and Sri S S Yadrami and Shri V K Naik, Advocate) 2 And: The State of Karnataka Represented by Addl. State Public Prosecutor High Court Circuit Bench Dharwad. (By Shri V M Banakar, SPP) ..Respondent This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Saundatti in S.C.No.81/2001 by his judgment and sentence dated 07.12.2012 and 28.12.2012 respectively and ac...
Yallamma Vs. The State of Karnataka by its Secretary, Department of Wo ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned termination order dated 20.12.2011 passed by Second Respondent vide Annexure “ R and etc. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned Endorsement issued by the Second Respondent dated 05.06.2014 vide Annexure “ K and etc.) 1. The petitioner Yallamma d/o Karkappa Hotter, filed both the writ petitions. W.P. No. 105085/2015 is filed for the following reliefs. A) A writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned endorsement issued by the second respondent under no. UNIKO/ MMAE/ AUM. KAGRA.S. RA/2014-15 858 dated 05.06.2014 vide Annexure-K and notification issued by the third respondent under no. SHI.A.YO.KU/AUM.KA.K/AUM.S/HU.KHA/MA/2015-16 dated 22.04.2015 vide Annexure-N. B) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus direct the respondents to release the salary to the petitioner...
Kanchan Vs. Ravindranath and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayers: This Criminal Appeal is filed under section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to set aside the judgment and order of acquittal of accused/respondent no,5 and modify the order of conviction and sentence passed against accused/respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 in SC No. 9/29008 dated 11.06.2012, enhance the sentence of accused/respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 6 and convict accused /respondent no. 1 to 6 with death sentence in SC No. 9/2008 registered for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 120(B), 109, 364, 342, 376, 302,404, 201, and 203 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and award just and reasonable compensation as enshrined in Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This Criminal Appeal is filed under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to call for the records in S.C. No. 9/2008 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum, pursue the same, allow the appeal and set aside ...
Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd., rep. by its Director Vs. Bindu Nee ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 26.07.2014 made on I.A.No.3 produced at Annexure-H in O.S.No.5435/2012 on the file of the Court of the XII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-27) Bengaluru, to the extent to which it is held by the trial court that the counter claim of the defendant in the present form is not maintainable.) 1. The respondent, as the plaintiff, has filed the suit, in respect of land and building situated at No.3 (Old No.5), Cunningham Road (also called Sampangi Ramaswamy Street), Bengaluru, to pass decree against the petitioner / defendant. Written Statement and counter-claim, under Order VIII Rule 6-A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 was filed by the petitioner. The respondent filed application under Order VIII Rule 9 read with S.151 of CPC for grant of leave to file rejoinder statement to the written statement and counter-claim. The plaintiff filed I.A.3, under Order VI...
Prabhakar Vs. Sudha Nandhini
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayer: This WP filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the orders of the Addl. Sr. Civil Judge KGF in MC No.100/10 on IA no.1 U/s 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, dated 2.2.2013 Vide Annx-A to the petition and grant such other reliefs deemed fit and etc.,) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 02.02.2013 passed on IA No.1 in M.C. No.100/2010. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent. The relationship of parties is not in dispute. Due to certain marital discard the petitioner herein has instituted a petition under Section 13 (1)(i) and (ii) of Hindu Marriage Act ( in short 'the Act') seeking dissolution of the marriage in the said proceedings. The respondent herein has filed application under Section 24 of the Act seeking interim maintenance during the pendency of the petition. The Court below after taking note of the rival contentions has ordered payment of Rs.5,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.10,000/- as litigat...
Purushotham and Another Vs. State by Sindhanur Police, Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.A. filed u/s.374(2) Cr.P.C by the Adv., for the appellants praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated:3.5.14 passed by the Addl. S.J., Raichur in S.C.No.118/10 “ convicting the appellants/accused for the offence P/U/S 364-A, 302 and 201 r/w 34 of IPC. And the appellants/accused are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence committed by them P/U/S 364-A of IPC. And the appellants/accused are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence committed by them P/U/S 302 of IPC. And the appellants/accused are sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each, for the offence P/U/S 201 of IPC. in default of pay the fine, they shall sentenced to undergo S.I. for 6 months sentences 1 to 3 shall run consecutively.) A.V. Chandrashekara J. 1. Appellants herein were accused in a criminal case in S.C.118/10 which was pending on the file of Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur. Both of them have...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »