Karnataka Court August 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madala Venkata Akshay and Others Vs. COMDEK UGET, rep. by its Secretar ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed praying to quash Annexure-D notification dated 2.12.2014 issued by R1 so far as general merit candidates should secure not less than 50% marks [40% marks in case of SC, ST and OBC candidates of Karnataka] and a candidate is not entitled for a rank if he or she fails to secure 50% or 40% of marks as the case may be in English. Direct the R-1 to announce the rank considering only PCB subjects excluding English subject of candidates who have appeared for COMEDK entrance examination conducted by the R-1 vide Ann-D. These Writ Petitions are filed praying to declare that clause a(e) of the notification dated 02/12/2014 at Annexure-A issued by R1 is arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal and set aside the same. Direct the R-1 to assign ranking to the petitioners on the basis of the marks secured in Physics, Chemistry and Biology (PCB) subjects in the COMEDK UGET-2015 conducted by the R-1 on 10.5.2015. This Writ Petition is filed praying to declare that cla...
R. Smitha alias Thejaswini Vs. R. Umashankar alias Prasanna
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
1. This appeal is preferred by a lady, whose petition seeking Divorce filed under Section 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed by judgment and order dated 1-8-2013 in M.C.No.3327 of 2012 on the file of I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 28-5-2003. Initially, appellant stayed in her marital home with her husband who is a businessman at Hassan. Out of the wed-lock, the couple have a son born on 31-3-2000. Subsequently, the couple shifted to Mysuru and thereafter to Bengaluru. After coming to Bengaluru, respondent was taken to vices such as consuming alcohol, gambling etc. As a consequence thereof, the respondent started harassing the petitioner compelling her to get money from her parents. Though the appellant's parents gave some money, the respondent not being satisfied with the quantum continued to harass the app...
Asha Datt and Another Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., By its Bra ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
(Prayer: These Miscellaneous First Appeals are filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 11.3.2014 in MVC No.5411/2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and XXI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore, etc.) 1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and award in MVC No.5411/2007 dated 11.3.2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and XXI Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore. 2. P. Bharath filed the claim petition MVC No.5411/2007 seeking compensation on account of the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident occurred on 25.11.2006. It was contended that on the aforesaid date at about 10.10 a.m., he was going to school on his bicycle. When he came near Nagarabhavi main road, Maruthinagar, Bangalore, a car driven by Smt. Asha Datt bearing registration No.KA-03 N-5235 in a rash and negligent manner dashed against his bicycle and caused the accident. He suffered sev...
Veerabhadra Kharvi and Another Vs. Ananda Kharvi and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 173[1] of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:21.11.2014 passed in MVC.No.678/2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, MACT, Udupi, (sitting at Kundapura), Kundapura, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under section 173[1] of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 21.11.2014 passed in MVC No.678/2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, MACT, Udupi, [sitting at Kundapura], Kundapura, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. 2. With the consent of learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as learned Counsel for the respondents, this matter was taken up for final disposal and thereafter this matter was heard on merits. The materials placed before this Court is sufficient to dispose of this ...
Smt Asha Datt Vs. The New India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF AUGUST2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3773/2014 C/W MFA NO.4311/2014 (MV) MFA NO.3773/2014 Between: Smt.Asha Datt, W/o Sri C.Dattatri, Aged about 52 years, Now r/a No.1, 552, Vaibhav Daffodils, 9th Cross, Chandra Layout, Vijayangar, Bangalore. (By Sri S.P.Shankar, Sr. Adv. for Smt.Mamata G. Kulkarni, Adv.) And: . Appellant. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.65, Eshwari Complex, Dr.Rajkumar Road, Rajajinagar, Bangalore- 10, By its Branch Manager. 1 2 Bharath P., S/o Sri Parashivamurthy, Aged about 20 years, R/o No.16, 4th Cross, Anubhavanagara, Nagarabhavi Main Road, Bangalore 72. 2 (By Sri R. Jaiprakash, Adv. for R1 Sri Lokesh Malavalli, Adv. for R2) . Respondents. MFA NO.4311/2014 Between: Bharath P., S/o Parashivamurthy, Aged about 27 years, R/a No.16, 4th Cross, Anubhavanagara, Nagarbhavi Main Road, Bangalore 72. (By Sri Lokesh Malavalli, Adv.) And:1. . Appellant...
Sri. Madala Venkata Akshay Vs. Comedk Uget
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17h DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR WRIT PETITION No.22730/2015 C/w. WRIT PETITION Nos.23049-23050/2015 AND242472015 [EDN-RES]. IN WRIT PETITION NO.22730/2015: BETWEEN SRI. MADALA VENKATA AKSHAY, S/O M.BALA VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT19YEARS, R/AT NO.16-1136, KASTURIDEVINAGAR, POGATHOTA, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH-524 001. .. PETITIONER (BY SRI S.NAGARAJA-ADV) AND1 COMEDK UGET, SECOND FLOOR, 132, 11TH MAIN, 17TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 055. 2 REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY.2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT OF HIGHER EDUCATION MULTI-STORED BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA ADV FOR R1 SRI. A.K. VASANTH-AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-D NOTIFICATION DATED212.2014 ISSUED BY R1 SO FAR AS GENERAL MERIT CANDIDATES SHOULD SECURE NOT LESS THAN50 MARKS [40% MARKS IN CASE OF SC, ST AND OBC...
K. Prahlad Achari and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-14-2015
1. In these writ petitions the petitioners have sought for a prayer for: (i) issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the impugned endorsement dated 25-8-2012 bearing No. KaVlHam/Kusa/17(9-10)/2012-13/50 issued by respondent 3 vide Annexure-A; (ii) issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners dated 8-6-2012 and give effect of promotion to the next higher cadre of the Junior Assistants/Assistants from the date they were posted to work as Junior Assistants/Assistants, i.e., 13-6-2003, and to grant all consequential benefits vide Annexure-W; and (iii) issue writ of mandamus, direction or declaration or pass such other orders, as the Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, to meet the interest of justice and equity. 2. It is contended before this Court by the petitionersCounsel that in view of the promotions given to the petitioners as prayed by them to the post of Junior Assistants from the...
The Management of North-East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, Bel ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-14-2015
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. It transpires that the respondent was a job trainee and had unauthorisedly remained absent from 10-10-1998 till 6-1-1999 without any valid reason. There is no leave application submitted and no prior permission obtained from the management. In this regard, a report was submitted by the Depot Manager, Bellary to the Divisional Controller and a charge-sheet having been issued, it was indicated that there was an earlier history of unauthorised absence, where he was imposed with a minor penalty. Inspire of receipt of notice, he had not filed any reply and a domestic inquiry followed. The respondent did not choose to cross-examine the management witness nor did he lead any evidence. On a report by the Inquiry Officer that the charges were proved, the Disciplinary Authority had passed an order after taking necessary procedural steps removing him from service. 3. The respondent having raised a dispu...
M/s. Kothari Metals Omkar House Vs. Income Tax Officer, Bangalore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2015
(Prayer: This WA is filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.14670/14 dated 11.12.2014.) Vineet Saran, J. 1. This is an appeal filed by the asses see against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2014 passed by the learned Single judge in W.P.No.14670/2014 whereby the petition challenging the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ''the Act') has been dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. 2. The brief facts of this case are that for the assessment year '2006-07 the appellant had filed its return of income, which was accepted under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') on 14.06.2007. Subsequently, on 28.03.2013, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued for re-opening of the assessment. In response to the same, the appellant requested the respondent to treat the earlier return filed as the return filed in response to the notice issued under Sect...
The Management of North-East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, Bel ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2015
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. It transpires that the respondent was a job trainee and had unauthorisedly remained absent from 10-10-1998 till 6-1-1999 without any valid reason. There is no leave application submitted and no prior permission obtained from the management. In this regard, a report was submitted by the Depot Manager, Bellary to the Divisional Controller and a charge-sheet having been issued, it was indicated that there was an earlier history of unauthorised absence, where he was imposed with a minor penalty. Inspire of receipt of notice, he had not filed any reply and a domestic inquiry followed. The respondent did not choose to cross-examine the management witness nor did he lead any evidence. On a report by the Inquiry Officer that the charges were proved, the Disciplinary Authority had passed an order after taking necessary procedural steps removing him from service. 3. The respondent having raised a dispu...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »