Karnataka Court August 2015 Judgments
M/S Shah Polymers Vs. Official Liquidator M/S Canara Polypack Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 26th day of August, 2015 Present THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN & THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE B MANOHAR O S A1/ 2015 Between Appellant M/s Shah Polymers # 1, M S Ramaiah Industrial Estate Gokul, Bangalore North 560 054 Partnership Firm represented by Managing Partner Sri Deepak Shah (By Sri K A Ariga, Adv.) And 1 2 3 2-3 at # 7, Monolith Apartments Napeansea Road, Mumbai 36 Maharashtra Official Liquidator M/s Canara Polypack LTd (In Liquidation) Attached at High Court of Karnataka # 26-27, Corporation Bhavan 12th Raheja Towers, M G Road Bangalroe 1 Sri Baldev L Boolani Sri Vijay B Boolani 2 Respondents Sri Karan Vijay Boolani S/o Vijay Baldev Boolani 6A, Monolith Apartments # 7, Napeansea Road Mumbai 400 036 Maharashtra 4 (By Sri Suraj Govindaraj, Adv. For M/s Anup S Shah Law Firm for C/R3) OSA is filed under S.4 of the High Court Act r/w S.483 of the Companies Act praying to set aside the order dated 4.12.2014 by the learned S...
Tag this Judgment!Basabagouda S/O Bharamangouda Patil Vs. The Assistant Commissioner/
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-26-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.25383 OF2012(LAC) Between: Basanagouda, S/o. Bharamangoud Patil, Aged about 65 years, Resident of Koppal, Taluk & District: Koppal. (By Shri Chandrashekar P. Patil, Advocate) Appellant. And:1. The Assistant Commissioner, The Land Acquisition Officer, Koppal, Taluk & District: Koppal.2. The District Surgeon, District Hospital, Koppal, Taluk & District Koppal. Respondents. (By Shri K.S. Patil, Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to2) 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the judgment and award dated 20.09.2012 passed in LAC No.38/2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Koppal, partly allowing the Reference Petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This appeal coming on for hearing, havin...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Transvision Software and Data Solutions Pvt.Ltd. and Another Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to set aside proceedings of the pre bid meeting of the R-2 dated 14.8.2014 vide Ann-R; Set Aside Conditions 3[d], 3[e], E[f] AND 3[j] of the Tender Document Vide Ann-N issued by the R-2 and 7; Set Aside Conditions 3[d], 3[e], E[f] and 3[j] of the Tender Document Vide Ann-P Issued by the R-2 and 7 and Etc.) 1. The petitioners in these petitions claim to be aggrieved by the conditions at 3(d)(e)(f) and (j) of the tender enquiry document dated 26.07.2014 at Annexures-N and P to the petitions issued by the second respondent. The petitioners had raised their grievance with regard to the same in the pre-bid meeting held on 14.08.2014. The committee of the second respondent has not acceded to the change sought by the petitioners. Hence the petitioners are also assailing the said proceedings of the pre-bid meeting dated 14.08.2014 at Annexure-R to the petitions. In that light, the pet...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, National Insurance, Company Limited, Rep. by its D ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.120/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,66,440/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.118/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,20,308/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.119/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur District, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,77,050/with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.0...
Tag this Judgment!Marappa Vs. Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (Now known as Bruhath Bangalor ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
1. The petitioner “ Mr. Marappa, has challenged the legality of the order dated 31-3-2015 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, whereby the learned Tribunal has confirmed the notice issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (for short, the B.B.M.P.') under Section 321(3) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (for short, the Act'). 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that by order dated 1-12-1978, the Special Deputy Commissioner at Bangalore District granted a parcel of land, to the extent of 2 acres, in Survey No. (Old No. 87) New No. 145 situated at Hosakerehalli Village, Veerabhadranagar East, Bangalore South Taluk, in favour of the petitioner, and in favour of other grantees. Subsequently, the possession of the land was confirmed by issuance of Saguvali Chit. Ever since then, the petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. Thereafter, the petitioner also carried out certain construction on the said land. On 5-5-2005,...
Tag this Judgment!Ningamma Vs. The State of Karnataka, Department of Commerce and Indust ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the general award dated 30.12.2013 at Ann-A passed by the R-3 under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as per Section 29[2] of the KIAD Act and etc.,) 1. Petitioner is assailing the General Award dated 30th December 2013, Annexure-A, of the 3rd respondent- Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (for short 'KIADB') insofar as it relates to 1 acre 39 guntas in Sy.No.444 of Cheeluru village, Maralavadi Hobli, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District, on the premise that her claim for determination of compensation ought to be by way of an agreement under Sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short 'KIAD Act') since willing to the enter into an agreement after having obtained a compromise decree dated 6.12.2014 in O.S.126/2013 whereunder the property in q...
Tag this Judgment!M. Janardhana and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
1. The petitioners has challenged the notice dated 17-8-2015 issued by the Nominated Election Officer-cum-Block Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayat, Doddaballapura, whereby the Election Officer has called for holding of the election to the post of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha on 26-8-2015. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioners 1 and 2 have been elected as member of the Heggadihalli constituency, whereas, the petitioner 3 has been elected from Gulya constituency. Along with the petitioners, eleven other members were also elected as member to the said Grama Panchayat. By notification dated 18-6-2015, the Deputy Commissioner reserved the post of President of the said Grama Panchayat in favour of Scheduled Caste (Women), and reserved the post of Vice-President in favour of the General category. On 22-6-2015, the Election Officer issued a notice for holding the election for the post of President on 3-7-2015. 3. Out of the fourteen members of the Grama Panchayat, only two wom...
Tag this Judgment!Syndicate Bank, Rep. By Its Assistant General Manager Vs. Government o ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the endorsement dated 25.4.2013 issued by the Respondent No.1 Vide Annexure-K and the endorsement dated 1.7.2011 issued by the Respondent No.2 Vide Annexure-H and etc.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the endorsement dated 25.04.2013 at Annexure-K and also the endorsement dated 01.07.2011 as at Annexure-H to the petition. The petitioner is also seeking issue of mandamus to direct respondents No. 1 and 2 to consider the request of the petitioner to refund the stamp duty of Rs.15,73,760/- as also the registration fees amounting to Rs.2,09,930/- paid on the civic amenity site lease agreement dated 31.07.2007. 2. Respondents No. 1 and 2 have filed their objection statement which is essentially in line with the reasons indicated in the endorsement dated 25.04.2013 which is impugned herein. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I have perused th...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Suresha and Another
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-25-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF AUGUST2015MFA NO.9805 OF2007c.w. MFA Nos.9641, 9804 and 9806 of 2007(WC) MFA9805OF2007: BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, RAICHUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS, DEPUTY MANAGER, B.A. KRISHNA MURTHY, BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SMT. PREETI PATIL, ADVOCATE.) ..APPELLANT2AND:1. 2. SURESHA S/O PAPAIAH, MAJOR, MASKI VILLAGE, LINGASUGUR TALUK, RAICHUR DISTRICT. ASHOK JAIN JAIN, S.C., MAJOR, C/O NEW MAHARASTRA- TRANSPORT OFFICE, OPPOSITE TO GRAMEENA POLICE STATION, CHITRADURGA. (BY SRI. PRAKASH YELI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 SERVED) RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 30 (1) OF WC ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED1503.2007 PASSED IN W.C.NO.120/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER & COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, RAICHUR, AWARDING A COMEPNSATION OF RS.1,66,440/- W...
Tag this Judgment!Puttarasamma Vs. The State of Karnataka, Rep. By It Principal and Othe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-24-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to quash the general award dt. 30.12.2013 passed by the R-3 vide Order No. KIADB/LAQ- 2013-14 in respect of land in question U/s 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 vide Annx-G in so far as this petitioner is concerned and etc.,) 1. Acre 1 gunta of land in Sy.No.166/4 of Cheeluru village, Maralavadi Hobli, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District said to be owned by Y.D.Singrigowda when proposed for acquisition, amongst large tracts of land, for forming an industrial area by the respondent-Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) led to a general award dated 30.12.2013 under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, for short 'KIAD Act'. It is said that in the meanwhile Singrigowda reportedly died on 28.4.2011 represented by his widow-petitioner. It is further stated by learned counsel, that certain civil disputes arose over petitioner's right, title and interest throu...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »