Karnataka Court August 2015 Judgments
Sri Mahalingeshwara Grameena, Abhivruddi Trust and Others Vs. The Auth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order passed by the assistant commissioner and prescribed authority of Inam Cases, Mandya Taluk, Mandya in Case No.LRFINA.30/97-98 vide Annexure-B dated 12.04.2006 and etc.,) 1. Helplessness of learned counsel for petitioners and the Government and the respondents is exhibited by the submission of both counsel saying that they have no records with them to assist the Court in decision making. 2. Having perused the memorandum of writ petition and annexures including the Order dated 08th October 2013 in W.A.No.3553/2010, restoring this petition on file, by allowing the appeal, the questions for decision making are:- "Whether the petitioners Trust and its office bearers have locus standi to maintain this petition?" and whether the Assistant Commissioner and authorized officer is invested with a jurisdiction under The Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955, ...
Tag this Judgment!K.S. Chaugule Vs. The Bijapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the CPC against the Judgment dated 25.08.2009 passed in S.C. No. 43/1994 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Bijapur, decreeing the petition for recovery of money and etc.) 1. Present petition is filed calling in question the judgment and decree passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Bijapur in S.C. No. 43/1994 dated 25.8.2009 in holding the defendant nos.1 and 2 jointly and severally liable to pay a sum of Rs.10,110/- along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of the suit till the date of realisation to the plaintiff bank. 2. I have heard arguments and carefully perused the judgment of the trial Court and also the entire records of the trial Court. For the purpose of convenience I would like to retain the ranks of the parties as per their ranking before the trial Court. 3. The plaintiff-Bijapur D.C. CO. Bank Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.10,110/- along with interest at the rate o...
Tag this Judgment!K.S. Hari Murali Krishna Vs. S.K. Manikyam Charitable Trust, Bangalore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
1. These two revision petitions arise out of the judgment and decree dated 25-6-2015 passed by the Small Causes Court at Bengaluru in S.C.Nos.2337 and 2338 of 2011. 2. Parties to these two petitions are one and the same. Facts involved and the legal questions raised are also one and the same. In fact, though the Court below has passed separate judgments, reasons assigned and the conclusion reached are similar. In the above circumstances, both these cases are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 3. Both the suits were filed by the plaintiff-M/s. Sri S.K. Manikyam Charitable Trust-respondent herein seeking a decree of ejectment against the defendant-petitioner herein in respect of Shop No.4 (ground floor) and Shop No.5 (first floor) respectively situated at 1st Main Road, N.R. Colony, Bengaluru. 4. Plaintiff contended that Sri S.K. Manikyam was the owner of the property. He bequeathed the suit property in favour of N.R. Shallamma, daughter of Cheluva Iyengar on 5-5-19...
Tag this Judgment!Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna Vs. The State of Karnataka (through Hunasagi Poli ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
(Prayer: This CRL.A. filed U/S. 374(2) of Cr.P.C. by the advocate for Appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court to set aside the order of conviction and sentence including fine order dated 4.9.2012 passed by Dist and Sessions Judge, Yadgir in sessions Case No: 06/2012, convicting the accused/appellant P/U/S 392, 506, of IPC 25(1A) and 27 (1) of Indian Arms Act.) 1. The present appeal filed under Section 374, Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed in S.C. 6/12 which was pending on the file of the court of sessions at Yadgir. He has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 506, I.P.C. and Sections 25(1A) and 27(1) of the Arms Act, 1959, and directed to undergo RI for a period of 7 years, 2 years, 7 years and 5 years respectively and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 392, I.P.C. and Sections 25(1A) and 27 (1) of the Arms Act. The said judgment of conviction is dated 4.9.2011 and the jud...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Manisha, Oil Enterprises, Kelagote, Chitradurga Vs. State Bank of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
1. No representation for the respondent. The petitioner herein is the judgment-debtor before the Executive Court, in Execution No. 214 of 2014 on the file of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chitradurga. The decree-holder/plaintiff/State Bank of India had filed a suit against the petitioner for recovery of money and the suit came to be decreed. During the execution proceedings, the judgment-debtors filed application I.A. No. 4 at Annexure “ L and took up objection on preliminary decree as the same being null and void, and without jurisdiction. The Court below did not entertain the said submission on the ground that, the Executing Court cannot go beyond the decree and cannot examine the validity or otherwise of the decree except executing the same. Accordingly, it proceeded to issue process against the judgment-debtor for sale of the immovable property. 2. The amendment brought to the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, as per Secti...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suma M. Hegde and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
(Prayer: This MFA filed U/s 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dateD:09.11.2010 passed in MVC no.6447/2008 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member MACT, Bangalore, awarding a compensation of Rs.16,99,456/- with interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till deposit.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the Insurer challenging the Judgment and Award dated 9.11.2010 in M.V.C.No.6447/2008 on the file of the III Addl. Judge and MACT., Bengaluru (SCCH-18) ['Tribunal' for short], whereby the Tribunal has partly allowed the claim raised under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ('Act' for short) and held both respondents in the claim petition jointly and severally liable to satisfying the award. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Manjunath S. Hegde was riding his motor cycle bearing No.KA-01-EH-1159 on the 8th Cross in J.P.Nagar, Bengaluru on 18.8.2008 at about 8.45 p.m. A car bearing No.KA-05-ME-8489 coming from the opposite side d...
Tag this Judgment!Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna S/O Basanna Poojari Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH R DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF AUGUST2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRL.APPEAL NO.3692/2012 BETWEEN: BHIMARAYA @ BHIMANNA S/O BASANNA POOJARI @ CHATTENAVAR AGE:35. YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O HALEPETH, SHAHAPUR. APPELLANT (BY SRI. ISWARAJ S. CHOWDAPUR, ADV.,) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (THROUGH HUNASAGI POLICE STATION) REPRENENTED BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.S. PATIL, HCGP) THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.374(2) OF CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE INCLUDING FINE ORDER DATED49.2012 PASSED BY DIST & SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR IN SESSIONS2CASE NO:06. 2012, CONVICTING THE ACCUSED/ APPELLANT P/U/S392506, OF IPC25IA) AND27(I) OF INDIAN ARMS ACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The present appeal filed under Section 374, Cr.P.C. is directed against th...
Tag this Judgment!sri.k.s.chaugule Vs. The Bijapura District Central
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN: C.R.P. No.226/2009 (RES) - PETITIONER SRI K.S. CHAUGULE, AGED ABOUT65YEARS, JOINT REGISTRAR, SANTOSH BUILDING, BHAGYA NAGAR, TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 029. (BY SMT. HEMALEKHA K.S. ADVOCATE FOR SRI G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., STATION ROAD, BIJAPUR-586 101, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.2. SRI B.K. JOSHI, NOW DEAD BY LRS. 2A. 2B. PRABHAVATI W/O BAPURAO JOSHI, MAJOR, OCC.: HOUSEHOLD WORK, RESIDENT OF SHAHU NAGAR, BIJAPUR-586 101. RAJENDRA S/O BAPURAO JOSHI, MAJOR, OCC.: BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF SHAHU NAGAR, BIJAPUR-586 101.-. (NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS ARE SERVED) RESPONDENTS2THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION115OF THE CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED2508.2009 PASSED IN S.C. No.43/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), BIJAPUR, DECREEING THE PETITION FOR RECOVERY OF MON...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Lakshmi Vs. Smt Neelamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF AUGUST2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL C.R.P.No.138/2014 BETWEEN:1. Smt.Lakshmi, Aged about 68 years, W/o late Ramanjanappa.2.3. Sri Chandrashekar, Aged about 50 years, S/o late Ramanjanappa. Sri Jayaprakash, Aged about 44 years, S/o late Ramanjanappa 1 to 3 are R/at No.156, 6th Cross, 1st Main, Doddanekkundi, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore 560 037. ... Petitioners (By Sri K.S.Uday, Advocate for Sri C.M.Nagabushana, Advocate) AND:1. Smt.Neelamma, D/o late Annaiah Reddy, W/o Munireddy, Aged about 70 years, 2.3. 4.5.6. 2 R/at No.160, Pragathinagar, Chikkathogur Road, Bangalore 560 100. Smt.Yashodamma, D/o late Annaiah Reddy, W/o Ramaswamy Reddy, Aged about 68 years, R/at Doddinayakanahalli, Malur Taluk, Kolar District 563 130. Smt.Padmamma, D/o late Annaiah Reddy, W/o Muni Reddy, Aged about 54 years, R/at Chittanapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District 635 109. Smt.Vimalamma, D...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner Vs. Smt. Mujeeba Begum
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 R PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR WA Nos.8769-70/2012 & 1583-87/2013 C/W WA No.2755/2013 & WA Nos.4393/2013 & 5840-43/2013 IN WA No.8769/2012: BETWEEN:1. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE 560002.2. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 560052. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R RAMACHANDRAN, ADV., ) AND: SMT. MUJEEBA BEGUM WIFE OF SRI.GAYASUDDIN SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.10, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, WAHAB GARDEN, BANGALORE 560051. (BY SRI. R.S.RAVI, ADV.,) ... RESPONDENT2IN WA No.8770/2012 & 1583-87/2013: BETWEEN:1. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE 560002.2. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 560052. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R RAMACHANDRAN, ADV., ) AN...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »