Karnataka Court August 2015 Judgments
Rajshekhar Vs. North-West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, Belgau ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner was a bus conductor employed by the respondent-Corporation. The bus on which the petitioner was on duty, is said to have been intercepted by a checking squad and it was found that there were 15 passengers on the bus and the petitioner had collected fare from 8 of them but had not issued tickets to them. The petitioner was said to have been promptly issued with a charge memo and statements of the passengers is said to have been recorded. 3. Pursuant to the above, the management is said to have conducted a departmental enquiry and the charges having been found proved, the Disciplinary Authority had dismissed the petitioner from service. The added circumstance was that there was a history of 45 such instances in which the petitioner was found involved over a period of time. The petitioner had then filed a petition under Section 10(4-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, before ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital Vs. Union of India, Minist ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned decision dated 13.05.2015 passed by respondent-2 at Sl.No.87 in the minutes of the meeting (Annex-A) and the impugned order dated 15.06.2015 passed by R-1 (Annexure- A1) and etc.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed by Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned decision dated 13.5.2015 passed by the second respondent-Medical Council of India and the impugned order dated 15.6.2015 passed by the first respondent-Union of India and for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to reconsider the 4th renewal of permission for admission of 5th Batch of MBBS seats against increased intake from 100 to 150 for the years 2015-16 expeditiously. 2. The petitioner is a Medical College established by Moogambigai Charitable and Educational Trust. The Medical Council of India by its order dated 13.8.2010 granted r...
Tag this Judgment!E. Ramamurthy (Deceased) Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Commissio ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
(Prayer: These STRPs. are filed under Section 65(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the Order dated 7.8.2014 passed in STA 3462-3469/2013 on the file of the Karnataka appellate tribunal, Bengaluru, dismissing the appeals filed under Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 r/w Section 63 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.) Vineet Saran, J. 1. These revision petitions have been filed by the assessee challenging the order dated 07.08.2014 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has upheld the imposition of penalty for non-furnishing of declaration in Form-H under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short the CST Act') to substantiate its claim that certain items in question which were sold for export would be exempted from payment of tax. The assessment period in question is of May, June, July, August, October and November, 2005 as well as February and March-2006. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-E. Ramamurthy, ...
Tag this Judgment!Maxim Peter Pinto and Others Vs. Kevin Oscar D’Souza and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
1. Though this appeal is posted for orders, it is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This is claimantsappeal filed against the impugned judgment and award dated 5th January, 2013 passed in MVC No.12 of 2011 on the file of the Member, MACT-IV and III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore (hereinafter referred to as Tribunalfor short), for enhancement of compensation. 3. The Tribunal by its judgment and award has awarded a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- under different heads with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit, as against the claim of the claimants for a sum of Rs.30,00,000/-, on account of the death of the deceased late Miss Priya Reshma Pinto in the road traffic accident. 4. In brief, the facts of the case are: The 1st and 2nd appellants are parents of the deceased and 3rd and 4th appellants are brothers of the deceased and they have filed a claim petition bef...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Srinivasa Educational and Charitable Trust and Another Vs. Union o ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash letter dtd.15.6.2015 issued by R-1 AT Annex-X, whereby the R-1 has not renewed permission for 5th batch of MBBS Course in the Petitioner No.2 institution for academic year 2015-16 and to quash the communication dtd.11.5.2015 passed by R-2 at Annex-V, whereby the R-2 has recommended for disapproval of petitioners scheme for renewal of permission.) 1. The first Petitioner Sri Srinivasa Educational and Charitable Trust and Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences And Research Centre have preferred these petitions seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 15.06.2015 issued by the first respondent-Union of India refusing to renew the permission for the 5th batch of MBBS course and also seeking to quash all the communications issued by the second respondent dated 11.05.2015 recommending disapproval of the petitioners scheme for renewal of permission and for other consequent...
Tag this Judgment!Friends Recreation and Sports Club (R), Mandya Taluk, Mandya District ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
1. Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for respondents 1 to 4 and file memo of appearance in four weeks. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus or any other appropriate writ in the manner as has been sought in the petition. The issue which has been raised in the instant petition has already been considered by this Court in W.P.No.30071 of 2014, dated 15-10-2014 (between The Media N. Members Club v State of Karnataka and Others), wherein the petition was disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV Cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games(s) is/are played by the members. The CC TV footage of at least prior 15 daysperiod shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so. (ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when call...
Tag this Judgment!Nisha S. Kumar Vs. Shailesh Kumar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the order dated 31.01.2015, on I.A.No.XVI, in M.C.No.226/2012 on the file of family court at D.K., Mangalore, vide Ann-G.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 31.01.2015 passed on I.A.No.16 in M.C.No.226/2012. 2. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The petitioner herein is the wife of the respondent. The respondent has filed a petition in M.C.No.226/2012 seeking dissolution of marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent by invoking Section 13(1)(i) and (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('the Act' for short). In the said proceedings, the petitioner herein having filed the objection statement to the petition has raised a counter claim as provided under Section 23(A) of the Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Act. 3. In that light, the petitioner contends that in order to con...
Tag this Judgment!E. Ramamurthy (Deceased) Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR STRP NOs.56 & 58-64/2015 BETWEEN: E. RAMAMURTHY (DECEASED) TIN:29220. 01741 BY HIS LEGAL HEIR R.PRAVEEN CHANDRA, 41 YEARS, 421/32, 7TH B MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGARA4H BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 011. (BY SRI. T.N. KESHAVA MURTHY-ADV) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. (BY SRI. T.K. VEDAMURTHY-HCGP) PETITIONER RESPONDENT THESE STRPs. ARE FILED UNDER SECTION651) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED78.2014 PASSED IN STA34623469/2013 ON THE2THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE FILE OF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEALS FILED UNDER SECTION92) OF THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT1956R/W SECTION63OF THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003. THESE STRPs. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER These revision petitions have bee...
Tag this Judgment!Srinivas H Vs. The Site Auction Confirmation Committee
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF AUGUST2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.12804 OF2015(BDA) BETWEEN: SRINIVAS .H, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, SON OF HUCHA THIMMEGOWDA, RESIDENT OF NO.92 44, 1ST BLOCK, GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE560096. (BY SRI. VENUGOPAL M.S., ADVOCATE) AND:1. PETITIONER THE SITE AUCTION CONFIRMATION COMMITTEE, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK (WEST), BANGALORE560020, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.2. (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK (WEST), BANGALORE560020. RESPONDENTS2THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DECISION OF THE R-1 VIDE PROCEEDING DATED91.2015 IN SO FAR AS SITE NO.14 SITUATED AT NAGARABHAVI2D STAGE, 4TH BLOCK VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC; THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE ...
Tag this Judgment!Shahjaha and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, by its Secretary to t ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-26-2015
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing the resolution of no confidence motion passed by Respondent No.3 on 28.1.2015 removing Petitioner No.1 from the post of president of CMC, Basavakalyan produced at Annexure Aby holding it as illegal.) H.G. Ramesh, J. 1. The question raised in these writ petitions is whether the members of the house of the people (Lok Sabha) and the members of the State Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha), whose constituencies lie within a municipal area, have voting right at a Special General Meeting convened under Section 42(9) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 the Act') for the purpose of moving a no-confidence motion against the President and Vice President of a Municipal Council? The question is answered in the negative. 2. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the resolution dated 28.01.2015 passed by the Municipal Council ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »